Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?
"Bronsing" wrote in message ...
wrote in message ... In article , "Jeff Utz" writes: How does one saying "this is not proven; it's just a theory" differ from a scientific theory? Not all scientific theories are proven. Correction. No scientific theory is proven, nor can it be. So...maths is not science? -- Robert Bronsing Read : Karl R. Popper: "The Logic of Sientific Discovery" London 1959 .... Itīs a translation from "Logik der Forschung" Wien 1934 . Itīs basical a skeptical approach to human knowledge ..."I know, that I donīt know nothing" Sokrates and ..." Much worse for the truth than lies are convictions . Manfred Hilpert - manhil. Can't you see? It all makes perfect sense, expressed in dollars and cents, pounds, shillings and pence (R. Waters) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HBO, Tom Hanks stoop to "debunking JFK conspiracy theories" | Ponds | |||
Scientific name for Watermelon Radish? | Plant Science | |||
scientific method is a hoax? | Plant Science | |||
Testing new theories of logging and forest management, known as Adaptive Management Areas??????????? | alt.forestry | |||
EM Technology critics? More scientific background? | sci.agriculture |