Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Do Theories Have to be Testable to be Scientific?
In article , "Bronsing" writes:
wrote in message ... In article , "Jeff Utz" writes: How does one saying "this is not proven; it's just a theory" differ from a scientific theory? Not all scientific theories are proven. Correction. No scientific theory is proven, nor can it be. So...maths is not science? Actually, no. Math creates its own worlds, science studies the observable one we have. Math deduces outcomes from premises defined to be true. Science observes outcomes and attempts to induce the premises. Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool, | chances are he is doing just the same" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HBO, Tom Hanks stoop to "debunking JFK conspiracy theories" | Ponds | |||
Scientific name for Watermelon Radish? | Plant Science | |||
scientific method is a hoax? | Plant Science | |||
Testing new theories of logging and forest management, known as Adaptive Management Areas??????????? | alt.forestry | |||
EM Technology critics? More scientific background? | sci.agriculture |