| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
not quite a gardening question !
Hi all
we have a bunny and two guineas that live in the shed, lately they have had company, we know this because the feed sacks been eaten into and these are out of reach to the pets), is there any way of telling whether its a rat or a mouse (droppings ect). Would the guineas still be alive if it was a rat?? I have had trouble with a rat before which i found in my compost bin (yikes) pest control dealt with it that time. Kathryn |
not quite a gardening question !
"kathryn" wrote in message ... Hi all we have a bunny and two guineas that live in the shed, lately they have had company, we know this because the feed sacks been eaten into and these are out of reach to the pets), is there any way of telling whether its a rat or a mouse (droppings ect). Would the guineas still be alive if it was a rat?? I have had trouble with a rat before which i found in my compost bin (yikes) pest control dealt with it that time. Kathryn That reminds me of a joke--something to do with Ratshit screwdrivers. A solitary rat is unusual there are lots more around . Rat droppings are much larger than mouse poo,however, just to confuse the issue adult mouse poo is about the same size of a baby rat droppings. Keep the food in sealed containers and keep the animal surroundings free of edible stuff and discarded food. The mice and rats will still explore but won't hang around and start nesting |
Mice seem to like moving things around and making little stashes of seed etc. Cute as I find mice, and better than rats as they are, they're not really what you want invading your shed! Put your feed in plastic tubs or buckets, you're throwing tempation in their path..
Bob |
thanks for the advice, i shall do as you suggest and keep an eye out for the little visitors
|
not quite a gardening question !
"kathryn" wrote in message ... thanks for the advice, i shall do as you suggest and keep an eye out for the little visitors kathryn Having 4 cats our mice problem is only the occasional one brought into the house. Took me over a week to catch the latest one and evict it. However, if you dont have a cat you can invest in a humane trap and then you will know for sure whether you have rats or mice or indeed, both. Once caught you can release them elsewhere if you are averse to destroying them. When we had rabbits and guinea pigs we had a shelter which was used for storing hay and straw and also to put hutches in overwinter. We noticed rats had moved in but I think it was more for the shelter as food was unavailable to them unless they raided the food bowls which I doubt. After disturbing them several times they seemed to go of their own accord as I never tried to catch them. ps For a good live tap use a milk bottle baited with cornflakes or sweetpea seeds. Prop it between 45 & 90 degrees in such a manner that the mice have easy access to the opening. They enter for the food and can't climb out again so you can take the little critters elsewhere. Jim |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from "Padger" contains these words: "kathryn" wrote in message ... thanks for the advice, i shall do as you suggest and keep an eye out for the little visitors kathryn Having 4 cats our mice problem is only the occasional one brought into the house. Took me over a week to catch the latest one and evict it. However, if you dont have a cat you can invest in a humane trap and then you will know for sure whether you have rats or mice or indeed, both. Once caught you can release them elsewhere if you are averse to destroying them. Please note: 'Can'. However, you 'may' not. -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
thanks for all the advice.
pulled everything out of the shed yesterday and there were quite a few holes so i've blocked them all up, hopefully that'll keep the little vermin out. Is there anything i can paint on the outside of the shed to stop them from chewing the wood...? |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from kathryn contains these words: thanks for all the advice. pulled everything out of the shed yesterday and there were quite a few holes so i've blocked them all up, hopefully that'll keep the little vermin out. Is there anything i can paint on the outside of the shed to stop them from chewing the wood...? How about a sign saying "Strictly no chewing"? Janet |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from kathryn contains these words: thanks for all the advice. pulled everything out of the shed yesterday and there were quite a few holes so i've blocked them all up, hopefully that'll keep the little vermin out. Is there anything i can paint on the outside of the shed to stop them from chewing the wood...? Nitroglycerine? The best deterrent is not to have any food loose. The second-best one is to keep ferrets. -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
A wee sign that says 'no rodents'?
Sorry. Bob |
ha ha ha...you are all soooooooooooooooooo witty !
|
not quite a gardening question !
kathryn wrote:
thanks for all the advice. pulled everything out of the shed yesterday and there were quite a few holes so i've blocked them all up, hopefully that'll keep the little vermin out. Is there anything i can paint on the outside of the shed to stop them from chewing the wood...? Not being clever or funny I suppose something like ammonia or anything that would irritate its nostrils would be a thought but as the happy bunch on mainland Europe has disallowed the proper creosote which stinks the area out (especially on a hot summer's night) and is harmful to pets, vermin and plants, you can't use that. Rats are generally immune to the poisons put out but if you could mix in a bitter tasting liquid in with your coating that might help. Try the following; http://www.pestproducts.com/ropel.htm Richard. |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from kathryn contains these words: ha ha ha...you are all soooooooooooooooooo witty ! Too bad your posts don't include any previous context, so nobody knows what you're wittering about. Janet |
not quite a gardening question !
Janet Baraclough wrote: Too bad your posts don't include any previous context, so nobody knows what you're wittering about. The context is not *that* a difficulty in this thread. Perhaps your post tickled her saying 'No chewing', Rusty saying 'Nitroglycerin' and perhaps also undergroundbob with his sign saying 'No rodents'. |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from kathryn contains these words: ha ha ha...you are all soooooooooooooooooo witty ! But I meant what i said about ferrets... -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from Janet Baraclough contains these words: The message from kathryn contains these words: ha ha ha...you are all soooooooooooooooooo witty ! Too bad your posts don't include any previous context, so nobody knows what you're wittering about. ------------------================QUOTE================-------------------- Hi all we have a bunny and two guineas that live in the shed, lately they have had company, we know this because the feed sacks been eaten into and these are out of reach to the pets), is there any way of telling whether its a rat or a mouse (droppings ect). Would the guineas still be alive if it was a rat?? I have had trouble with a rat before which i found in my compost bin (yikes) pest control dealt with it that time. Kathryn -- kathryn ------------------================UNQUOTE================-------------------- That help? -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
not quite a gardening question !
"La Puce" wrote Janet Baraclough wrote: Too bad your posts don't include any previous context, so nobody knows what you're wittering about. The context is not *that* a difficulty in this thread. snip The thing is do we want to make our posts intelligible to the maximum number or readers or not? Without quotes you have to go hunting for context if, like many do, you read several high-traffic groups and therefore only browse through the new replies. For my part I usually have the 'hide read messages' view selected to make things manageable, otherwise I'm scrolling down through pages of already read stuff and would miss things. You can't always remember the context and won't always bother to change views to check. -- Sue |
not quite a gardening question !
Sue wrote: The thing is do we want to make our posts intelligible to the maximum number or readers or not? Err .. yes Miss. Without quotes you have to go hunting for context if, like many do, you read several high-traffic groups and therefore only browse through the new replies. For my part I usually have the 'hide read messages' view selected to make things manageable, otherwise I'm scrolling down through pages of already read stuff and would miss things. You can't always remember the context and won't always bother to change views to check. Ok. It's indeed a good way of going about responding to post. However, and please don't get mad at me, I don't understand why you hide your 'read messages' viewer when it precisely let you know what you've read or not. Why do you scroll through pages and pages of already read stuff and don't just go to the highlighted ones you haven't read? This thread is minute compared to some others. What do you use? |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from "Sue" contains these words: "La Puce" wrote Janet Baraclough wrote: Too bad your posts don't include any previous context, so nobody knows what you're wittering about. The context is not *that* a difficulty in this thread. snip The thing is do we want to make our posts intelligible to the maximum number or readers or not? Without quotes you have to go hunting for context if, like many do, you read several high-traffic groups Quite. Kathryn has received a string of replies following her first post. All those replies demonstrated reply-with-quote, politely making the context and thread intelligible, especially to later arrivals who missed the start. Despite that, every single post scattered through the thread by K, failed to follow suit. Each one was unintelligible to any late-comers. She is using the group, and the thread, as if they are her private help-line, instead of the communal discussion newsgroups are meant to be. Janet |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from Rusty Hinge 2 contains these words: The message from Janet Baraclough contains these words: The message from kathryn contains these words: ha ha ha...you are all soooooooooooooooooo witty ! Too bad your posts don't include any previous context, so nobody knows what you're wittering about. ------------------================QUOTE================-------------------- Hi all we have a bunny and two guineas that live in the shed, lately they have had company, we know this because the feed sacks been eaten into and these are out of reach to the pets), is there any way of telling whether its a rat or a mouse (droppings ect). Would the guineas still be alive if it was a rat?? I have had trouble with a rat before which i found in my compost bin (yikes) pest control dealt with it that time. Kathryn ------------------================UNQUOTE================-------------------- That help? No. Nobody has made a witty comment on "that" post. Mind you, "bunny" was a serious temptation. Janet |
not quite a gardening question !
"La Puce" wrote in message oups.com... Sue wrote: The thing is do we want to make our posts intelligible to the maximum number or readers or not? Err .. yes Miss. Without quotes you have to go hunting for context if, like many do, you read several high-traffic groups and therefore only browse through the new replies. For my part I usually have the 'hide read messages' view selected to make things manageable, otherwise I'm scrolling down through pages of already read stuff and would miss things. You can't always remember the context and won't always bother to change views to check. Ok. It's indeed a good way of going about responding to post. However, and please don't get mad at me, I don't understand why you hide your 'read messages' viewer when it precisely let you know what you've read or not. Why do you scroll through pages and pages of already read stuff and don't just go to the highlighted ones you haven't read? This thread is minute compared to some others. What do you use? She is using Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 She uses common sense and hides read messages. |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from Janet Baraclough contains these words: Quite. Kathryn has received a string of replies following her first post. All those replies demonstrated reply-with-quote, politely making the context and thread intelligible, especially to later arrivals who missed the start. Despite that, every single post scattered through the thread by K, failed to follow suit. Each one was unintelligible to any late-comers. She is using the group, and the thread, as if they are her private help-line, instead of the communal discussion newsgroups are meant to be. Not everyone has the knowledge of how Usenet works, or the experience of it to get things right at first. If the posts had come from an experienced user I could AOL the irritation. -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
not quite a gardening question !
"Rupert" wrote "La Puce" wrote Sue wrote: snip For my part I usually have the 'hide read messages' view selected to make things manageable, otherwise I'm scrolling down through pages of already read stuff and would miss things. You can't always remember the context and won't always bother to change views to check. Ok. It's indeed a good way of going about responding to post. However, and please don't get mad at me, I don't understand why you hide your 'read messages' viewer when it precisely let you know what you've read or not. Why do you scroll through pages and pages of already read stuff and don't just go to the highlighted ones you haven't read? This thread is minute compared to some others. What do you use? She is using Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 She uses common sense and hides read messages. Wot 'e said. :) I don't know about other newsreaders but with OE it seems to me much less unwieldy to have only unread posts in view, especially if subbed to several large groups. This group's a bit quieter at the moment (altho' it can be very busy at other times of year) but in others there can be literally hundreds of new posts a day to wade through. Yes new ones are highlighted but it's much simpler to have all previously read stuff hidden to be able to quickly see which threads have been added to and which, if any, to skip, who's posted and whether I've had a response to anything of my own etc. -- Sue |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from "Sue" contains these words: "Rupert" wrote "La Puce" wrote Sue wrote: snip For my part I usually have the 'hide read messages' view selected to make things manageable, otherwise I'm scrolling down through pages of already read stuff and would miss things. You can't always remember the context and won't always bother to change views to check. Ok. It's indeed a good way of going about responding to post. However, and please don't get mad at me, I don't understand why you hide your 'read messages' viewer when it precisely let you know what you've read or not. Why do you scroll through pages and pages of already read stuff and don't just go to the highlighted ones you haven't read? This thread is minute compared to some others. What do you use? She is using Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 She uses common sense and hides read messages. Wot 'e said. :) I don't know about other newsreaders but with OE it seems to me much less unwieldy to have only unread posts in view, especially if subbed to several large groups. This group's a bit quieter at the moment (altho' it can be very busy at other times of year) but in others there can be literally hundreds of new posts a day to wade through. Yes new ones are highlighted but it's much simpler to have all previously read stuff hidden to be able to quickly see which threads have been added to and which, if any, to skip, who's posted and whether I've had a response to anything of my own etc. I wish I knew what all you lot were going on about! In my newsreader I have a column on the left with all subscribed-to newsgroups. A star against an entry indicates unread message(s) there. Highlight it and in the middle column is shown the subjects in the highlighted group. If any of these is starred, there are unread messages there. The right-hand column shows the authors, and a star against any of these indicates 'unread'. Double-clicking on any item opens it. If you reply, the item window remains open, but usually underneath the reply. To look at what has gone before, either there must be quoted text in the newsitem, or the reply window must be minimised or placed beneath the newsitem, and one, or a series of them opened until the context is found. Janet uses the same system. When there is no context quoted in a reply, it makes it unworthwhile reading most of them, because it is seldom apparant what the poster is talking about, especially if, as I do, one subscribes to a lot of newsgroups, and the thread is a bit elderly. We have memory problems, some of us, you know. Is it time for my Horlicks, Nurse? -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
not quite a gardening question !
Sue wrote: Wot 'e said. :) (snip) I use it at work but not for my forums to the exception of one local Manchester group. I understand now indeed. And this is indeed why I use google instead. OE is a pain. I do have to go back to see because it's not 'threaded' as in beta, or turnpike, but one after the other and indeed if someone like Kathryn doesn't quote the previous post ... you're lost. I'm glad I asked coz I thought you were mad .... g |
not quite a gardening question !
Rusty Hinge 2 wrote: I wish I knew what all you lot were going on about! LOL!! Priceless!! In my newsreader I have a column on the left with all subscribed-to newsgroups. A star against an entry indicates unread message(s) there. Highlight it and in the middle column is shown the subjects in the highlighted group. If any of these is starred, there are unread messages there. The right-hand column shows the authors, and a star against any of these indicates 'unread'. Double-clicking on any item opens it. If you reply, the item window remains open, but usually underneath the reply. To look at what has gone before, either there must be quoted text in the newsitem, or the reply window must be minimised or placed beneath the newsitem, and one, or a series of them opened until the context is found. Janet uses the same system. Yes, so do I. But Outlook Express doesn't do that. Sadly it is not really meant for chatty chappies like us but for straight simple emails I'm afarid. On OE you do get the tittle of the subject/thread and the poster's name but if no quote from previous post you cannot tell to whom or to what it is in responce of. A responce from Kathryn as it was, was like a little cry in the deepest night from somewhere far away .... (snip) We have memory problems, some of us, you know. Is it time for my Horlicks, Nurse? I'll bring it with some home made biscuits and I'll throw in a feet massage for free if you're not careful!! Got your jiffy package today. You're a lovely fellow indeed :o) |
not quite a gardening question !
"La Puce" wrote I use it at work but not for my forums to the exception of one local Manchester group. I understand now indeed. And this is indeed why I use google instead. OE is a pain. I do have to go back to see because it's not 'threaded' as in beta, or turnpike, but one after the other and indeed if someone like Kathryn doesn't quote the previous post ... you're lost. I'm glad I asked coz I thought you were mad .... g S'alright, the feeling is quite mutual. OE is fine AFAIC. I've used it without much problem since I got online - you just have to know its little foibles. It can indeed show threads properly threaded (view menucurrent viewgroup msgs by conversation), however even with entire threads laid out on show *you* try and see where a reply fits in on a busy group when it comes out of the blue without quoted context or attributions, when there've been say 30 or more other replies in between and the thread's branched and wandered off the way these things do. The post probably won't show up directly underneath the one it was replying to - it could be half way down the screen instead. People can post how they wish but in those circs it may get ignored by many. Anyway.. enough already! -- Sue |
not quite a gardening question !
"La Puce" wrote Yes, so do I. But Outlook Express doesn't do that. Sadly it is not really meant for chatty chappies like us but for straight simple emails I'm afarid. On OE you do get the tittle of the subject/thread and the poster's name but if no quote from previous post you cannot tell to whom or to what it is in responce of. I'm sorry but that's just not true. OE is a perfectly usable and functional newsreader which shows ng threads properly threaded. I've used it for years. It has the odd foible as with any progam and they can be dealt with. AFAICS most people who whinge about it either didn't set it up properly, or can't be bothered to format a post legibly in the first place whatever software they use! A responce from Kathryn as it was, was like a little cry in the deepest night from somewhere far away It could have been yes, but because the reasons already given, and not a fault of OE. -- Sue |
not quite a gardening question !
The message . com
from "La Puce" contains these words: In my newsreader I have a column on the left with all subscribed-to newsgroups. A star against an entry indicates unread message(s) there. Highlight it and in the middle column is shown the subjects in the highlighted group. If any of these is starred, there are unread messages there. The right-hand column shows the authors, and a star against any of these indicates 'unread'. Double-clicking on any item opens it. If you reply, the item window remains open, but usually underneath the reply. To look at what has gone before, either there must be quoted text in the newsitem, or the reply window must be minimised or placed beneath the newsitem, and one, or a series of them opened until the context is found. Janet uses the same system. Yes, so do I. But Outlook Express doesn't do that. Sadly it is not really meant for chatty chappies like us but for straight simple emails I'm afarid. On OE you do get the tittle of the subject/thread and the poster's name but if no quote from previous post you cannot tell to whom or to what it is in responce of. A responce from Kathryn as it was, was like a little cry in the deepest night from somewhere far away Can't you highlught what you want to quote, then hit 'reply'? (snip) We have memory problems, some of us, you know. Is it time for my Horlicks, Nurse? I'll bring it with some home made biscuits Hmmm. My favourites, home-made biccies! Matron makes lovely charcoal bikkies: you can tell when they're done because the fire brigade comes to try them out. and I'll throw in a feet massage for free if you're not careful!! Nurse uses a rolling pin, you know. Got your jiffy package today. You're a lovely fellow indeed :o) Oh good. That was quick - we only have one post, and it leaves about 5 pm. -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
not quite a gardening question !
The message . com
from "La Puce" contains these words: Rusty Hinge 2 wrote: In my newsreader (snip) Janet uses the same system. That's correct. Rusty and I use the same newsreader. Yes, so do I. No, you do not. Janet |
not quite a gardening question !
Rusty Hinge 2 wrote:
The message . com from "La Puce" contains these words: [...] Yes, so do I. But Outlook Express doesn't do that. Sadly it is not really meant for chatty chappies like us but for straight simple emails I'm afarid. On OE you do get the tittle of the subject/thread and the poster's name but if no quote from previous post you cannot tell to whom or to what it is in responce of. A responce from Kathryn as it was, was like a little cry in the deepest night from somewhere far away Can't you highlught what you want to quote, then hit 'reply'? [...]. Frayed knot. You have to hit "Reply group", and then, in the window which appears, highlight and delete extranery. It's ok when you're used to it, and in any case better than Google Groups, for which you have to know a secret they don't tell you, for their own mysterious Googular reasons. (You don't hit "Reply" in GG, or you'll get a blank window and risk social pariah status. Instead, you have to hit "Show Options" and then the "Reply" in the heading which appears: that displays the message you're replying to and allows you to carry out Christian editing.) GG doesn't even store your signature for repeated use, as in -- Mike. |
not quite a gardening question !
Janet Baraclough wrote: The message . com from "La Puce" contains these words: Rusty Hinge 2 wrote: In my newsreader (snip) Janet uses the same system. That's correct. Rusty and I use the same newsreader. Yes, so do I. No, you do not. Yes I do. As I mentioned earlier, I use it at work, for a local forum but not gardening ones. I don't mix business with pleasure. Yet. From: "Sue" - Find messages by this author Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:26:34 -0000 Local: Wed, Jan 11 2006 3:26 pm Subject: not quite a gardening question ! "La Puce" wrote I use it at work but not for my forums to the exception of one local Manchester group. I understand now indeed. |
not quite a gardening question !
"La Puce" wrote Janet Baraclough wrote: The message . com from "La Puce" contains these words: Rusty Hinge 2 wrote: In my newsreader (snip) Janet uses the same system. That's correct. Rusty and I use the same newsreader. Yes, so do I. No, you do not. Yes I do. As I mentioned earlier, I use it at work, for a local forum but not gardening ones. snip Nope! You were referring to OE which *I* use. Janet and Rusty, as they have said, use a different one - their ISP's own newsreader. -- Sue |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from Janet Baraclough contains these words: The message . com from "La Puce" contains these words: Rusty Hinge 2 wrote: In my newsreader (snip) Janet uses the same system. That's correct. Rusty and I use the same newsreader. Yes, so do I. No, you do not. Oh yes she doesn't! -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from "Mike Lyle" contains these words: Can't you highlught what you want to quote, then hit 'reply'? [...]. Frayed knot. You have to hit "Reply group", and then, in the window which appears, highlight and delete extranery. It's ok when you're used to it, and in any case better than Google Groups, for which you have to know a secret they don't tell you, for their own mysterious Googular reasons. (You don't hit "Reply" in GG, or you'll get a blank window and risk social pariah status. Instead, you have to hit "Show Options" and then the "Reply" in the heading which appears: that displays the message you're replying to and allows you to carry out Christian editing.) GG doesn't even store your signature for repeated use, as in And this is progress? The ZIMACS way has been a feature for more than ten years. (Since more than ten years, Mme la Puce!) -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
not quite a gardening question !
The message .com
from "La Puce" contains these words: Janet Baraclough wrote: The message . com from "La Puce" contains these words: Rusty Hinge 2 wrote: In my newsreader (snip) Janet uses the same system. That's correct. Rusty and I use the same newsreader. Yes, so do I. No, you do not. Yes I do. As I mentioned earlier, I use it at work, for a local forum but not gardening ones. I don't mix business with pleasure. Yet. Janet's injecting a little Panto. We both use ZIMACS, the best newsreader in the World. From: "Sue" - Find messages by this author Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:26:34 -0000 Local: Wed, Jan 11 2006 3:26 pm Subject: not quite a gardening question ! "La Puce" wrote I use it at work but not for my forums to the exception of one local Manchester group. I understand now indeed. HTH -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
not quite a gardening question !
"Sue" wrote in message ... "La Puce" wrote Janet Baraclough wrote: The message . com from "La Puce" contains these words: Rusty Hinge 2 wrote: In my newsreader (snip) Janet uses the same system. That's correct. Rusty and I use the same newsreader. Yes, so do I. No, you do not. Yes I do. As I mentioned earlier, I use it at work, for a local forum but not gardening ones. snip Nope! You were referring to OE which *I* use. Janet and Rusty, as they have said, use a different one - their ISP's own newsreader. -- Sue 10/10 for perseverance. Can you now explain to La puce the differences between Linux and Windows so she can tell which one she is using (at work or home) |
not quite a gardening question !
In article , Janet Baraclough
writes That's correct. Rusty and I use the same newsreader. Yes, so do I. No, you do not. Janet Janet, oh Janet, I am in trouble with my newsreader at home. On this (personal) computer I use Turnpike, obviously I cannot use my third other computer for newsgroups as it is an NHS one and cannot download newsgroups. So not to confuse you any further, at home I go into Google to read the n.g. I cannot tell which posts I have read on Google and I cannot reply as is asks me to register - and when I do, I can't click on the link and then....and so on........... Sacha was kind enough to email me to try and help and through her at least I can read on Google otherwise I wouldn't have even known that. What is the purpose of this ramble, oh yes., does anyone have a copy of Turnpike I can use at home. I subscribe to Demon and they gave Turnpike away initially but I don't know where to get one now. On another note, I have got elephants in my attics - that's what it sounds like, though I suspect they have long tails and therefore I shall have to get the vermin man in again. -- Judith Lea |
not quite a gardening question !
The message
from "Rupert" contains these words: 10/10 for perseverance. Can you now explain to La puce the differences between Linux and Windows so she can tell which one she is using (at work or home) The first indicator is the 'Crash Co-efficient', or the frequency of the BSOD. -- Rusty Direct reply to: horrid dot squeak snailything zetnet point co period uk Separator in search of a sig |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:43 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter