Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie
girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and about time too!
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza
wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie
girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and about time too!
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:51:31 GMT, Rudy Canoza
wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. More of a parrot :-)) Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie
girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and about time too!
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:54:25 GMT, Rudy Canoza
wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. More of a parrot :-)) Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie
girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and about time too!
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:54:30 GMT, Rudy Canoza
wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. More of a parrot :-)) As you don't have anything intelligent to offer I shan't respond any further. If you feel deprived and want to get the last word in please feel free to make a fool of yourself even further Bye Rudy Time for your nappy change. Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie
girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:54:30 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. More of a parrot No more serious response was ever warranted to your unserious, sophomoric questions, angie girl. You never were a serious participant here, and your crap never merited serious response. As you don't have anything intelligent to offer Translation: as you cannot defend your bullshit and shabby moral beliefs about animals... I shan't respond any further. AREN'T you the dainty thing, though! "Shan't" - how quaintly dainty. If he were alive, Oscar Wilde would come in your face. Nice flouncing off, angie girl. I knew you'd eventually get around to it. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie
girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie
girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Now even spiders, squid and lobsters could have rights, and abouttime too!
right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie
girl, playing her role, wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:56:40 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:24:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:40:06 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:38:19 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:08:24 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:21 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: right on cue, snarky unserious self-marginalized angie girl, playing her role, wrote: On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:25:49 GMT, Rudy Canoza wrote: You can't defend your inconsistency, angie girl. I already have. You never even tried to defend your towering inconsistency, angie girl. See my other evasive, snarky bullshit. Angus Macmillan I already did, angie girl. It was a zero. I'm getting desperate now Angus Macmillan We could see that weeks ago, angie girl. No, you couldn't see anything. Yes, we could see that you're a sophomoric, hysterical, unserious twit who can't defend his silly "ar" beliefs. Parrot. non sequitur You really don't have a clue how to defend your belief about animals. Of course I do. No, very clearly you don't, which is why you haven't even tried, angie girl, preferring instead to do your snarky and juvenile puppet show. In what way? Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. Parrot. Bad faith and lack of serious purpose noted, angie girl. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|