GardenBanter.co.uk

GardenBanter.co.uk (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/)
-   United Kingdom (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/)
-   -   On Topic post (https://www.gardenbanter.co.uk/united-kingdom/47552-topic-post.html)

Robert 20-11-2003 07:25 PM

On Topic post
 
Just a progress report as there is nothing much going
on.......................... two rows of broad beans are up above the soil,
garlic are shooting, over-wintering onions growing nicely, sweet peas
shooting and a farmer's tractor load of manure safely wheel-barrowed to the
plot last weekend, just a day before the wet weather! Lucky or what lol



shazzbat 20-11-2003 08:23 PM

On Topic post
 

"Robert" wrote in message
...
Just a progress report as there is nothing much going
on.......................... two rows of broad beans are up above the

soil,
garlic are shooting, over-wintering onions growing nicely, sweet peas
shooting and a farmer's tractor load of manure safely wheel-barrowed to

the
plot last weekend, just a day before the wet weather! Lucky or what lol



Yup, now sit back and enjoy our site. You've earned a rest.

http://mysite.freeserve.com/steveandmaggiesplot

Steve



seven 23-11-2003 09:04 PM

On Topic post
 

"Robert" wrote in message
...
Just a progress report as there is nothing much going
on.......................... two rows of broad beans are up above the

soil,
garlic are shooting, over-wintering onions growing nicely, sweet peas
shooting and a farmer's tractor load of manure safely wheel-barrowed to

the
plot last weekend, just a day before the wet weather! Lucky or what lol



and I thought I had it good with my garlic growing!

:o)




Christopher Norton 24-11-2003 04:15 PM

On Topic post
 
Sounds the same as mine but without the manure but with Perpetual Spinach.

Franz Heymann 25-11-2003 12:14 PM

On Topic post
 

"Christopher Norton" wrote in message
...
Sounds the same as mine but without the manure but with Perpetual Spinach.


If you want anybody to understand your posts, you should leave sufficient of
the headers and the context intact to allow the readers to make contact with
what has gone before.

Franz



Christopher Norton 25-11-2003 04:03 PM

On Topic post
 
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these words:


If you want anybody to understand your posts, you should leave sufficient of
the headers and the context intact to allow the readers to make contact with
what has gone before.


Franz


A reply that the OP would have understood. It was`nt necessarily aimed
at the general masses.

PLEASE stop being so picky about everyones method of posting Franz. You
simply sound like you want the world to work how you do. It aint ever
going to happen, so chill your boots and take a wee dram of the good
stuff and don`t worry about how usenet posts look or read.

Franz Heymann 25-11-2003 05:05 PM

On Topic post
 

"Christopher Norton" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these

words:


If you want anybody to understand your posts, you should leave

sufficient of
the headers and the context intact to allow the readers to make contact

with
what has gone before.


Franz


A reply that the OP would have understood. It was`nt necessarily aimed
at the general masses.

PLEASE stop being so picky about everyones method of posting Franz. You
simply sound like you want the world to work how you do. It aint ever
going to happen, so chill your boots and take a wee dram of the good
stuff and don`t worry about how usenet posts look or read.


But my dear Christopher, has it not occurred to you that I would actually
like to understand your posts? Why do you think I bother to ask you to
observe usenet conventions?

Franz




Jaques d'Alltrades 25-11-2003 07:24 PM

On Topic post
 
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these words:
"Christopher Norton" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these

words:

If you want anybody to understand your posts, you should leave

sufficient of
the headers and the context intact to allow the readers to make contact

with
what has gone before.


Franz


A reply that the OP would have understood. It was`nt necessarily aimed
at the general masses.

PLEASE stop being so picky about everyones method of posting Franz. You
simply sound like you want the world to work how you do. It aint ever
going to happen, so chill your boots and take a wee dram of the good
stuff and don`t worry about how usenet posts look or read.


But my dear Christopher, has it not occurred to you that I would actually
like to understand your posts? Why do you think I bother to ask you to
observe usenet conventions?


Children! Behave yourselves!

--
Rusty Hinge http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/tqt.htm

Dark thoughts about the Wumpus concerto played with piano,
iron bar and two sledge hammers. (Wumpus, 15/11/03)

martin 25-11-2003 07:32 PM

On Topic post
 
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:11:15 GMT, Jaques d'Alltrades
wrote:

The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these words:


snipped to protect the innocent

But my dear Christopher, has it not occurred to you that I would actually
like to understand your posts? Why do you think I bother to ask you to
observe usenet conventions?


Children! Behave yourselves!


"Cannabis is not to be sniffed at"
--
Martin

Franz Heymann 25-11-2003 08:32 PM

On Topic post
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these

words:
"Christopher Norton" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these

words:

If you want anybody to understand your posts, you should leave

sufficient of
the headers and the context intact to allow the readers to make

contact
with
what has gone before.

Franz

A reply that the OP would have understood. It was`nt necessarily aimed
at the general masses.

PLEASE stop being so picky about everyones method of posting Franz.

You
simply sound like you want the world to work how you do. It aint ever
going to happen, so chill your boots and take a wee dram of the good
stuff and don`t worry about how usenet posts look or read.


But my dear Christopher, has it not occurred to you that I would

actually
like to understand your posts? Why do you think I bother to ask you to
observe usenet conventions?


Children! Behave yourselves!


Point taken, dad

Franz



Alan Gould 25-11-2003 09:14 PM

On Topic post
 
In article , Christopher Norton
writes

A reply that the OP would have understood. It was`nt necessarily aimed
at the general masses.

All mailings posted to this group are for the attention of everyone.
Any mailing intended to be read by certain individuals only should be
sent privately.
--
Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs.

Franz Heymann 25-11-2003 10:22 PM

On Topic post
 

"Christopher Norton" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these

words:


If you want anybody to understand your posts, you should leave

sufficient of
the headers and the context intact to allow the readers to make contact

with
what has gone before.


Franz


A reply that the OP would have understood. It was`nt necessarily aimed
at the general masses.


Then you should have replied privately by email.
Urg messages are contributions to a general discussion, open to all Urglers.

Franz




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter