GardenBanter.co.uk - Interest in Gardening

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)

- United Kingdom (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/)

- - Interest in Gardening (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/154773-interest-gardening.html)

Interest in Gardening

""There has been a noticeable active interest in gardening in the United
Kingdom over the last 10 - 15 years""

Given the above statement, is this due to a) The flood of Gardening
programmes on Television or b) The increase of Garden Centres such as B & Q
where shopping for the garden has been made easier for the first time and
more inexperienced gardener?

Discuss

Mike

--
.................................................. .........
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
www.nsrafa.com

Interest in Gardening

"'Mike'" wrote in message
...
""There has been a noticeable active interest in gardening in the United
Kingdom over the last 10 - 15 years""

Given the above statement, is this due to a) The flood of Gardening
programmes on Television or b) The increase of Garden Centres such as B &
Q where shopping for the garden has been made easier for the first time
and more inexperienced gardener?

Discuss

Mike

--
.................................................. ........
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
www.nsrafa.com

Discuss Discuss makes you cringe doesn't it

Interest in Gardening

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:47:40 -0000, "Dave" wrote:

"'Mike'" wrote in message
...
""There has been a noticeable active interest in gardening in the United
Kingdom over the last 10 - 15 years""

Given the above statement, is this due to a) The flood of Gardening
programmes on Television or b) The increase of Garden Centres such as B &
Q where shopping for the garden has been made easier for the first time
and more inexperienced gardener?

Discuss

Mike

--
.................................................. ........
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
www.nsrafa.com

Discuss Discuss makes you cringe doesn't it

If that makes you cringe, you should see his photographs!

Interest in Gardening

On 2 Mar, 07:38, "'Mike'" wrote:
""There has been a noticeable active interest in gardening in the United
Kingdom over the last 10 - 15 years""
Given the above statement, is this due to a) The flood of Gardening
programmes on Television or b) The increase of Garden Centres such as B & Q
where shopping for the garden has been made easier for the first time and
more inexperienced gardener?

c) A return to our roots (cultural needs), the want to grow our grubs,
environmental issues, health issues, this land is our land etc....

Just returned from London, Chelsea school of design for a one day
workshop on garden design (offered to me by KLC plus 30 quids to spend
on books on Amazon). It's part of my diploma but the workshop was also
open to everybody. We were around 20, from retired teachers, a laywer
(still young 15 years into her profession), lots doing the same course
as me, 2 ladies which had been given the course as a present, most
wanting a change of careers and a handful wanting to do their own
garden. It seems to me that there is also a wish to pass on their
experiences in gardening - all were gardeners, design is secondary.
And that can only be a good thing.

What also struck me is that there was in another class lots of
foreigners, particularly some young French students who cannot find
such courses in France. England seems to be leading a move towards
garden design and more to the point the quality in teaching is
excellent. I thoroughly enjoyed myself and met some fantastic people -
some with whom I'll keep in touch and certainly will work with.

PS. There was however a Portugese woman who had never heard about
compost ...

Interest in Gardening

"'Mike'" wrote in message
...
""There has been a noticeable active interest in gardening in the United
Kingdom over the last 10 - 15 years""

There's been an active interest in gardening in the UK for a LOT longer than
15 years!!!!!!

Neil.

Interest in Gardening

On 2 Mar, 23:37, "Neil Tonks" wrote:
There's been an active interest in gardening in the UK for a LOT longer than
15 years!!!!!!

I think what Mike means is that with the increase in population, the
needs to build more housing, the change in our cities, the huge
redevelopments of our inner cities and the awareness of our
environment, in the food we eat, its provenance and its ethics, in the
way we live and bring our kids up, means that gardening has taken a
new role in our lives, and that in every part of our society, not only
for those with acres of land/gardens, or in leafy suburbs.

Combine this with the change in our planning policies, the rise of
housing prices, education, transport, the aspiration to have a bit of
land to cultivate, to be in touch with nature has contributed to the
rise of gardening programmes on tv and access to resources for all via
gardening centres sprouting up everywhere and not only for a minority
of people, not only for one class of people. The rat race, the stuffy
office life many leads and the increasing pressures of work have
contributed to the creation of giving more choices to people - to
reconsider the way they live, the way they work, and given them the
choice to change careers and spend their time outside these pressures,
bringing with them their knowledge of business, hence the 'garden
business' that has increased in the last 15 years.

Interest in Gardening

"Neil Tonks" wrote in message
...

"'Mike'" wrote in message
...
""There has been a noticeable active interest in gardening in the United
Kingdom over the last 10 - 15 years""

There's been an active interest in gardening in the UK for a LOT longer
than 15 years!!!!!!

I would have thought that it needed at least one extra '0'!

Alan

Neil.

Interest in Gardening

On 3/3/07 21:17, in article , "Alan
Holmes" wrote:

"Neil Tonks" wrote in message
...

"'Mike'" wrote in message
...
""There has been a noticeable active interest in gardening in the United
Kingdom over the last 10 - 15 years""

There's been an active interest in gardening in the UK for a LOT longer
than 15 years!!!!!!

I would have thought that it needed at least one extra '0'!

You're all answering a well known and long term troll. Why fall for it?
Stop, read, think! Do you *really* think that gardeners on a seriously
involved gardening group fall for this garbage? Some members of urg have
be gardening for 50 years, or more. This person is not contributing to the
sum of urg's knowledge.
He sucks in new responses by this form of post and by his own admission he
knows nothing about gardening. Please do not encourage this person.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

Interest in Gardening

On 3 Mar, 23:08, Sacha wrote:
You're all answering a well known and long term troll. Why fall for it?
Stop, read, think! Do you *really* think that gardeners on a seriously
involved gardening group fall for this garbage? Some members of urg have
be gardening for 50 years, or more.

Do you know everybody here? I don't think Mike talks garbage at all.
The way he has started the thread is perhaps a bit blunt, for use of a
better word, but the issue is something to think about. It is someting
we are all talking about at the moment. In the real world that is. Do
you now dictate who we should talk to and who we should read or for
that matter shouldn't? On what authority do you control a usenet
group?

This person is not contributing to the
sum of urg's knowledge.
He sucks in new responses by this form of post and by his own admission he
knows nothing about gardening. Please do not encourage this person.

You have known Mike for years - some of us haven't. So far I have seen
a man who is in constant querel with you - the reasons are numerous
but that doesn't mean he is a troll. This means that he is holding you
on a lot of issues. Basically you have issues with this man, issues
with many other people in here and I would suggest you stop dictating
others what they should or shouldn't do. People are quite capable of
making their own judgements. By pointing the fingers at people you
don't approve, for reasons only known to you, you are disrupting
people abilities to think for themselves, doubt many, killfile on the
basis that indeed he/she must be a troll because you don't like them.

Really you ought to chill out.

Interest in Gardening

On 4 Mar, 15:21, Sacha wrote:
You cannot imagine how glad I am to see you write this. "Like calls unto
like".

You think what you want Sacha. Your bitterness for anything that you
dim to be not worth your elevated status (deluded more like) is plain
to see. I will not go into a row with you again because I don't feel
like pleasing your ego and again talk about you and yours. You are so
boring and dull, it's beyond beleif. I think I've probed you enough to
determine how you think and proceed and find what kind of woman you
really are. I'm satisfied to see that you're quite deranged actually
and reassuringly enough, I'm not the only one who think this. Clearly,
from the urg.meet thread, you have managed to show your true colours.
Indeed, like calls unto like. I'd rather stab my foot with my garden
fork than bow at your feet like your 5 mignons cluching a plug plant
from you.

Interest in Gardening

On 4 Mar, 16:52, Sacha wrote:
Well now, let's see. Since your last foaming at the mouth outburst, I have
ignored you entirely. The decision to use my daughters to have a dig at me
was yours and yours alone and it remains so. I have said and done nothing
to you to encourage that. So - you will take the consequences.

You're a vicious horrible woman. You've posted that your kids had
ancestors who had owned land. What do I care if they do or don't. If
they do I've suggested it would be nice to help the allotments in
questions. You took it the wrong way again. It shows your disturbed
and twisted mind. You're so ugly, if I was you I would have just
ignored it. But no. Now you're going to destroy me or something like
this. You're barmy.

Interest in Gardening

On 4 Mar, 17:32, Sacha wrote:
No Mrs Rudlin, née Delguel, formerly of Ecole St. Marthe, Perigueux (pic
attached to your entry). I did not post that my 'kids' had ancestors who
owned land. I said *one* ancestor gave some land for allotments.

Sick. You're sick!

Shall I get your
children's names from the Census and post them here with birthdates etc.?
Shall I find photos of them and post links to them here? I have your
marriage date to David J Rudlin so all else is the work of mere minutes.

I don't threaten you. But you are clearly threatening me to do this.
Your ISP is now aware of this. My god! What have I done for such a
reaction from you?!! You're totally mad! I will never ever reply to
you ever. You're a frightening woman!!

Interest in Gardening

On 4 Mar, 17:59, Sacha wrote:
You use my children and you'll find out what frightening is.

But you've posted details of them. You've posted a link of the last
meet with pictures of your house and the nursery of your husband.
You're for ever posting details to your house from every route
imaginable. You've just posted about the 6th birthday of your grand
daughter. You've posted about the christening of the other grand
daughter. You tell us when you go on holidays, when you come back,
what you eat, smells and feel. You tell us every details imaginable.
In fact we cannot turn on urg without knowing about Sacha Hubbard's
life. You just don't stop posting stuff and details. Your signatures
has all the details of your house, your work place, the name of your
son, your husband etc...

We don't need to google for you. You're there, plastered on this forum
for all to admire. Don't threaten my own kids and my husband and my
work place and my colleagues. They have nothing to do with this.

This is simply unfair and terribly vicious but then not surprising.

Interest in Gardening

On 4 Mar, 18:55, Sacha wrote:
Nothing I have *ever* posted here has assisted you to do that 'lady
daughter' thing over my children.

It's all over the place Sacha. Here just a few of them. You started
talking about your kids ancestors. I deducted very quickly. You are
the fool not me.

http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/showth...=109458&page=6

in article , Michael
Rhodes
at wrote on 2/5/03 1:37 pm:
(Grrarrggh) wrote in message
...
Who are the daughters of aristocrats and royals born in the years 1975, 1976,
1977, 1978? Thanks.
Tam
Some ladies enjoying courtesy titles born between 1st Jan. 1975 & 31
Dec 1978.
Note: Has Helen Villiers, daughter of the late Viscount Villiers and
sister of the Earl fo Jersey, yet to be raised to the rank of the
daughter of an earl as is the custom ? If not, then she remains the
Hon Helen Villiers.
snip
That's Helen Child Villiers. She, her sister and her half-sister are
now
all The Lady.
Sacha

Interest in Gardening

On 4/3/07 19:13, in article
, "La Puce"
wrote:

On 4 Mar, 18:55, Sacha wrote:
Nothing I have *ever* posted here has assisted you to do that 'lady
daughter' thing over my children.

It's all over the place Sacha. Here just a few of them. You started
talking about your kids ancestors. I deducted very quickly. You are
the fool not me.

http://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/showth...=109458&page=6

in article , Michael
Rhodes
at wrote on 2/5/03 1:37 pm:
(Grrarrggh) wrote in message
...
Who are the daughters of aristocrats and royals born in the years 1975,
1976,
1977, 1978? Thanks.
Tam
Some ladies enjoying courtesy titles born between 1st Jan. 1975 & 31
Dec 1978.
Note: Has Helen Villiers, daughter of the late Viscount Villiers and
sister of the Earl fo Jersey, yet to be raised to the rank of the
daughter of an earl as is the custom ? If not, then she remains the
Hon Helen Villiers.
snip
That's Helen Child Villiers. She, her sister and her half-sister are
now
all The Lady.
Sacha

Please show me where that occurred in urg's archives. Fool.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
http://www.discoverdartmoor.co.uk/
(remove weeds from address)

Interest in Gardening

"Sacha" wrote in message
. uk...
On 3/3/07 21:17, in article ,
"Alan
Holmes" wrote:

"Neil Tonks" wrote in message
...

"'Mike'" wrote in message
...
""There has been a noticeable active interest in gardening in the
United
Kingdom over the last 10 - 15 years""

There's been an active interest in gardening in the UK for a LOT longer
than 15 years!!!!!!

I would have thought that it needed at least one extra '0'!

You're all answering a well known and long term troll. Why fall for it?
Stop, read, think! Do you *really* think that gardeners on a seriously
involved gardening group fall for this garbage? Some members of urg have
be gardening for 50 years, or more. This person is not contributing to
the
sum of urg's knowledge.
He sucks in new responses by this form of post and by his own admission he
knows nothing about gardening. Please do not encourage this person.

Sorry, I should have read who had posted the original article!

Alan

Interest in Gardening

wrote:

Don't threaten
........

my
work place and my colleagues. They have nothing to do with this.

But you did this to Judith, so what makes the difference here?

--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk

Interest in Gardening

On 8 Mar, 00:40, Janet Tweedy wrote:
But you did this to Judith, so what makes the difference here?

OK. Just for you Janet - just one last time. If I get further
criticisms, further orders from anybody regarding this matter, I will
simply ignore it. I'm taking this time to answer you, because you have
asked me and to give my side of the story and I will leave it at
that.

Because I had mentioned that Judith was spending a long time on her
computer at her place of work, (after being told I had rotten teeth,
my clothe where dirty, that she had seen me in Scotland, my
organisation etc.) she got upset that I had mentioned her workplace.
Fair enough. That was my intention indeed, to shut her up. But she
rang my office twice asking to speak to my husband, which is extremely
strange. Did she honestly expected I'd put her, a stranger, on the
phone to him? She then wrote to my colleague in London (she published
the letters here) thinking they were my employers, which they're not
and with this she tried to make me loose my job, which she cannot.

After my colleague rang me to ask me what was going on, I was terribly
ambarassed, he forwarded me her email too and it was terrible because
she had added the bit that Sacha had written about the French
translation of 'stupid' which I still concider as 'stupid' and nothing
else but which wasn't, according to Sacha and Judith. Many francophone
indeed agreed with me on urg. But this didn't make any difference. I
saw red and you would have as well. I admire my colleague, I value my
20 years relationship with him. I felt she had gone too far. I also
don't take orders from strangers, I do not let myself being walked
over in this way. I might appear dizzy, which I am, I make mistake,
I'm just human. I just couldn't beleive the incredible liberty with
which she rang my office, sent me emails, wrote to my colleagues etc.
It was too much and I reciprocated.

The only difference is that I really didn't think I'd be successful, I
never ever sink so low as to do something like this, but in retrospect
I don't regret any second of it because it has stopped her emails, her
letters to my colleague (they simply ignore her) and stopped her phone
calls. We've heard over and over again here not to do to others what
you don't want to be done to you. And that is what happened.

I would be furious if I was her. I really would. I didn't mean it to
come to this - but what is done is done. Nobody has indeed the right
to pursue someone to their workplace, trying to reach their husband,
trying to undermind relationships with someone else's colleagues,
criticise what they look like. But if the 'stalking' aspect of this
started with me dropping to Sacha's nursery on my way back from
Cornwall, I was stalked to Scotland whilst doing a community
consultation. How else would they have seen me with my long hair, my
long coat, my multitude of scarfes. We were freezing and I was very
tired. I had spent 3 days outdoors talking to hundreds of people. So
she must have came to Scotland to see me - how else she would have
known? She even posted the fact here! And that is very scary indeed.

This combine with the fact that I know for a fact that someone has
asked others via email to killfile me as resulted in me finding myself
in a 'troll' position and that hurts me immensely. But what do you
want me to do? If someone is found to be replying to me and getting
very friendly, they get the same treatment. Look at Jenny, look at
Uncle, even Martin got it a couple of days ago. The best thing is to
just ignore anyone telling you to killfile him/her, jump on the
dispute waggon and keep to the subject at hand which is gardening.

This is usenet - and as much as I would like to give you further
informations which I'm sure would put you even more in my shoes, I
just cannot without once again giving too many personnal info out to
be used to yet again further ammunitions. I think I've spoken enough
about myself.

I hope this clarify your question. I value your posts, I value
everydoby's posts for that matter, always, though as any other human
being, I do get a pang when I get put down unecessarily on the back of
someone else's post to me. If we do not have the time to read through
all the bumph that is being posted here, then one surely should just
keep to posts that are relevant to them, and keep their noses out of
somebody else's querels.

Interest in Gardening

"La Puce" wrote in message
On 8 Mar, 00:40, Janet Tweedy wrote:
But you did this to Judith, so what makes the difference here?

OK. Just for you Janet - just one last time. If I get further
criticisms, further orders from anybody regarding this matter, I will
simply ignore it.

Now that would be a first for you!

I'm taking this time to answer you, because you have
asked me and to give my side of the story and I will leave it at
that.

No, she did not ask you to give your side of the story. She made what is
known as rhetorical statement.

Because I had mentioned that Judith was spending a long time on her
computer at her place of work,

No, you accused her of USING her work computer to make posts to urg. But
you did more than this didn't you? You complained to Judith's employers and
they then had to use scarce public funds doing an investigation of Judith's
computer use. They found out that your complaints were completely false.
You are malicious and a waster of tax money that each and every Brit pays.
They should sue the arse off you for your time wasting and maliciousness.

(after being told I had rotten teeth,
my clothe where dirty, that she had seen me in Scotland, my
organisation etc.) she got upset that I had mentioned her workplace.
Fair enough. That was my intention indeed, to shut her up.

Yes, you do like to control people.

But she
rang my office twice asking to speak to my husband,

That is what YOU claim Judith did, whereas Judith has denied it. Given that
you have repeatedly been caught out lying here from one post to the next or
claiming that you have been misunderstood or giving some other implausible
excuse for your errors and lies whilst Judith has not, you are not credible
in making such claims. I believe Judith and not you as will everyone who
has an ounce of common sense and can read.

which is extremely
strange. Did she honestly expected I'd put her, a stranger, on the
phone to him?

Even if Judith had rung (which I and most others but your idiot eggers on
don't believe) I have no doubt that you love to control who talks to your
husband and who doesn't.

She then wrote to my colleague in London (she published
the letters here)

Yes and they found out the truth about you didn't they?

thinking they were my employers, which they're not
and with this she tried to make me loose my job, which she cannot.

No but someone should. You give URBED a vile reputation.

After my colleague rang me to ask me what was going on, I was terribly
ambarassed, he forwarded me her email too and it was terrible because
she had added the bit that Sacha had written about the French
translation of 'stupid' which I still concider as 'stupid' and nothing
else but which wasn't, according to Sacha and Judith. Many francophone
indeed agreed with me on urg. But this didn't make any difference. I
saw red and you would have as well. I admire my colleague, I value my
20 years relationship with him.

I'll bet he's now realised your real worth to the organisation too.

I felt she had gone too far. I also
don't take orders from strangers,

No, that much is obvious. But then most of us know that it is mere common
human decency to avoid trying to maliciously hurt others by lying or making
false statments or exposing details of their children to those who have no
need to know. You aren't restricted by such things as mere common human
decency.

I do not let myself being walked
over in this way. I might appear dizzy, which I am, I make mistake,
I'm just human.

You make huge mistakes but I doubt that is because you are human. I don't
see you as being human in any way shape or form.

I just couldn't beleive the incredible liberty with
which she rang my office, sent me emails, wrote to my colleagues etc.
It was too much and I reciprocated.

Liberty? What barefaced garbage!

You lied about her actions and her computer usage. You made false
accusations against her to her employer. You cost taxpayers money by making
those false accusations. You tried to get her sacked.

You didn't reciprocate you sad piece of work, you initiated! What's more,
you were found out for being a malicious liar and a troublemaker.

The only difference is that I really didn't think I'd be successful, I
never ever sink so low as to do something like this,

God how do you live with yourself? Most people have some capacity for guilt
when caught out lying and being malicious but not you. You just act the
pathetic, wee, hard done by thing and hope that some sad sack like your
eggers on will actually believe your lies! Your gall knows no bounds!

but in retrospect
I don't regret any second of it

No. Malicious troublemakers such as yourself don't give a thuppenny bit for
the wasting of tax payer's money or being caught out making false
accusations. They just content themselves with lying to themsleves and
continuing to lie to others at every given opportunity.

I would be furious if I was her. I really would. I didn't mean it to
come to this - but what is done is done. Nobody has indeed the right
to pursue someone to their workplace,

Excuse me while I clean up the spew on my keyboard! You are such a
hypocrite giving this mealy mouthed justification for you own vile actions.
YOU made false accustions to Judith's employer and YOU were caught out as a
result of that lie. At least the London office of URBED now know that you
are a nasty piece of work.

You must be happy though that your husband hasn't yet twigged that you lie
like a pig in mud.

trying to reach their husband,
trying to undermind relationships with someone else's colleagues,
criticise what they look like. But if the 'stalking' aspect of this
started with me dropping to Sacha's nursery on my way back from
Cornwall, I was stalked to Scotland whilst doing a community
consultation. How else would they have seen me with my long hair, my
long coat, my multitude of scarfes. We were freezing and I was very
tired. I had spent 3 days outdoors talking to hundreds of people. So
she must have came to Scotland to see me - how else she would have
known? She even posted the fact here! And that is very scary indeed.

Oh yes, of course. Dear itty bitty, vulnerable you just happened to drop by
(unannounced) to Sacha's nursery to have your photo taken outside whereupon
your dear sweet wee sanitised Manchester teenager's suddenly got a fit of
the wobblies and didn't want to meet that "nasty woman" (such sweet mouthed
wee Manchester teenagers! Where di you hire these paragons?) whilst nasty
Judith MUST have stalked you to Scotland. What absolute crap!

The only one who has engaged in either stalking or threats or malicious
action here is you. Grow up or at least try to get a grip on reality!
Don't you realise that we can all read, that we can all remember what you
write from one post to the next, that your nasty lies, your flirtations with
the dirty old men of the group, your agist, sexist, foul mouthed comments
and justifications and attempts at nasty anonymous net stalking are
archived?

You really are both stupid and self deluded. And you leave tracks a mile
wide. When someone does finally take legal action against you, you have
left tracks a mile wide. Your poor deluded husband and URBED are going to
be in for a big surprise aren't they? You may be able to continue to lie to
yourself but once this gets to a court or some sort of mediation if such a
thing is available in the UK, your arse will be well and truly fried. And
deservedly so. You may be able to lie to yourself and sucker your husband
and the dirty old men of this group into thinking you are a sweet,
vulnerable morsel but others involved in any legal forum look at facts. The
facts are that you take action to deliberately attempt to damage others.
That can be proven in what you tried to do with Judith. That can be proven
by the trail of posting you have left all over the internet full of threats
and inconsistencies of story as and when you are yet again caught out in a
lie.

You have no crediblity but that doesn't stop you. What a shocker you are.

I feel sorry for your husband and children as they will suddenly find
themselves in a very nasty situation. It's only a matter of time given your
intemperate and self deluding behaviour.

This combine with the fact that I know for a fact that someone has
asked others via email to killfile me as resulted in me finding myself
in a 'troll' position and that hurts me immensely.

Well given the extraordinary efforts you have gone to to hurt others both
here and other news groups that is quite satisfying. I hope that before you
are finished your nasty little snivelling life, you receive far greater hurt
than you have tried to give so maliciously to others.

But what do you
want me to do? If someone is found to be replying to me and getting
very friendly, they get the same treatment. Look at Jenny, look at
Uncle, even Martin got it a couple of days ago. The best thing is to
just ignore anyone telling you to killfile him/her, jump on the
dispute waggon and keep to the subject at hand which is gardening.

More mealy mouthed twaddle. If you ever stuck to gardening and took time off
from your flirtation with Uncle and others you might actually learn
something about gardening rather than making the howlers of mistakes that
you do.

I hope this clarify your question. I value your posts, I value
everydoby's posts for that matter, always, though as any other human
being, I do get a pang when I get put down unecessarily on the back of
someone else's post to me. If we do not have the time to read through
all the bumph that is being posted here, then one surely should just
keep to posts that are relevant to them, and keep their noses out of
somebody else's querels.

Excuse me, I need to go and vomit again.

Interest in Gardening

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:54:57 +1100, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given
wrote:

"La Puce" wrote in message
On 8 Mar, 00:40, Janet Tweedy wrote:
But you did this to Judith, so what makes the difference here?

OK. Just for you Janet - just one last time. If I get further
criticisms, further orders from anybody regarding this matter, I will
simply ignore it.

Now that would be a first for you!

I'm taking this time to answer you, because you have
asked me and to give my side of the story and I will leave it at
that.

No, she did not ask you to give your side of the story. She made what is
known as rhetorical statement.

Because I had mentioned that Judith was spending a long time on her
computer at her place of work,

No, you accused her of USING her work computer to make posts to urg. But
you did more than this didn't you? You complained to Judith's employers and
they then had to use scarce public funds doing an investigation of Judith's
computer use.

IF she was using her employees computers to post here, and troll, then
that is bringing her employees into disrepute. Employers don't pay
people to troll and netkop in their time. If I caught her doing it, I
would complain too.

People who live in glass houses, should not throw stones!

snip bully boy vitriol

--

Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!

Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

Interest in Gardening

"Pete (.¿.)" wrote in message
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:54:57 +1100, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given
wrote:
"La Puce" wrote in message
On 8 Mar, 00:40, Janet Tweedy wrote:
But you did this to Judith, so what makes the difference here?

OK. Just for you Janet - just one last time. If I get further
criticisms, further orders from anybody regarding this matter, I will
simply ignore it.

Because I had mentioned that Judith was spending a long time on her
computer at her place of work,

No, you accused her of USING her work computer to make posts to urg. But
you did more than this didn't you? You complained to Judith's employers
and
they then had to use scarce public funds doing an investigation of
Judith's
computer use.

IF she was using her employees computers to post here, and troll, then
that is bringing her employees into disrepute. Employers don't pay
people to troll and netkop in their time. If I caught her doing it, I
would complain too.

Thank you so much for so promptly confirming my suspicion that you were
either a troll, one of Puce's sock puppets or one of her gullible eggers on.

Interest in Gardening

On 8 Mar, 13:58, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote:
Thank you so much for so promptly confirming my suspicion that you were
either a troll, one of Puce's sock puppets or one of her gullible eggers on

It's nice to be liked. You should try it :o)

Interest in Gardening

On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 00:58:01 +1100, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given
wrote:

"Pete (.¿.)" wrote in message
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 23:54:57 +1100, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given
wrote:
"La Puce" wrote in message
On 8 Mar, 00:40, Janet Tweedy wrote:
But you did this to Judith, so what makes the difference here?

OK. Just for you Janet - just one last time. If I get further
criticisms, further orders from anybody regarding this matter, I will
simply ignore it.

Because I had mentioned that Judith was spending a long time on her
computer at her place of work,

No, you accused her of USING her work computer to make posts to urg. But
you did more than this didn't you? You complained to Judith's employers
and
they then had to use scarce public funds doing an investigation of
Judith's
computer use.

IF she was using her employees computers to post here, and troll, then
that is bringing her employees into disrepute. Employers don't pay
people to troll and netkop in their time. If I caught her doing it, I
would complain too.

Thank you so much for so promptly confirming my suspicion that you were
either a troll, one of Puce's sock puppets or one of her gullible eggers on.

Truth hurts does it bully boy?

--

Avoid the rush at the last judgement. Be converted now instead!

Disclaimer

Pete has taken all reasonable care to ensure that pages published by him
were accurate on the date of publication or last modification.
Other pages which may be linked or which Pete may have published are in
a personal capacity. Pete takes no responsibility for the consequences
of error or for any loss or damage suffered by users of any of the information
published on any of these pages, and such information does not form any
basis of a contract with readers or users of it.

It is in the nature of Usenet & Web sites, that much of the information is
experimental or constantly changing, that information published may
be for test purposes only, may be out of date, or may be the personal
opinion of the author.
Readers should verify information gained from the Web/Usenet with the appropriate
authorities before relying on it.

Should you no longer wish to read this material or content, please use your
newsreaders kill filter.

Interest in Gardening

"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote in message
...
"La Puce" wrote in message
On 8 Mar, 00:40, Janet Tweedy wrote:
But you did this to Judith, so what makes the difference here?

OK. Just for you Janet - just one last time. If I get further
criticisms, further orders from anybody regarding this matter, I will
simply ignore it.

Now that would be a first for you!

Stuff deleted:-

Excuse me, I need to go and vomit again.

It would be better for your health if you did not respond to the Puke, she
only makes you puke!

Put her in your killfile, like I did!

Alan

Interest in Gardening

"Anne Jackson" wrote in message
...
The message from "La Puce" contains these words:

On 8 Mar, 13:58, "FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote:
Thank you so much for so promptly confirming my suspicion that you were
either a troll, one of Puce's sock puppets or one of her gullible
eggers on

It's nice to be liked. You should try it :o)

Nice people are liked, without actually TRYING..but you
wouldn't know that, would you?

Please, please, please, Anne, I have La Puke in my killfile so I do not have
to read her rubbish, and there you are responding to one of her posts, so I
have to read it anyway!

Naughty, naughty.

Alan

Interest in Gardening

"Alan Holmes" wrote in message
"FarmI" ask@itshall be given wrote in message
"La Puce" wrote in message
On 8 Mar, 00:40, Janet Tweedy wrote:
But you did this to Judith, so what makes the difference here?

OK. Just for you Janet - just one last time. If I get further
criticisms, further orders from anybody regarding this matter, I will
simply ignore it.

Now that would be a first for you!

Stuff deleted:-

Excuse me, I need to go and vomit again.

It would be better for your health if you did not respond to the Puke, she
only makes you puke!

She makes most people puke, and especially the people she so consistently
lies about and slanders. The woman has no sense of decency.

Put her in your killfile, like I did!

All very well in theory and I did drop the lying hussy in my killfile for a
while but since her latest lot of lies about Judith and her usual self
deluded justifications for her malicious false accusations, I've come around
to Sacha's way of thinking. Someone has to try to keep the manipulative loon
truthful - sorry, I know that she will never willingly be truthful, so I'll
rephrase it. Someone has to try to call her on her repeated lies and
attempts to wiggle out of her noxious attempts to deceive and to get even
the most basic of facts wrong.