Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bt pesticide resistance
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:39:59 GMT, Mooshie peas
wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:34:33 +0200, Torsten Brinch posted: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:47:58 GMT, "Gordon Couger" wrote: .. When the someone lies about their affiliation with a university, We've already dealt with that. Elaine Ingham has in fact association with Oregon State University. You have not presented evidence that she has overstressed or misrepresented her association to the university in her evidence to the Royal Commission. the publication of a paper We've already dealt with that, too. The paper had in fact been published, when Elaine Ingham referred to it before the Commission, she did not lie about its publication. and claims higher statistical certainty than they have trials That's just statistical mumbojumbo. It claims -what- _??_ and discard data without documentation Again, you said data that did not agree with the findings was discarded. -What documentation do you have for that?- I don't look any further. I did check my evaluation of the statistics of the paper because it had been some time since I had worked through a statistical presentation and didn't want to make an error. Nice to know, but you know, that reads more like a diary entry. What we are interested in here is -what- did your alleged statistical evaluation consist of, -what- were your observations, and -what- did you conclude based on that. Any one of the improprieties she fostered on the Royal Commission is inexcusable in total they constitute fraud. And the scientific community and most of the press agreed. If that is so, how come there is no meat on your alleged improprieties? Does this help? Not really, Jack. The question was, if Gordon has a rock-solid case, why is there no substance in any of Gordon's allegations? ======================================= Evidence in Rebuttal - Life Sciences Network 20 February 2001, 9:24 am Press Release: New Zealand Life Sciences Network snip |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PROMISING OUTLOOK FOR FUSARIUM WILT RESISTANCE IN PEAS | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton - Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton — Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture | |||
[Fwd: Widely Used Crop Herbicide Is Losing Weed Resistance] | sci.agriculture | |||
Farmers likely to shy away from Bt cotton — Unhappy over low bollworm resistance | sci.agriculture |