Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
Hope someone can identify this for me
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1 It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it. Thanks for any info. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
On 2/11/07 15:12, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote: Hope someone can identify this for me http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1 It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it. Thanks for any info. The leaves look more willow-like than acer to me. Salix integra? -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
Sacha wrote:
On 2/11/07 15:12, in article , "Stuart Noble" wrote: Hope someone can identify this for me http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1 It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it. Thanks for any info. The leaves look more willow-like than acer to me. Salix integra? That's it! Many thanks. Why do I sit and wonder about these things when there's a digital camera sitting there? Partly because I can never get that tinypic link thing to work. No change there then :-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
On 2/11/07 16:31, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote: Sacha wrote: On 2/11/07 15:12, in article , "Stuart Noble" wrote: Hope someone can identify this for me http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1 It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it. Thanks for any info. The leaves look more willow-like than acer to me. Salix integra? That's it! Many thanks. Glad we've found it. Why do I sit and wonder about these things when there's a digital camera sitting there? Partly because I can never get that tinypic link thing to work. No change there then :-) I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo slowly that it's best to go off and do something else! -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
In message , Sacha
writes On 2/11/07 16:31, in article , "Stuart Noble" wrote: Sacha wrote: On 2/11/07 15:12, in article , "Stuart Noble" wrote: Hope someone can identify this for me http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1 It's been around for a few years and is still only waist high. I'm told it's an acer but I can't find anything remotely resembling it. Thanks for any info. The leaves look more willow-like than acer to me. Salix integra? That's it! Many thanks. Glad we've found it. Why do I sit and wonder about these things when there's a digital camera sitting there? Partly because I can never get that tinypic link thing to work. No change there then :-) I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo slowly that it's best to go off and do something else! And in the form it was given above it doesn't work if the browser has JavaScript disabled. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha
wrote: I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo slowly that it's best to go off and do something else! Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g. e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to download. -- Chris E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
On 2/11/07 20:38, in article ,
"Chris Hogg" wrote: On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha wrote: I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo slowly that it's best to go off and do something else! Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g. e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to download. Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's a terrifically useful site. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
On 3/11/07 08:30, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote: Sacha wrote: On 2/11/07 20:38, in article , "Chris Hogg" wrote: On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha wrote: I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo slowly that it's best to go off and do something else! Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g. e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to download. Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's a terrifically useful site. I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg rather than http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1 I think... It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup I've tried playing around with photos using the software on the Mac and last time I did that they all disappeared 'somewhere' and the whole system just kept crashing. I only just found them a few days ago. But I'm getting a new Mac soon and am getting a techie to install stuff for me from here to the new one in the hope all will go smoothly. At the same time, I'll ask him about this playing around with photo software. He's actually going to run a few classes for Mac users so perhaps that could be one of the issues, if he's willing to use it. -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
Sacha wrote:
On 3/11/07 08:30, in article , "Stuart Noble" wrote: Sacha wrote: On 2/11/07 20:38, in article , "Chris Hogg" wrote: On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:14:21 +0000, Sacha wrote: I've only recently learned about that but usually find it works but sooooooo slowly that it's best to go off and do something else! Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g. e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to download. Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's a terrifically useful site. I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg rather than http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=4zc34zt&s=1 I think... It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup I've tried playing around with photos using the software on the Mac and last time I did that they all disappeared 'somewhere' and the whole system just kept crashing. I only just found them a few days ago. But I'm getting a new Mac soon and am getting a techie to install stuff for me from here to the new one in the hope all will go smoothly. At the same time, I'll ask him about this playing around with photo software. He's actually going to run a few classes for Mac users so perhaps that could be one of the issues, if he's willing to use it. And I thought Macs were so trouble free :-) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
On 3/11/07 14:11, in article ,
"Stuart Noble" wrote: snip I've tried playing around with photos using the software on the Mac and last time I did that they all disappeared 'somewhere' and the whole system just kept crashing. I only just found them a few days ago. But I'm getting a new Mac soon and am getting a techie to install stuff for me from here to the new one in the hope all will go smoothly. At the same time, I'll ask him about this playing around with photo software. He's actually going to run a few classes for Mac users so perhaps that could be one of the issues, if he's willing to use it. And I thought Macs were so trouble free :-) It's the Mac user that's the problem here, I think. ;-) -- Sacha http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk South Devon (remove weeds from address) 'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.' |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 11:57:19 +0000, Granity wrote
(in article ): Stuart Noble Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g. e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to download. Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's a terrifically useful site. I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been - [image: http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg]- rather than - http://tinyurl.com/2hxvl2- I think... It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup[/i] Try http://photobucket.com/ instead of tinypic, you can post a link straight to a full sized image for example: http://tinyurl.com/yryap9[/i][/color] Can I add my "me too" to that. I much prefer Photobucket, and have far fewer problems reading the images there. (Nice pic by the way.) -- Sally in Shropshire, UK Burne-Jones/William Morris window in Shropshire church with conservation churchyard: http://www.whitton-stmarys.org.uk |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Tree ID
Granity wrote:
Stuart Noble Depends on the size of the pic file you're uploading. Set your camera to it's lowest resolution for pictures you're going to upload (e.g. e-mail setting) and it's much quicker. Also quicker for the viewer to download. Oh certainly but sometimes with plants, quite a good bit of detail is required and the quicker uploads don't always give that. Nonetheless, it's a terrifically useful site. I reduce the picture dimensions via software because I always forget to do it on the camera, but which of the 4 tinypic codes you paste into your message isn't clear. In my case it should have been - [image: http://i12.tinypic.com/4qj0thi.jpg]- rather than - http://tinyurl.com/2hxvl2- I think... It's certainly a useful facility for this type of newsgroup[/i] Try http://photobucket.com/ instead of tinypic, you can post a link straight to a full sized image for example: http://tinyurl.com/yryap9 [/i][/color] But I'm too lazy to log on and remember yet another password. It does have the advantage of keeping a record of what you've uploaded though |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dig up tree root from large Cedar tree without Killing Tree? | Gardening | |||
Mulberry tree and foundations (was Love my Mulberry tree!!!) | Gardening | |||
Tallow Tree was Peach Tree & Crepe Murtle Questions | Texas | |||
Tree Expert - Can you identify this tree | Lawns | |||
Free tree from Austin EnergyCity tree trimming | Texas |