GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   United Kingdom (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/)
-   -   Lily-of-the-valley (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/145386-lily-valley.html)

[email protected] 23-05-2006 11:35 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 
When is the best time to move lily-of-the-valley, please? I have some
in my very small front, but I would like some in my larger back...

Sue O'B


mrs-baggins 24-05-2006 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by
When is the best time to move lily-of-the-valley, please? I have some
in my very small front, but I would like some in my larger back...

Sue O'B

i am sure that i read somehwhere that you should move them after they have flowered

Alan Holmes 24-05-2006 08:22 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 

"mrs-baggins" wrote in message
...

Wrote:
When is the best time to move lily-of-the-valley, please? I have some
in my very small front, but I would like some in my larger back...

Sue O'B


i am sure that i read somehwhere that you should move them after they
have flowered


And remember they always travel north so do not plant them on a south facing
fence/wall.

Alan



--
mrs-baggins




[email protected] 27-05-2006 10:57 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 
Thanks, I'll try moving them soon, although to the west.

Sue O'B


Martin Pentreath 28-05-2006 05:05 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 

Alan Holmes wrote:

And remember they always travel north so do not plant them on a south facing
fence/wall.


Not sure I understand this - I'm about to plant some. Do you mean that
when they spread of their own accord that they tend to do so only
towards the north?


Mike 28-05-2006 05:15 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 

"Martin Pentreath" wrote in message
ups.com...

Alan Holmes wrote:

And remember they always travel north so do not plant them on a south

facing
fence/wall.


Not sure I understand this - I'm about to plant some. Do you mean that
when they spread of their own accord that they tend to do so only
towards the north?


??????
:-)

Dunno 'bout that, ours are spreading across the path to South West..
Mike on the Isle of Wight (Should that make any difference?????)


--
------------------------------------------------
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
International Festival of the Sea 28th June - 1st July 2007




Nick Maclaren 28-05-2006 07:51 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 

In article . com,
"Martin Pentreath" writes:
| Alan Holmes wrote:
|
| And remember they always travel north so do not plant them on a south facing
| fence/wall.
|
| Not sure I understand this - I'm about to plant some. Do you mean that
| when they spread of their own accord that they tend to do so only
| towards the north?

They don't like hot, dry or sunny conditions during their growing season
(spring and early summer). They prefer half shade to full, light shade.
Much like bluebells.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.



Janet Galpin 29-05-2006 02:37 AM

Lily-of-the-valley
 
The message
from (Nick Maclaren) contains these words:


In article . com,
"Martin Pentreath" writes:
| Alan Holmes wrote:
|
| And remember they always travel north so do not plant them on a
south facing
| fence/wall.
|
| Not sure I understand this - I'm about to plant some. Do you mean that
| when they spread of their own accord that they tend to do so only
| towards the north?


They don't like hot, dry or sunny conditions during their growing season
(spring and early summer). They prefer half shade to full, light shade.
Much like bluebells.



I have some Lily-of-the Valley growing in quite dense shade. They are
spreading happily but not flowering. Is this is likely to be lack of
light?

Janet G

Janet Galpin 29-05-2006 01:56 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 
The message
from K contains these words:

Janet Galpin writes
The message
from (Nick Maclaren) contains these words:


They don't like hot, dry or sunny conditions during their growing season
(spring and early summer). They prefer half shade to full, light shade.
Much like bluebells.



I have some Lily-of-the Valley growing in quite dense shade. They are
spreading happily but not flowering. Is this is likely to be lack of
light?

I wouldn't have thought so. I have some in a north facing garden under a
magnolia stellata with branches to the ground, and more under a dwarf
willow - both sets flowering well
--
Kay


Interesting. They pop up amidst a ground cover of ivy so I suppose
dryness and competition from the ivy are the other two possibilities.

I should perhaps have said very dense shade, though, rather than quite
dense shade. They are north of a wall and right under a very large
juniper which grows horizontally about a metre and a half above the
ground.

