Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"David Hill" wrote in message ... ".... Why do people like the answer before the question? ...." Possibly because some people don't seem to know how to EDIT. threads. You get a whole string repeated time after time and possibly just 2 or 3 words added, and I for 1 am sick of having to scroll through anything up to 100 lines to try to find the new bit -- David Hill As someone looking to improve my Usenet skills, I see two problems. I agree with the earlier post that having the 'cart before the horse' does make for poor reading of a thread, but that presupposes that you can read the whole thread in one message, rather than reading the same set of responses over and over again - a real waste of bandwidth, I think. I do also agree with David, that scrolliing through pages of messages & replies, just to read an off topic couple of lines, is a pain - ( which is why I initially welcomed top posts, I admit). Is the answer to have a posting, plus replies, each of which only contains it's own text? We would then not be using bandwidth unnecessarily, and catching up with posts would be quicker. (I appreciate that we are using a variety of Newsgroup clients). Sorry to go off-topic - if anyone can point us to authorative Newsgroup etiquette sources, that would be appreciated. regards, mbb |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
Following up to mbb
Sorry to go off-topic - if anyone can point us to authorative Newsgroup etiquette sources, that would be appreciated. I don't think you need it, your on the right track. Only include what ties your comment in to the thread. (My last post had everything in it as the mix of top and bottom posting was part of the point). I think one of the reasons people don't do this is that they are using a newsreader that does not allow you to:- highlight that which you wish to reply to, then press reply the reply is then set up with the quoted text ready to go. The other thing that bad newsreaders don't do is automatically strip out sig files, especially because they don't allow "-- " to be included (truncating the blank) thereby stopping even good newreaders like Agent from recognising the sig file. -- Mike Reid "Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso UK walking "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" (see web for email) Spain,cuisines and walking "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"mbb" wrote in message ... "David Hill" wrote in message ... ".... Why do people like the answer before the question? ...." Possibly because some people don't seem to know how to EDIT. threads. You get a whole string repeated time after time and possibly just 2 or 3 words added, and I for 1 am sick of having to scroll through anything up to 100 lines to try to find the new bit -- David Hill As someone looking to improve my Usenet skills, I see two problems. I agree with the earlier post that having the 'cart before the horse' does make for poor reading of a thread, but that presupposes that you can read the whole thread in one message, rather than reading the same set of responses over and over again - a real waste of bandwidth, I think. I do also agree with David, that scrolliing through pages of messages & replies, just to read an off topic couple of lines, is a pain - ( which is why I initially welcomed top posts, I admit). Is the answer to have a posting, plus replies, each of which only contains it's own text? We would then not be using bandwidth unnecessarily, and catching up with posts would be quicker. (I appreciate that we are using a variety of Newsgroup clients). Unfortunately it does not work when you get replies to replies and replies to replies to replies and replies which refer to more than one earlier stage of the thread. The only sensible thing is for each contributor to try and snip whatever he/she thinks is irrelevant to what he/she is trying to say. But, *please*, when you snip, it is good manners and useful if you were to replace the snipped part with a simple indication "[snip]". This alerts a subsequent reader to the fact that some snipping has occured, and he/she can look at earlier versions of the thread to see if the snipped stuff was context or not. Sorry to go off-topic - if anyone can point us to authorative Newsgroup etiquette sources, that would be appreciated. Somewhere there must be a set of rules for this newsgroup. In those rules the suggestions for good posting might be listed. That certainly is so in the case of another ng in which I participate. Moreover, the rules of that ng are reposted approximately once monthly. [Franz Heymann] regards, mbb |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... snip Somewhere there must be a set of rules for this newsgroup. In those rules the suggestions for good posting might be listed. That certainly is so in the case of another ng in which I participate. Moreover, the rules of that ng are reposted approximately once monthly. You can check out the "official" netiquette recommendations at http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html 3.1.3 NetNews Guidelines covers news group posting. -- Regards, Alan. Preserve wildlife - Pickle a SQUIRREL to reply. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... snip Somewhere there must be a set of rules for this newsgroup. In those rules the suggestions for good posting might be listed. That certainly is so in the case of another ng in which I participate. Moreover, the rules of that ng are reposted approximately once monthly. You can check out the "official" netiquette recommendations at http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html 3.1.3 NetNews Guidelines covers news group posting. -- Regards, Alan. Preserve wildlife - Pickle a SQUIRREL to reply. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message
from "mbb" contains these words: Is the answer to have a posting, plus replies, each of which only contains it's own text? No, because other users may miss the original post. It's usual for threads to have multiple participants coming and going at different times and broadening the original topic. Posters need to indicate which later contribution they are responding to. (snip) Sorry to go off-topic - if anyone can point us to authorative Newsgroup etiquette sources, that would be appreciated. Don't worry, your question is very welcome. A short version of "how to edit a reply" can be found in a help post that appears here every week, called abc for newcomers. That post is also permanently located in google's archives of this group, search at http://groups.google.com/ (easy help available there). http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting is an excellent guide to how to compose and edit replies. For general netiquette http://groups.google.com/googlegroups/help.html Janet. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message
from "mbb" contains these words: Is the answer to have a posting, plus replies, each of which only contains it's own text? No, because other users may miss the original post. It's usual for threads to have multiple participants coming and going at different times and broadening the original topic. Posters need to indicate which later contribution they are responding to. (snip) Sorry to go off-topic - if anyone can point us to authorative Newsgroup etiquette sources, that would be appreciated. Don't worry, your question is very welcome. A short version of "how to edit a reply" can be found in a help post that appears here every week, called abc for newcomers. That post is also permanently located in google's archives of this group, search at http://groups.google.com/ (easy help available there). http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting is an excellent guide to how to compose and edit replies. For general netiquette http://groups.google.com/googlegroups/help.html Janet. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message from "mbb" contains these words: Is the answer to have a posting, plus replies, each of which only contains it's own text? No, because other users may miss the original post. It's usual for threads to have multiple participants coming and going at different times and broadening the original topic. Posters need to indicate which later contribution they are responding to. Janet. Is it not possible, perhaps with a particular newsreader, to have a root message, and it's replies, posted/delivered only once? I can appreciate that various servers disseminate posts in a disimilar speed, but the duplication of traffic is horrendous - thinks "search for alternative newsreader". thanks to all for comments and info - back to my boy's tomatoes !! regards, mbb |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Alan Gabriel" wrote in message ... "Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... snip Somewhere there must be a set of rules for this newsgroup. In those rules the suggestions for good posting might be listed. That certainly is so in the case of another ng in which I participate. Moreover, the rules of that ng are reposted approximately once monthly. You can check out the "official" netiquette recommendations at http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html 3.1.3 NetNews Guidelines covers news group posting. I would love to see that, but the page appears to be unavailable. [Franz Heymann] |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message from "mbb" contains these words: Is the answer to have a posting, plus replies, each of which only contains it's own text? No, because other users may miss the original post. It's usual for threads to have multiple participants coming and going at different times and broadening the original topic. Posters need to indicate which later contribution they are responding to. (snip) Sorry to go off-topic - if anyone can point us to authorative Newsgroup etiquette sources, that would be appreciated. Don't worry, your question is very welcome. A short version of "how to edit a reply" can be found in a help post that appears here every week, called abc for newcomers. That post is also permanently located in google's archives of this group, search at http://groups.google.com/ (easy help available there). http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting is an excellent guide to how to compose and edit replies. For general netiquette This one is a must. http://groups.google.com/googlegroups/help.html This one is an even muster.... [Franz Heymann] Janet. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
Following up to mbb
Is it not possible, perhaps with a particular newsreader, to have a root message, and it's replies, posted/delivered only once? I can appreciate that various servers disseminate posts in a disimilar speed, but the duplication of traffic is horrendous - thinks "search for alternative newsreader". I don't understand this point. Is the "duplication of traffic" the unsnipped original message in various replies? If so, I don't think anything can be done, or do I miss the point? -- Mike Reid "Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso UK walking "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" (see web for email) Spain,cuisines and walking "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"The Reid" wrote in message ... Following up to mbb Is it not possible, perhaps with a particular newsreader, to have a root message, and it's replies, posted/delivered only once? I can appreciate that various servers disseminate posts in a disimilar speed, but the duplication of traffic is horrendous - thinks "search for alternative newsreader". I don't understand this point. Is the "duplication of traffic" the unsnipped original message in various replies? If so, I don't think anything can be done, or do I miss the point? -- Mike Reid "Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso UK walking "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" (see web for email) Spain,cuisines and walking "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" Indeed it is - looking at this set of messages, each is a copy, (perhaps edited), of what has gone before, with an additional comment, some top posted, some bottom, some humourous, some not so! I'm just hoping that this duplication can be avoided somehow, either by using a clever piece of newsgroup client software, or convention, or even both. What I would hope for is one thread, containing the original posting, with each comment, and the comments to the comments, connnected as part of the one conversation, with no piece of data downloaded from the server more than once. I imagine it also depends on whether you download headers, or complete messages. It's likely that you can capture (almost) all a thread by simply waiting, and picking up one of the last postings in the thread, (but that is also not guaranteed to miss comments, I know). I guess if I never went "broadband", I'd never have noticed,,,,,,,, :¬) regards, mbb |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Franz Heymann" wrote in message ...
"Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message from "mbb" contains these words: Is the answer to have a posting, plus replies, each of which only snip I must be thick.Why are you all using a newsreader.I go to all google from the web and bbc messageboards. No dowloading no setting up and at £10 a month it's not dear.Am I missing something other than offline facility and killfile??? I always thought that the disadvantage of OE was that mail is accepted for transfer from your e mail account so therefore spammers know you exist. Sorry to interrupt but I am an occasional poster. Cheers Ken |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Ken Saunders" wrote in message om... "Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... "Janet Baraclough" wrote in message ... The message from "mbb" contains these words: Is the answer to have a posting, plus replies, each of which only snip I must be thick.Why are you all using a newsreader.I go to all google from the web and bbc messageboards. No dowloading no setting up and at £10 a month it's not dear.Am I missing something other than offline facility and killfile??? I always thought that the disadvantage of OE was that mail is accepted for transfer from your e mail account so therefore spammers know you exist. Sorry to interrupt but I am an occasional poster. Cheers Ken Not if you use a doctored account for usenet like I do. Unfortunately I cottoned on to this trick only after my adress had been harvested, but hopefully my doctored account keeps the spammers at bay. [Franz Heymann] |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... "Alan Gabriel" wrote in message ... "Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... snip Somewhere there must be a set of rules for this newsgroup. In those rules the suggestions for good posting might be listed. That certainly is so in the case of another ng in which I participate. Moreover, the rules of that ng are reposted approximately once monthly. You can check out the "official" netiquette recommendations at http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html 3.1.3 NetNews Guidelines covers news group posting. I would love to see that, but the page appears to be unavailable. I checked the URL before posting and it resolved OK for me. -- Regards, Alan. Preserve wildlife - Pickle a SQUIRREL to reply. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
Personally, when I read the NG's I would prefer top postings, as I already
know the question, I find it irritating having to trawl throught the question again to find the reply. I realise it can get complicated when answers digress from the original question ( as this reply has, in spectacular fashion. Poor Mike Read only got a couple of replies before the thread went barmy!) Mike's original question---- I noticed another allotment always has borage and decided to plant some, but I now note its an annual. Does it self seed? -- Mike Reid Arthur's reply---- Yes - copiously. - Arthur Nick Maclaren's reply--- Only if it likes the conditions - it doesn't establish itself with me. Now, let's see if we get another infernal top poster, and can turn this thread into something totally incomprehensible. Regards, Nick Maclaren. Regards Jeff, oh sorry Mike, I can't help you with your question. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
"Alan Gabriel" wrote in message ... "Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... "Alan Gabriel" wrote in message ... "Franz Heymann" wrote in message ... snip Somewhere there must be a set of rules for this newsgroup. In those rules the suggestions for good posting might be listed. That certainly is so in the case of another ng in which I participate. Moreover, the rules of that ng are reposted approximately once monthly. You can check out the "official" netiquette recommendations at http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html 3.1.3 NetNews Guidelines covers news group posting. I would love to see that, but the page appears to be unavailable. I checked the URL before posting and it resolved OK for me. Perseverance pays. Today it worked for me too. Thanks for the ULR. It is very much worth reading. [Franz Heymann] |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
Following up to Jeff Coles
Poor Mike Read only got a couple of replies before the thread went barmy!) Its OK, i'm enjoying the same old top/bottom debate, just with different people :-) I shall put some borage seed in next spring and assume it will self seed the way it appears to have done on a neighbouring allotment, perhaps one day I will get a chance to ask the owner. It slighlty amazes me that there are several other allotmenters I have only ever seen once or twice even though I go all different times. -- Mike Reid "Art is the lie that reveals the truth" P.Picasso UK walking "http://www.fellwalk.co.uk" (see web for email) Spain,cuisines and walking "http://www.fell-walker.co.uk" |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
In article , The Reid
writes Following up to Jeff Coles Poor Mike Read only got a couple of replies before the thread went barmy!) Its OK, i'm enjoying the same old top/bottom debate, just with different people :-) I shall put some borage seed in next spring and assume it will self seed the way it appears to have done on a neighbouring allotment, perhaps one day I will get a chance to ask the owner. It slighlty amazes me that there are several other allotmenters I have only ever seen once or twice even though I go all different times. Hi I'm not top-posting because you should be able to see my response with no probs! We had borage on our allotment some years ago, which I planted from seed, and it grew to over 5ft high, had absolutely masses of flowers and was covered in bees! It also self-seeded along with the nasturtiums and a large part of the allotment turned into a field of nasturtiums with borage!! I've grown some borage in large pots this year, just stuffed a few seeds in and they all germinated and are now about 2-3ft high and full of lovely flowers, so easy to grow and such spectactular plants, very good value. I didn't plant them until late June or early July (can't quite remember now) and took a chance, which worked as we've had a lot of hot weather I suppose. I planted Empress of India nasturtiums around them (dark red) but they haven't flowered yet although they have grown well enough, so I live in hope! Lynda |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message
from The Reid contains these words: Following up to Jeff Coles Poor Mike Read only got a couple of replies before the thread went barmy!) Its OK, i'm enjoying the same old top/bottom debate, just with different people :-) I shall put some borage seed in next spring and assume it will self seed the way it appears to have done on a neighbouring allotment, perhaps one day I will get a chance to ask the owner. It slighlty amazes me that there are several other allotmenters I have only ever seen once or twice even though I go all different times. Perhaps they go all different times too? Talking of self-set seeds, I started turning some of the lawn in the pocket-handkerchief of my front garden into a bed. Some of the seeds which have germinated there are to be expected: grasses, spurges, dandelions, thistles, violas, etc, but some plants surprise me. Nicotinia - I would not have expected the seeds to have survived the winter, but they almost form a carpet. Foxgloves - dunno where the nearest plant is Lobelia, but no alyssum. Last, but by no means least, a groundnut. Actually, the last one doesn't surprise me too much: assuming the actual peanut to be hardy, about six feet away from where it was growing I put out a net of nuts for the birds when it was cold, and kept it topped-up. -- Rusty http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/tqt.htm horrid·squeak snailything zetnet·co·uk excange d.p. with p to reply. |
Please elaborate
Could someone elaborate on the following quote in simple language for me as I seem to be making all the classic mistakes. I appreciated advice on netiquette as am new to newsgroups. Am ex-hotmail, now uko2 and am not currently beseiged.
"Not if you use a doctored account for usenet like I do. Unfortunately I cottoned on to this trick only after my adress had been harvested, but hopefully my doctored account keeps the spammers at bay. [Franz Heymann]" |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message 3fcea991630c1885209910a206cd3f1a@TeraNews
from hrafndot contains these words: Could someone elaborate on the following quote in simple language for me as I seem to be making all the classic mistakes. I appreciated advice on netiquette as am new to newsgroups. Am ex-hotmail, now uko2 and am not currently beseiged. "Not if you use a doctored account for usenet like I do. Unfortunately I cottoned on to this trick only after my adress had been harvested, but hopefully my doctored account keeps the spammers at bay. If you hit 'reply by e-mail' or whatever your newsreader says to this post, it will bounce. If you want to reply, a working address is provided at the bottom of my posts, as required by AUP* You can use various filters too * Accepted User Policy |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message
from Rusty Hinge contains these words: If you hit 'reply by e-mail' or whatever your newsreader says to this post, it will bounce. If you want to reply, a working address is provided at the bottom of my posts, as required by AUP* You can use various filters too * Accepted User Policy Sorry, forgot about this one: unplugged everything because of an approaching flashtbang weathery thing [1] and it got sent when I reconnected everything. You should be able to create mailboxes in your newsreader. Unless you register them with your ISP they won't work. So, you invent an e-mail address like and post on Usenet using it, the spambots [2] only pick that address. As yet, they haven't been able to access the 'Reply To' field in your header without actually opening the post. [1] Wot missed. :-( [2] robots which trawl through newsgroups and harvest addresses -- Rusty http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/tqt.htm horrid·squeak snailything zetnet·co·uk excange d.p. with p to reply. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message
from Rusty Hinge contains these words: If you hit 'reply by e-mail' or whatever your newsreader says to this post, it will bounce. If you want to reply, a working address is provided at the bottom of my posts, as required by AUP* You can use various filters too * Accepted User Policy Sorry, forgot about this one: unplugged everything because of an approaching flashtbang weathery thing [1] and it got sent when I reconnected everything. You should be able to create mailboxes in your newsreader. Unless you register them with your ISP they won't work. So, you invent an e-mail address like and post on Usenet using it, the spambots [2] only pick that address. As yet, they haven't been able to access the 'Reply To' field in your header without actually opening the post. [1] Wot missed. :-( [2] robots which trawl through newsgroups and harvest addresses -- Rusty http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/tqt.htm horrid·squeak snailything zetnet·co·uk excange d.p. with p to reply. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message
from Rusty Hinge contains these words: If you hit 'reply by e-mail' or whatever your newsreader says to this post, it will bounce. If you want to reply, a working address is provided at the bottom of my posts, as required by AUP* You can use various filters too * Accepted User Policy Sorry, forgot about this one: unplugged everything because of an approaching flashtbang weathery thing [1] and it got sent when I reconnected everything. You should be able to create mailboxes in your newsreader. Unless you register them with your ISP they won't work. So, you invent an e-mail address like and post on Usenet using it, the spambots [2] only pick that address. As yet, they haven't been able to access the 'Reply To' field in your header without actually opening the post. [1] Wot missed. :-( [2] robots which trawl through newsgroups and harvest addresses -- Rusty http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/tqt.htm horrid·squeak snailything zetnet·co·uk excange d.p. with p to reply. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message
from Rusty Hinge contains these words: If you hit 'reply by e-mail' or whatever your newsreader says to this post, it will bounce. If you want to reply, a working address is provided at the bottom of my posts, as required by AUP* You can use various filters too * Accepted User Policy Sorry, forgot about this one: unplugged everything because of an approaching flashtbang weathery thing [1] and it got sent when I reconnected everything. You should be able to create mailboxes in your newsreader. Unless you register them with your ISP they won't work. So, you invent an e-mail address like and post on Usenet using it, the spambots [2] only pick that address. As yet, they haven't been able to access the 'Reply To' field in your header without actually opening the post. [1] Wot missed. :-( [2] robots which trawl through newsgroups and harvest addresses -- Rusty http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/tqt.htm horrid·squeak snailything zetnet·co·uk excange d.p. with p to reply. |
Borage (Off Topic - Top Posting discussion)
The message
from Rusty Hinge contains these words: If you hit 'reply by e-mail' or whatever your newsreader says to this post, it will bounce. If you want to reply, a working address is provided at the bottom of my posts, as required by AUP* You can use various filters too * Accepted User Policy Sorry, forgot about this one: unplugged everything because of an approaching flashtbang weathery thing [1] and it got sent when I reconnected everything. You should be able to create mailboxes in your newsreader. Unless you register them with your ISP they won't work. So, you invent an e-mail address like and post on Usenet using it, the spambots [2] only pick that address. As yet, they haven't been able to access the 'Reply To' field in your header without actually opening the post. [1] Wot missed. :-( [2] robots which trawl through newsgroups and harvest addresses -- Rusty http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/tqt.htm horrid·squeak snailything zetnet·co·uk excange d.p. with p to reply. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter