Telephone conferencing
 

Can we use Skype?

I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan

Telephone conferencing
 

"Just Another Bunty Fan" wrote in message
ups.com...
Can we use Skype?

I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan


No.................this has to be recorded for court records.

However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with causing
maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I would think
he is going to strongly object to the telephone conferencing, preferring to
be in court alone, so he has every opportunity to tell more
lies......................

Telephone conferencing
 

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"Just Another Bunty Fan" wrote in message
ups.com...
Can we use Skype?

I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan


No.................this has to be recorded for court records.

However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with causing
maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I would think
he is going to strongly object to the telephone conferencing, preferring
to be in court alone, so he has every opportunity to tell more
lies......................
Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is strange.

TNR

Telephone conferencing
 

"TNR" wrote in message
...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"Just Another Bunty Fan" wrote in message
ups.com...
Can we use Skype?

I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan


No.................this has to be recorded for court records.

However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with causing
maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I would
think he is going to strongly object to the telephone conferencing,
preferring to be in court alone, so he has every opportunity to tell more
lies......................
Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is strange.

TNR


baldrick has lied both in person at an earlier court hearing, and within
written submissions to the court..................

Telephone conferencing
 

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"TNR" wrote in message
...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"Just Another Bunty Fan" wrote in message
ups.com...
Can we use Skype?

I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan


No.................this has to be recorded for court records.

However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with causing
maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I would
think he is going to strongly object to the telephone conferencing,
preferring to be in court alone, so he has every opportunity to tell
more lies......................
Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is
strange.

TNR


baldrick has lied both in person at an earlier court hearing, and within
written submissions to the court..................

Then argue that and produce proof at the CMC, seems straight forward enough.
Why wouldn't you?

TNR

Telephone conferencing
 

"TNR" wrote in message
...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"TNR" wrote in message
...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"Just Another Bunty Fan" wrote in message
ups.com...
Can we use Skype?

I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan


No.................this has to be recorded for court records.

However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with
causing maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I
would think he is going to strongly object to the telephone
conferencing, preferring to be in court alone, so he has every
opportunity to tell more lies......................
Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is
strange.

TNR


baldrick has lied both in person at an earlier court hearing, and within
written submissions to the court..................

Then argue that and produce proof at the CMC, seems straight forward
enough. Why wouldn't you?

TNR


Due to the simple fact that it has already been decided this claim is going
to trial, and its pointless to waste my breath................

Telephone conferencing
 

http://www.onebrickcourt.com/cases.asp?id=58

Bunt V. Tilley, Hancox, Stevens, AOL, Tiscali and BT [2006] EWHC 407 (QB)
Case Date: 10/03/2006

Held

(5) The litigation constituted an abuse of process in accordance
with the principles set out in Jameel v. Dow Jones as there was "no
realistic prospect of a trial yielding any tangible or legitimate advantage
such as to outweigh the disadvantages for the parties in terms of expense,
and the wider public in terms of court resources." [Para. 78].

Telephone conferencing
 

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:00:43 +0100, "Martin" wrote:

http://www.onebrickcourt.com/cases.asp?id=58

Bunt V. Tilley, Hancox, Stevens, AOL, Tiscali and BT [2006] EWHC 407 (QB)
Case Date: 10/03/2006

Held

(5) The litigation constituted an abuse of process in accordance
with the principles set out in Jameel v. Dow Jones as there was "no
realistic prospect of a trial yielding any tangible or legitimate
advantage
such as to outweigh the disadvantages for the parties in terms of
expense,
and the wider public in terms of court resources." [Para. 78].

If he had a decent lawyer I think the outcome would have been in his
favour.

The ISPs had a Section 1 defence all along. They were never at risk of
losing.
FFS read the above before bullshitting.

Telephone conferencing
 

On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:20:41 +0100, "Guy Fawkes"
wrote:


"TNR" wrote in message
.. .

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"TNR" wrote in message
...

"Guy Fawkes" wrote in message
...

"Just Another Bunty Fan" wrote in message
ups.com...
Can we use Skype?

I log in as Justanotherresidentsfan


No.................this has to be recorded for court records.

However the reason its being dealt with at Exeter has to do with
causing maximimum possible hassle for everyone but baldrick bunt, so I
would think he is going to strongly object to the telephone
conferencing, preferring to be in court alone, so he has every
opportunity to tell more lies......................
Only one not telling the truth seems to be you Chris, now that is
strange.

TNR


baldrick has lied both in person at an earlier court hearing, and within
written submissions to the court..................

Then argue that and produce proof at the CMC, seems straight forward
enough. Why wouldn't you?

TNR


Due to the simple fact that it has already been decided this claim is going
to trial, and its pointless to waste my breath................


I think you are right - I was discussing it with a bloke in the pub
the other night and he said there had been a full and frank discussion
at The Lodge last week, it is definitely going to trial, and even the
result is already known; I must admit I don't know this pub myself.

Telephone conferencing
 

I think you are right - I was discussing it with a bloke in the pub
the other night and he said there had been a full and frank discussion
at The Lodge last week, it is definitely going to trial, and even the
result is already known; I must admit I don't know this pub myself.


The pub was "The Square and Compass"

Mike

--
------------------------------------------------
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
International Festival of the Sea 28th June - 1st July 2007

Telephone conferencing
 

"Mike" wrote in message
...

I think you are right - I was discussing it with a bloke in the pub
the other night and he said there had been a full and frank discussion
at The Lodge last week, it is definitely going to trial, and even the
result is already known; I must admit I don't know this pub myself.


The pub was "The Square and Compass"

Mike

--
------------------------------------------------
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
International Festival of the Sea 28th June - 1st July 2007



Sure it wasnt the nipple and sword?