Janet G

Nick Maclaren 29-05-2006 03:49 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 

In article ,
Janet Galpin writes:
|
| They don't like hot, dry or sunny conditions during their growing season
| (spring and early summer). They prefer half shade to full, light shade.
| Much like bluebells.
|
| I have some Lily-of-the Valley growing in quite dense shade. They are
| spreading happily but not flowering. Is this is likely to be lack of
| light?

Could be.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

Nick Maclaren 29-05-2006 03:58 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 

In article ,
K writes:
|
| I have some Lily-of-the Valley growing in quite dense shade. They are
| spreading happily but not flowering. Is this is likely to be lack of
| light?
|
| I wouldn't have thought so. I have some in a north facing garden under a
| magnolia stellata with branches to the ground, and more under a dwarf
| willow - both sets flowering well

Both are deciduous, so there will be light and water in spring. Even
bluebells don't do well under evergreens, even when there is plenty of
water.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

K 29-05-2006 04:20 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 
Nick Maclaren writes

In article ,
K writes:
|
| I have some Lily-of-the Valley growing in quite dense shade. They are
| spreading happily but not flowering. Is this is likely to be lack of
| light?
|
| I wouldn't have thought so. I have some in a north facing garden under a
| magnolia stellata with branches to the ground, and more under a dwarf
| willow - both sets flowering well

Both are deciduous, so there will be light and water in spring. Even
bluebells don't do well under evergreens, even when there is plenty of
water.

Both had good leaf cover before the lily of the valley appeared, so I'm
not sure how valid the argument about light is. Water is likely to be
the key factor.
--
Kay

Nick Maclaren 29-05-2006 05:05 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 

In article ,
K writes:
|
| Both are deciduous, so there will be light and water in spring. Even
| bluebells don't do well under evergreens, even when there is plenty of
| water.
|
| Both had good leaf cover before the lily of the valley appeared, so I'm
| not sure how valid the argument about light is. Water is likely to be
| the key factor.

Could well be, but they still wouldn't make dense shade - there is a
world of difference between the shade under such things and under, say,
solid holly or conifers. They (like bluebells etc.) certainly thrive
on a fraction the amount of light that most grasses need, but I have
never seen any photosynthetic plant do well in the UK in dense shade
(unicellular algae excluded), water or no water.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

K 29-05-2006 05:24 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 
Nick Maclaren writes

In article ,
K writes:
|
| Both are deciduous, so there will be light and water in spring. Even
| bluebells don't do well under evergreens, even when there is plenty of
| water.
|
| Both had good leaf cover before the lily of the valley appeared, so I'm
| not sure how valid the argument about light is. Water is likely to be
| the key factor.

Could well be, but they still wouldn't make dense shade - there is a
world of difference between the shade under such things and under, say,
solid holly or conifers.


I'd agree with you about the magnolia, but the willow is a relatively
dwarf one with incredibly dense foliage in many layers - it's certainly
denser shade than the nearby holly. I'd have thought it was comparable
to a juniper with a metre and a half clearance - that's if I've read
Janet's post correctly.


--
Kay

Rupert \(W.Yorkshire\) 29-05-2006 11:50 PM

Lily-of-the-valley
 

"Nick Maclaren" wrote in message
...

In article ,
K writes:
|
| Both are deciduous, so there will be light and water in spring. Even
| bluebells don't do well under evergreens, even when there is plenty of
| water.
|
| Both had good leaf cover before the lily of the valley appeared, so I'm
| not sure how valid the argument about light is. Water is likely to be
| the key factor.

Could well be, but they still wouldn't make dense shade - there is a
world of difference between the shade under such things and under, say,
solid holly or conifers. They (like bluebells etc.) certainly thrive
on a fraction the amount of light that most grasses need, but I have
never seen any photosynthetic plant do well in the UK in dense shade
(unicellular algae excluded), water or no water.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.


Just to complicate things my Lily -of -the -valley do fine (too fine) in
full sun
They are a perennial weed which run several metres each year. I admit that
they are partly shaded by up and coming perennials.
Of much more importance to me is your comment about no plants doing well in
dense shade. Can you clarify your comment as I think I have several plants
which prefer dense shade ?




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter