GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   United Kingdom (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/)
-   -   Gardeners World presenter? (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/175026-gardeners-world-presenter.html)

Sacha[_3_] 30-05-2008 11:44 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
On 30/5/08 11:24, in article ,
"Martin" wrote:

On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:51:08 +0100, Sacha wrote:

On 30/5/08 10:48, in article
,
"Martin" wrote:

On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:36:43 +0100, Sacha wrote:

Absolutely NOT Gay Search! I never saw her do anything more than snip a
few
things with secateurs and her voice drives me up the wall. Phew, sorry!

So Roy it is. :o)


Roy?


Typo!

Ray.


Ah! I thought you were meaning Roy Lancaster, which would be rather
difficult!

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Sacha[_3_] 30-05-2008 11:45 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
On 30/5/08 11:25, in article net, "Kate
Morgan" wrote:


Absolutely NOT Gay Search! I never saw her do anything more than snip
a few
things with secateurs and her voice drives me up the wall. Phew,
sorry!

So Roy it is. :o)

Roy?

My vote would go to someone like Timothy Walker but I doubt he would be
interested
--
Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall


Well whoever get the job I don't suppose he/she will be universally liked
but it makes an amusing thread.
We could have Kim Wilde and she could sing us a song or two and she does not
seem to be so up herself like some of the others :-)

kate

I suppose it's a question of finding someone with some design abilities but
mainly with real plant knowledge. But that's just my view. As you say,
everyone will have a pov on whoever get the job!

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Charlie Pridham[_2_] 30-05-2008 12:54 PM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
In article ,
says...
On 30/5/08 11:25, in article
net, "Kate
Morgan" wrote:


Absolutely NOT Gay Search! I never saw her do anything more than snip
a few
things with secateurs and her voice drives me up the wall. Phew,
sorry!

So Roy it is. :o)

Roy?

My vote would go to someone like Timothy Walker but I doubt he would be
interested
--
Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall


Well whoever get the job I don't suppose he/she will be universally liked
but it makes an amusing thread.
We could have Kim Wilde and she could sing us a song or two and she does not
seem to be so up herself like some of the others :-)

kate

I suppose it's a question of finding someone with some design abilities but
mainly with real plant knowledge. But that's just my view. As you say,
everyone will have a pov on whoever get the job!


It the main problem with a 30 min one size fits all program, There really
should be a beginners slot with lots of ideas, an alotment/veg gardening
half hour and something on actual gardens. you can't begin to please
everyone in 30 mins, I liked geoff Hamilton but quickly tired of being
shown how to plant a tree!!
With all the channels they now have you would have thought it doable
--
Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall
www.roselandhouse.co.uk
Holders of national collections of Clematis viticella cultivars and
Lapageria rosea

Sacha[_3_] 30-05-2008 01:23 PM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
On 30/5/08 12:54, in article ,
"Charlie Pridham" wrote:

In article ,
says...
On 30/5/08 11:25, in article
net, "Kate
Morgan" wrote:


Absolutely NOT Gay Search! I never saw her do anything more than snip
a few
things with secateurs and her voice drives me up the wall. Phew,
sorry!

So Roy it is. :o)

Roy?

My vote would go to someone like Timothy Walker but I doubt he would be
interested
--
Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall

Well whoever get the job I don't suppose he/she will be universally liked
but it makes an amusing thread.
We could have Kim Wilde and she could sing us a song or two and she does not
seem to be so up herself like some of the others :-)

kate

I suppose it's a question of finding someone with some design abilities but
mainly with real plant knowledge. But that's just my view. As you say,
everyone will have a pov on whoever get the job!


It the main problem with a 30 min one size fits all program, There really
should be a beginners slot with lots of ideas, an alotment/veg gardening
half hour and something on actual gardens. you can't begin to please
everyone in 30 mins, I liked geoff Hamilton but quickly tired of being
shown how to plant a tree!!
With all the channels they now have you would have thought it doable


If they're clever, they will have a beginner's programme for those wishing
to grow their own food. Sales of veg. Seeds have soared in the last few
years and now outstrip sales of flower seeds. Something that teaches the
newbie right from scratch, with or without a greenhouse etc., would probably
go very well if it was put on at a time when young people are home from work
and can watch it. And it should be seasonal too, IMO, as in "it's March and
these are the seeds that should be going in now and in two weeks time you'll
be doing x, y and z".
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



stuart noble 30-05-2008 01:43 PM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
Charlie Pridham wrote:

It the main problem with a 30 min one size fits all program, There really
should be a beginners slot with lots of ideas, an alotment/veg gardening
half hour and something on actual gardens. you can't begin to please
everyone in 30 mins, I liked geoff Hamilton but quickly tired of being
shown how to plant a tree!!
With all the channels they now have you would have thought it doable


But it would cost too much (mainly because of the celebrity's salary
demands probably).

Amethyst Deceiver 30-05-2008 04:06 PM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
In article ,
says...

If they're clever, they will have a beginner's programme for those wishing
to grow their own food. Sales of veg. Seeds have soared in the last few
years and now outstrip sales of flower seeds. Something that teaches the
newbie right from scratch, with or without a greenhouse etc., would probably
go very well if it was put on at a time when young people are home from work
and can watch it. And it should be seasonal too, IMO, as in "it's March and
these are the seeds that should be going in now and in two weeks time you'll
be doing x, y and z".


Young people? Depends on your definition of 'young', I suppose, but most
of the people I know who are getting into growing their own veg are in
their 30s and 40s, mostly 40s. I consider 'young' to be 20s.

Sacha[_3_] 30-05-2008 07:00 PM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
On 30/5/08 16:06, in article ,
"Amethyst Deceiver" wrote:

In article ,
says...

If they're clever, they will have a beginner's programme for those wishing
to grow their own food. Sales of veg. Seeds have soared in the last few
years and now outstrip sales of flower seeds. Something that teaches the
newbie right from scratch, with or without a greenhouse etc., would probably
go very well if it was put on at a time when young people are home from work
and can watch it. And it should be seasonal too, IMO, as in "it's March and
these are the seeds that should be going in now and in two weeks time you'll
be doing x, y and z".


Young people? Depends on your definition of 'young', I suppose, but most
of the people I know who are getting into growing their own veg are in
their 30s and 40s, mostly 40s. I consider 'young' to be 20s.


I'm 62 . My oldest child is 32. Thirties are young to me, especially where
gardening is concerned. A lot of 'young' don't get involved while they're
into child-rearing etc. Happily, that's changing as regard the 30s and
upwards.
--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Dave Liquorice[_2_] 30-05-2008 10:06 PM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:43:22 +0100, stuart noble wrote:

But it would cost too much (mainly because of the celebrity's salary
demands probably).


Hasn't most of the discussion about this being saying that a "celebrity"
is the last person wanted or needed to front the show. What is needed is
some one vaguely presentable and who can talk knowledgeably and
articulately about their favorite subject whilst getting their hands
dirty.

Sacha has some good programme ideas. You could probably cycle round 4
basic genres in a month. 1st week small urban family garden, 2nd week
growing food be that garden or allotment, 3rd week "fashion" gardening,
4th week visit a big "country house" garden/estate. Trouble is without the
same formula every week you'd loose viewers as they'd "never know what was
going to be on".

But why limit this to traditional broadcast? Produce it and pop it on a
subscription website as a streaming download or sell a DVD. Take an advert
in BBC Gardeners World magazine to publicise it... That may even be a
better approach as you could target your 4 productions to your audience
better.

--
Cheers
Dave.




Stan The Man 31-05-2008 01:04 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
On 2008-05-30 02:10:38 +0100, Janet Tweedy said:

I say vote for Mr Smith!


Mr Smith is 80 this year so unlikely to be on anyone else's shortlist.
I love his voice though - and most of my favourite presenters have had
distinctive and compelling voices. Very few (none, to be precise) of
the current crop match up on that score.

FWIW, I'm told that the front-runner for the job is the RHS's Matthew
Wilson, pictured he
http://www.thebookpeople.co.uk/webap...0051_100_94728

But

if popularity with the public wins the day, the unlikely winner is Kim
Wilde, according to the Gardens Illustrated poll at
http://www.gardensillustrated.com/vo...?item_ID=25411

The question asked was 'Who is your favourite gardening presenter?' --
but the Kim Wilde vote makes me suspicious.


Janet Tweedy 31-05-2008 01:15 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
In article , Sacha
writes

What about Gay Search? Or the one that lives up in Lincolnshire, genial
tall bloke but can't remember his name.
I say vote for Mr Smith!


Absolutely NOT Gay Search! I never saw her do anything more than snip a few
things with secateurs and her voice drives me up the wall. Phew, sorry!



Oh that's okay , i was just throwing names into the pot :) think the man
from Lincolnshire was Nigel Colborn?
--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk

Janet Tweedy 31-05-2008 01:16 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
In article , Charlie
Pridham writes
My vote would go to someone like Timothy Walker but I doubt he would be
interested



Ah but would he like vegetable growing and we would have an awful lot of
euphorbia trials!
--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk

Alan 31-05-2008 06:57 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
In message et, Dave
Liquorice wrote
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:43:22 +0100, stuart noble wrote:

But it would cost too much (mainly because of the celebrity's salary
demands probably).


Hasn't most of the discussion about this being saying that a "celebrity"
is the last person wanted or needed to front the show.


A celebrity is exactly the right kind of person for the show. You only
have to listen to a gardening show on the radio to see that the
'experts' rarely agree on anything so having a show presented by one of
these would be biased towards one point of view. Having someone who
knows little about gardening means that you will get a program with many
'guests' and with the presenter asking the kind of searching questions
that the average punter would ask such as: "Why does every garden centre
only have plants that are in flower when they should have plants that
reach their peak when the customer has planted them at home"?


--
Alan
news2006 {at} amac {dot} f2s {dot} com

Sacha[_3_] 31-05-2008 07:29 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
On 31/5/08 06:57, in article , "Alan"
wrote:

In message et, Dave
Liquorice wrote
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:43:22 +0100, stuart noble wrote:

But it would cost too much (mainly because of the celebrity's salary
demands probably).


Hasn't most of the discussion about this being saying that a "celebrity"
is the last person wanted or needed to front the show.


A celebrity is exactly the right kind of person for the show. You only
have to listen to a gardening show on the radio to see that the
'experts' rarely agree on anything so having a show presented by one of
these would be biased towards one point of view. Having someone who
knows little about gardening means that you will get a program with many
'guests' and with the presenter asking the kind of searching questions
that the average punter would ask such as: "Why does every garden centre
only have plants that are in flower when they should have plants that
reach their peak when the customer has planted them at home"?

Don't go to garden centres if that's what you want, go to nurseries. Garden
centres *rely* on plants coming in at their peak and going out almost
immediately. They are, virtually, plant supermarkets and they don't want a
lot of stock lying around because that means they need staff who know how to
tend it. We know from experience that some gcs throw out stuff that they
have had in at its peak but which hasn't sold. There's nothing wrong with
it but they either know it won't sell or they want the space. A large
amount of money is wasted that way and in the end, the customer pays for it.
It is a certain fact that if customers see something in flower they're much
more likely to buy it. The more knowledgeable gardener is aware that you
can buy something in March and wait for it to flower in June. Others,
perhaps gulled by the makeover 'instant' gardening programmes, want to take
home an azalea in flower. Last summer, one of the staff brought a trolley
load of Penstemons down from the 'storage' area that isn't open to the
public. She intended to put them out on display but because they were
coming into flower, people were literally snatching them off the trolley.
That happened twice within 20 minutes and they never did make it to their
intended display.

--
Sacha
http://www.hillhousenursery.co.uk
South Devon
'We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our
children.'



Charlie Pridham[_2_] 31-05-2008 08:40 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
In article ,
says...
On 31/5/08 06:57, in article , "Alan"
wrote:

In message et, Dave
Liquorice wrote
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:43:22 +0100, stuart noble wrote:

But it would cost too much (mainly because of the celebrity's salary
demands probably).

Hasn't most of the discussion about this being saying that a "celebrity"
is the last person wanted or needed to front the show.


A celebrity is exactly the right kind of person for the show. You only
have to listen to a gardening show on the radio to see that the
'experts' rarely agree on anything so having a show presented by one of
these would be biased towards one point of view. Having someone who
knows little about gardening means that you will get a program with many
'guests' and with the presenter asking the kind of searching questions
that the average punter would ask such as: "Why does every garden centre
only have plants that are in flower when they should have plants that
reach their peak when the customer has planted them at home"?

Don't go to garden centres if that's what you want, go to nurseries. Garden
centres *rely* on plants coming in at their peak and going out almost
immediately. They are, virtually, plant supermarkets and they don't want a
lot of stock lying around because that means they need staff who know how to
tend it. We know from experience that some gcs throw out stuff that they
have had in at its peak but which hasn't sold. There's nothing wrong with
it but they either know it won't sell or they want the space. A large
amount of money is wasted that way and in the end, the customer pays for it.
It is a certain fact that if customers see something in flower they're much
more likely to buy it. The more knowledgeable gardener is aware that you
can buy something in March and wait for it to flower in June. Others,
perhaps gulled by the makeover 'instant' gardening programmes, want to take
home an azalea in flower. Last summer, one of the staff brought a trolley
load of Penstemons down from the 'storage' area that isn't open to the
public. She intended to put them out on display but because they were
coming into flower, people were literally snatching them off the trolley.
That happened twice within 20 minutes and they never did make it to their
intended display.


And don't blame the garden centres or nurseries for offering plants in
flower, you try standing all day at a plant sale not selling you plants
which are green and watching a stream of customers carrying off inflower
foxgloves and see how long it takes you to figure that people want stuff
with flower on :~)
Last weekend I took along a display plant in full flower with a tray of
for sale plants of the same thing, everyone wanted the big plant in
flower dispite being told that it would wilt and die if not kept watered
in its pot and if they planted it they would need to cut it off to get it
to establish.
They want flowers and have so little patience (or maybe its confidence in
their ability)they want them now!
We now have to rope off the young plants to stop people buying them as
they come into flower, they will spurn the 3 year old cut back ready to
go plants in favour of just gone in the pot single stem jobs - but the
have a single flower at the top of the stem.
Yet I have to admit when going around other peoples gardens although not
all to my taste they appear perfectly normal! so are the customers as
daft as we think? they seem to get away with buying badly and obviously
enjoy their gardens.
--
Charlie Pridham, Gardening in Cornwall
www.roselandhouse.co.uk
Holders of national collections of Clematis viticella cultivars and
Lapageria rosea

stuart noble 31-05-2008 09:34 AM

Gardeners World presenter?
 
Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:43:22 +0100, stuart noble wrote:

But it would cost too much (mainly because of the celebrity's salary
demands probably).


Hasn't most of the discussion about this being saying that a "celebrity"
is the last person wanted or needed to front the show. What is needed is
some one vaguely presentable and who can talk knowledgeably and
articulately about their favorite subject whilst getting their hands
dirty.


But, as soon as you appear on the tele more than once, you become a
celeb, whether you like it or not. People come up to you in the
supermarket or punch you in night clubs. So you have to move to a gated
community with the other celebs, and must be paid accordingly. You can't
win!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter