GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   United Kingdom (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/)
-   -   Tree ID (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/166378-tree-id.html)

Stuart Noble 02-11-2007 03:12 PM

Tree ID
 
Hope someone can identify this for me

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1


It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told
it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it.
Thanks for any info.

Sacha 02-11-2007 03:33 PM

Tree ID
 
On 2/11/07 15:12, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

Hope someone can identify this for me

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1


It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told
it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it.
Thanks for any info.


The leaves look more willow-like than acer to me. Salix integra?

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Stuart Noble 02-11-2007 04:31 PM

Tree ID
 
Sacha wrote:
On 2/11/07 15:12, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

Hope someone can identify this for me

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1

It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told
it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it.
Thanks for any info.


The leaves look more willow-like than acer to me. Salix integra?


That's it! Many thanks.
Why do I sit and wonder about these things when there's a digital camera
sitting there? Partly because I can never get that tinypic link thing to
work. No change there then :-)

Sacha 02-11-2007 05:14 PM

Tree ID
 
On 2/11/07 16:31, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

Sacha wrote:
On 2/11/07 15:12, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

Hope someone can identify this for me

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1
It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told
it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it.
Thanks for any info.


The leaves look more willow-like than acer to me. Salix integra?


That's it! Many thanks.


Glad we've found it.

Why do I sit and wonder about these things when there's a digital camera
sitting there? Partly because I can never get that tinypic link thing to
work. No change there then :-)


I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo
slowly that it's best to go off and do something else!


--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Stewart Robert Hinsley 02-11-2007 06:08 PM

Tree ID
 
In message , Sacha
writes
On 2/11/07 16:31, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

Sacha wrote:
On 2/11/07 15:12, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

Hope someone can identify this for me

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1
It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told
it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it.
Thanks for any info.

The leaves look more willow-like than acer to me. Salix integra?


That's it! Many thanks.


Glad we've found it.

Why do I sit and wonder about these things when there's a digital camera
sitting there? Partly because I can never get that tinypic link thing to
work. No change there then :-)


I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo
slowly that it's best to go off and do something else!


And in the form it was given above it doesn't work if the browser has
JavaScript disabled.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley

Chris Hogg 02-11-2007 08:38 PM

Tree ID
 
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha
wrote:


I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo
slowly that it's best to go off and do something else!


Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.


--
Chris

E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net

Sacha 02-11-2007 10:32 PM

Tree ID
 
On 2/11/07 20:38, in article ,
"Chris Hogg" wrote:

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha
wrote:


I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo
slowly that it's best to go off and do something else!


Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.


Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is
required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's
a terrifically useful site.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Stuart Noble 03-11-2007 08:30 AM

Tree ID
 
Sacha wrote:
On 2/11/07 20:38, in article ,
"Chris Hogg" wrote:

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha
wrote:


I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo
slowly that it's best to go off and do something else!

Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.


Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is
required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's
a terrifically useful site.


I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to
do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into
your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been

http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg

rather than

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1


I think...

It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup

Sacha 03-11-2007 10:00 AM

Tree ID
 
On 3/11/07 08:30, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

Sacha wrote:
On 2/11/07 20:38, in article ,
"Chris Hogg" wrote:

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha
wrote:


I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but
sooooooo
slowly that it's best to go off and do something else!
Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.


Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is
required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's
a terrifically useful site.


I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to
do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into
your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been

http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg

rather than

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1


I think...

It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup


I've tried playing around with photos using the software on the Mac and last
time I did that they all disappeared 'somewhere' and the whole system just
kept crashing. I only just found them a few days ago. But I'm getting a
new Mac soon and am getting a techie to install stuff for me from here to
the new one in the hope all will go smoothly. At the same time, I'll ask
him about this playing around with photo software. He's actually going to
run a few classes for Mac users so perhaps that could be one of the issues,
if he's willing to use it.


--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Granity 03-11-2007 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart Noble
[color=darkred

I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo
slowly that it's best to go off and do something else!
[/color]
Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.
[/i][/color]

Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is
required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's
a terrifically useful site.[/i][/color]

I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to
do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into
your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been

http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg


rather than

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1


I think...

It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup

Try http://photobucket.com/ instead of tinypic, you can post a link straight to a full sized image for example: http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i1...singham018.jpg

Stuart Noble 03-11-2007 02:11 PM

Tree ID
 
Sacha wrote:
On 3/11/07 08:30, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

Sacha wrote:
On 2/11/07 20:38, in article ,
"Chris Hogg" wrote:

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha
wrote:


I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but
sooooooo
slowly that it's best to go off and do something else!
Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.

Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is
required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's
a terrifically useful site.

I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to
do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into
your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been

http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg
rather than

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1

I think...

It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup


I've tried playing around with photos using the software on the Mac and last
time I did that they all disappeared 'somewhere' and the whole system just
kept crashing. I only just found them a few days ago. But I'm getting a
new Mac soon and am getting a techie to install stuff for me from here to
the new one in the hope all will go smoothly. At the same time, I'll ask
him about this playing around with photo software. He's actually going to
run a few classes for Mac users so perhaps that could be one of the issues,
if he's willing to use it.


And I thought Macs were so trouble free :-)

Sacha 03-11-2007 02:43 PM

Tree ID
 
On 3/11/07 14:11, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote:

snip

I've tried playing around with photos using the software on the Mac and last
time I did that they all disappeared 'somewhere' and the whole system just
kept crashing. I only just found them a few days ago. But I'm getting a
new Mac soon and am getting a techie to install stuff for me from here to
the new one in the hope all will go smoothly. At the same time, I'll ask
him about this playing around with photo software. He's actually going to
run a few classes for Mac users so perhaps that could be one of the issues,
if he's willing to use it.


And I thought Macs were so trouble free :-)


It's the Mac user that's the problem here, I think. ;-)

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
(remove weeds from address)
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Sally Thompson 03-11-2007 04:18 PM

Tree ID
 
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:57:19 +0000, Granity wrote
(in article ):


Stuart Noble

Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.


Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is
required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless,
it's
a terrifically useful site.


I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to

do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into
your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been
-
[image: http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg]-

rather than
-
http://tinyurl.com/2hxvl2-

I think...

It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup[/i]


Try http://photobucket.com/ instead of tinypic, you can post a link
straight to a full sized image for example: http://tinyurl.com/yryap9[/i][/color]


Can I add my "me too" to that. I much prefer Photobucket, and have far fewer
problems reading the images there.

(Nice pic by the way.)


--
Sally in Shropshire, UK
Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church with conservation
churchyard:
http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk



Stuart Noble 03-11-2007 04:19 PM

Tree ID
 
Granity wrote:
Stuart Noble

Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera
to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g.
e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to
download.


Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is
required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless,
it's
a terrifically useful site.


I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to

do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into
your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been
-
[image: http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg]-

rather than
-
http://tinyurl.com/2hxvl2-

I think...

It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup[/i]


Try http://photobucket.com/ instead of tinypic, you can post a link
straight to a full sized image for example: http://tinyurl.com/yryap9



[/i][/color]
But I'm too lazy to log on and remember yet another password. It does
have the advantage of keeping a record of what you've uploaded though


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter