Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
At the risk of being unpopular
In article ,
Jake wrote: Bypassing the 140 limit is easy. By breaking its security or spewing out a sequence of minced-up text? Neither attracts me - the latter because I have used several such systems, and it's horrible to read. It gets REALLY horrible when half a dozen people are doing it at once! Nope. http://www.twitlonger.com/ Which is no different from posting a Web reference to the posting. Alternatively, you simply split a message into a few tweets; just make sure that tweet 2 is sent as a reply to tweet 1, tweet 3 as a reply to tweet 2 and so on. This preserves the sequence and, of course, when you reply to your own tweets you actually "reply" to those to whom you originally tweeted. Recipients simply "view the conversation" to see the tweets in uninterrupted sequence. And how do you stop other people's replies getting interleaved? It is that which is the issue. Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
At the risk of being a bore... | United Kingdom | |||
At the risk of being unpopular | United Kingdom | |||
RISK ASSESSMENT STRATEGY FOR BT CROPS IN THE NETHERLANDS | sci.agriculture | |||
kombucha at home: health risk? | Plant Science | |||
New Scientist - glyphosate, increases the risk of fungal infections | United Kingdom |