Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
urg on GardenSAlley.com (was Weed free garden anyone?)
"Stewart Robert Hinsley" wrote in message ... In message , David Rance writes Sorry, I just don't agree with those who argue in favour of keeping this a usenet-only means of communication. If I were still active in the Fidonet I would port it over to that! WHAT DOES IT MATTER? (I'm not shouting, it's the only means I have of emphasising.) Usenet is in the public domain so no theft, intellectual or otherwise, is taking place. The more we argue about our "rights" the more these sites will endeavour to prove that we have none. The consensus is that participants hold the copyright in their posts. By posting the material to u.r.g. an implicit license is granted. But this does not cover every possible use of the material. IANAL, but it seems to me that in particular if a site that republishes a post is ignoring x-no-archive headers they would be in breach of the implicit license. OTOH, there doesn't seem to be much distinction between Google Groups and Garden Banter, so I never really understood the opposition to Garden Banter. -- Stewart Robert Hinsley Reference your last para, Violet Elizabeth Bott comes to mind Mike -- .................................... It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. .................................... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
weed free garden anyone | United Kingdom | |||
Free Website, Free Domain, Free Installation, Free Scripts | United Kingdom | |||
Duck Weed!! Duck Weed!! Duck Weed!! | Ponds | |||
Help, weed name? Best weed killer? | Gardening | |||
Weed Or Not A Weed? | United Kingdom |