This CFV thang..
 

I have been watching 'uk.net.news.config' for the CFV but it only arrived
very recently, along with another 3,000 posts.

There is now a long thread in 'uk.rec.gardening' in response, but none shown
in 'uk.net.news.config'.

I replied to the CFV - which should have cross posted the reply to the 3 NG
in the original posting - but this reply seems to have disappeared.

So is there some strange thing about replying to CFVs, or is Usenet banjaxed
at the moment?

Cheers

Dave R

P.S. I have managed to vote - awaiting confirmation

--

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:
I have been watching 'uk.net.news.config' for the CFV but it only arrived
very recently, along with another 3,000 posts.

There is now a long thread in 'uk.rec.gardening' in response, but none shown
in 'uk.net.news.config'.

I replied to the CFV - which should have cross posted the reply to the 3 NG
in the original posting - but this reply seems to have disappeared.

No, it won't be posted. The reply should be mailed to you automatically.
I hope you used a valid address to reply?

You then snip the bits where instructed, fill in the voting slip, and
e-mail it back to the vote-taker.

So is there some strange thing about replying to CFVs, or is Usenet banjaxed
at the moment?

No. True, one of the replies to my mail did fall in a hole somewhere,
but a replacement was sent as soon as I e-mailed Pedt. You'll find his
official address on the CFV.

HTH

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

Jaques, mon cher ami...

Total misunderstanding.

I posted a reply to the NG - in fact the reply should have been cross posted
to the three NGs listed in the original post.

These were shown in the BG response I posted.

However the posted response has not appeared in uk.rec.gardening nor in
uk.net.news.config.

As I stated in the OP, I have voted. (Just got the confirmation back).

I was puzzled over the failure of my post to appear.

snip

This CFV thang..
 

"David W.E. Roberts" wrote in message
...
I have been watching 'uk.net.news.config' for the CFV but it only arrived
very recently, along with another 3,000 posts.

There is now a long thread in 'uk.rec.gardening' in response, but none
shown
in 'uk.net.news.config'.

I replied to the CFV - which should have cross posted the reply to the 3
NG
in the original posting - but this reply seems to have disappeared.
snip

Part of the headers:

"From: Pedt Scragg
Newsgroups: uk.net.news.announce,uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.gar dening
Subject: 1st CFV : Create unmoderated newsgroup uk.rec.gardening.allotments
Followup-To: poster
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:05:54 +0000
Expires: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:59:59 +0000
Message-ID:

Reply-To: "

Does the line "Followup-To: poster" do strange things?

My post in reply seems destined for the NGs - but then I am using OE which
may do non-standard things :-(

TIA

Dave R

This CFV thang..
 

In message , David W.E.
Roberts writes

"David W.E. Roberts" wrote in message
...
I have been watching 'uk.net.news.config' for the CFV but it only arrived
very recently, along with another 3,000 posts.

There is now a long thread in 'uk.rec.gardening' in response, but none
shown
in 'uk.net.news.config'.

I replied to the CFV - which should have cross posted the reply to the 3
NG
in the original posting - but this reply seems to have disappeared.
snip

Part of the headers:

"From: Pedt Scragg
Newsgroups: uk.net.news.announce,uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.gar dening
Subject: 1st CFV : Create unmoderated newsgroup uk.rec.gardening.allotments
Followup-To: poster
Does the line "Followup-To: poster" do strange things?

My post in reply seems destined for the NGs - but then I am using OE which
may do non-standard things :-(

'Follow-ups to poster' means that the follow-up you post will only be
sent to the original poster of the message you are replying to, unless
you override the follow-ups.
--
Chris French and Helen Johnson, Leeds
urg Suppliers and References FAQ:
http://www.familyfrench.co.uk/garden/urgfaq/index.html

This CFV thang..
 

In message , David W.E.
Roberts writes

"David W.E. Roberts" wrote in message
...
I have been watching 'uk.net.news.config' for the CFV but it only arrived
very recently, along with another 3,000 posts.

There is now a long thread in 'uk.rec.gardening' in response, but none
shown
in 'uk.net.news.config'.

I replied to the CFV - which should have cross posted the reply to the 3
NG
in the original posting - but this reply seems to have disappeared.
snip

Part of the headers:

"From: Pedt Scragg
Newsgroups: uk.net.news.announce,uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.gar dening
Subject: 1st CFV : Create unmoderated newsgroup uk.rec.gardening.allotments
Followup-To: poster
Does the line "Followup-To: poster" do strange things?

My post in reply seems destined for the NGs - but then I am using OE which
may do non-standard things :-(

'Follow-ups to poster' means that the follow-up you post will only be
sent to the original poster of the message you are replying to, unless
you override the follow-ups.
--
Chris French and Helen Johnson, Leeds
urg Suppliers and References FAQ:
http://www.familyfrench.co.uk/garden/urgfaq/index.html

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Does the line "Followup-To: poster" do strange things?

My post in reply seems destined for the NGs - but then I am using OE which
may do non-standard things :-(

It would seem (from my admittedly scant knowledge of the machinations of
OE) as if it is directed back to you by e-mail.

I certainly haven't seen it turn up anywhere, despite a search on your
'From:' address.

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Does the line "Followup-To: poster" do strange things?

My post in reply seems destined for the NGs - but then I am using OE which
may do non-standard things :-(

It would seem (from my admittedly scant knowledge of the machinations of
OE) as if it is directed back to you by e-mail.

I certainly haven't seen it turn up anywhere, despite a search on your
'From:' address.

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:49:32 GMT, Janet Baraclough ..
wrote:

The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply. I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

has anyone else had a problem?

No it worked o.k. for some of us. Perhaps you are in his kill file?
--

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit;
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad

This CFV thang..
 

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:49:32 GMT, Janet Baraclough ..
wrote:

The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply. I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

has anyone else had a problem?

No it worked o.k. for some of us. Perhaps you are in his kill file?
--

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit;
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad

This CFV thang..
 

"Janet Baraclough .." wrote in
message ...
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply. I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

has anyone else had a problem?

Janet.

Perhaps if you create a new email message, and cut and paste into it?

I presume you send via an ISP SMTP server, for onward delivery - is it this
server which is rejecting the email?

HTH

Dave R

This CFV thang..
 

"Janet Baraclough .." wrote in
message ...
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply. I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

has anyone else had a problem?

Janet.

Perhaps if you create a new email message, and cut and paste into it?

I presume you send via an ISP SMTP server, for onward delivery - is it this
server which is rejecting the email?

HTH

Dave R

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from Janet Baraclough .. contains
these words:
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply. I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

You didn't send from the loopback one, did you? Mine got through and
we're using the same ISP.

Both of mine reached base, one ballot paper fell into a hole on the way
back and another made it through.

I wonder whether the recent international trawl for pædos has loused-up
the mail and the news?

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from Janet Baraclough .. contains
these words:
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply. I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

You didn't send from the loopback one, did you? Mine got through and
we're using the same ISP.

Both of mine reached base, one ballot paper fell into a hole on the way
back and another made it through.

I wonder whether the recent international trawl for pædos has loused-up
the mail and the news?

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from Jaques d'Alltrades contains
these words:

The message
from Janet Baraclough .. contains
these words:
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply. I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

You didn't send from the loopback one, did you? Mine got through and
we're using the same ISP.

Tell me what the loop-back one is :-)

The smpt server refusal was to an email posted in Eudora.

I wonder whether the recent international trawl for pædos has loused-up
the mail and the news?

That might explain why my email spam is reduced this week.

Janet

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from Jaques d'Alltrades contains
these words:

The message
from Janet Baraclough .. contains
these words:
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply. I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

You didn't send from the loopback one, did you? Mine got through and
we're using the same ISP.

Tell me what the loop-back one is :-)

The smpt server refusal was to an email posted in Eudora.

I wonder whether the recent international trawl for pædos has loused-up
the mail and the news?

That might explain why my email spam is reduced this week.

Janet

This CFV thang..
 

David W.E. Roberts said:
Jaques, mon cher ami...

Total misunderstanding.

I posted a reply to the NG - in fact the reply should have been cross posted
to the three NGs listed in the original post.
[..]
I was puzzled over the failure of my post to appear.

You crossposted to the moderated group uk.net.net.announce if you
replied to all three groups. Your post would have been rejected for
unna and it then wouldn't appear anywhere due to the way xposting to
a moderated group works.

--
Pedt Scragg
Votetaker, uk.rec.gardening.allotments
Speaking as a member of, not on behalf of, UKVoting

This CFV thang..
 

Jaques d'Alltrades said:
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Does the line "Followup-To: poster" do strange things?

My post in reply seems destined for the NGs - but then I am using OE which
may do non-standard things :-(

It would seem (from my admittedly scant knowledge of the machinations of
OE) as if it is directed back to you by e-mail.

It should go to the Reply-to: *email* address or, failing an explicitly
set one, the From: *email* address of the poster who sent the article.

Replies to the CFV should go to as that
Reply-To: was set in the CFV.

--
Pedt Scragg
Votetaker, uk.rec.gardening.allotments
Speaking as a member of, not on behalf of, UKVoting

This CFV thang..
 

martin said:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:49:32 GMT, Janet Baraclough ..
wrote:

The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:

Reply-To: "

Yeah... well, I've sent a ballot-form request to that address via my
newsreader service, (giving my true address), and got no reply.

See below. The votetaker is not prepared to discuss in public any
problems specific voters may have.

I tried
again via email, and it bounced back with a message "the recipient is
not acceptable to your SMPT server".

has anyone else had a problem?

There shouldn't be. Chapter and verse please and I can pass it to the
UKV co-ordinator if there is a problem.

No it worked o.k. for some of us. Perhaps you are in his kill file?

There are no killfiles on vote requests (or to the votetaker's query
address/internal addresses for the vote).


If anyone has a problem then send an email (*please* do use an email
address unmunged and one that will reach you when a reply is sent) to
the Votetaker's query address for this vote:
as was indicated in the CFV.

--
Pedt Scragg
Votetaker, uk.rec.gardening.allotments
Speaking as a member of, not on behalf of, UKVoting

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from Janet Baraclough .. contains
these words:

You didn't send from the loopback one, did you? Mine got through and
we're using the same ISP.

Tell me what the loop-back one is :-)

Flobalob in your case, foobar in mine. Included in the address after @,
it automatically returns to sender.

The smpt server refusal was to an email posted in Eudora.

Ah. Try ZIMACS

I wonder whether the recent international trawl for pædos has loused-up
the mail and the news?

That might explain why my email spam is reduced this week.

Lucky you.....

Mine dew, my KF is catching nearly all of it now.

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from Janet Baraclough .. contains
these words:

You didn't send from the loopback one, did you? Mine got through and
we're using the same ISP.

Tell me what the loop-back one is :-)

Flobalob in your case, foobar in mine. Included in the address after @,
it automatically returns to sender.

The smpt server refusal was to an email posted in Eudora.

Ah. Try ZIMACS

I wonder whether the recent international trawl for pædos has loused-up
the mail and the news?

That might explain why my email spam is reduced this week.

Lucky you.....

Mine dew, my KF is catching nearly all of it now.

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

"Pedt" "\"@ wrote in message
...
David W.E. Roberts said:
Jaques, mon cher ami...

Total misunderstanding.

I posted a reply to the NG - in fact the reply should have been cross
posted
to the three NGs listed in the original post.
[..]
I was puzzled over the failure of my post to appear.

You crossposted to the moderated group uk.net.net.announce if you
replied to all three groups. Your post would have been rejected for
unna and it then wouldn't appear anywhere due to the way xposting to
a moderated group works.


Pedt,

thanks for that.

Another interesting bit of knowledge to file away.

Does that mean that if you add a moderated NG to a troll thread that all
responses will just diappear?

Cool ;-)

Dave R

This CFV thang..
 

On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:24:35 -0000, "David W.E. Roberts"
wrote:

Another interesting bit of knowledge to file away.

Does that mean that if you add a moderated NG to a troll thread that all
responses will just diappear?

Cool ;-)

You could also set follow up to poster.
--

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit;
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad

This CFV thang..
 

David W.E. Roberts said:

"Pedt" "\"@ wrote in message
...
David W.E. Roberts said:

I was puzzled over the failure of my post to appear.

You crossposted to the moderated group uk.net.net.announce if you
replied to all three groups. Your post would have been rejected for
unna and it then wouldn't appear anywhere due to the way xposting to
a moderated group works.


Hmmm, should have been uk.net.news.announce not uk.net.net.announce

Pedt,

thanks for that.

Another interesting bit of knowledge to file away.

Always useful to know ;-)

Xpost to moderated,unmoderated[,unmoderated] then your post goes by
email to the moderator(s) of the moderated group. If they accept it
then your post appears in all groups. If not accepted then it doesn't
appear anywhere.

Does that mean that if you add a moderated NG to a troll thread that all
responses will just diappear?

Only if they continue the xpost in reply to your article and your
original article was accepted by the moderator so that it can be
replied to. You'd very likely have a ****ed off moderator as well
so I wouldn't recommend it as a means of combating trolls.

--
Pedt

This CFV thang..
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:
I have been watching 'uk.net.news.config' for the CFV but it only
arrived
very recently, along with another 3,000 posts.

There is now a long thread in 'uk.rec.gardening' in response, but none
shown
in 'uk.net.news.config'.

I replied to the CFV - which should have cross posted the reply to the 3
NG
in the original posting - but this reply seems to have disappeared.

No, it won't be posted. The reply should be mailed to you automatically.
I hope you used a valid address to reply?

You then snip the bits where instructed, fill in the voting slip, and
e-mail it back to the vote-taker.

So is there some strange thing about replying to CFVs, or is Usenet
banjaxed
at the moment?

No. True, one of the replies to my mail did fall in a hole somewhere,
but a replacement was sent as soon as I e-mailed Pedt. You'll find his
official address on the CFV.

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

Franz

This CFV thang..
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:
I have been watching 'uk.net.news.config' for the CFV but it only
arrived
very recently, along with another 3,000 posts.

There is now a long thread in 'uk.rec.gardening' in response, but none
shown
in 'uk.net.news.config'.

I replied to the CFV - which should have cross posted the reply to the 3
NG
in the original posting - but this reply seems to have disappeared.

No, it won't be posted. The reply should be mailed to you automatically.
I hope you used a valid address to reply?

You then snip the bits where instructed, fill in the voting slip, and
e-mail it back to the vote-taker.

So is there some strange thing about replying to CFVs, or is Usenet
banjaxed
at the moment?

No. True, one of the replies to my mail did fall in a hole somewhere,
but a replacement was sent as soon as I e-mailed Pedt. You'll find his
official address on the CFV.

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

Franz

This CFV thang..
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "David W.E. Roberts" contains these words:
I have been watching 'uk.net.news.config' for the CFV but it only
arrived
very recently, along with another 3,000 posts.

There is now a long thread in 'uk.rec.gardening' in response, but none
shown
in 'uk.net.news.config'.

I replied to the CFV - which should have cross posted the reply to the 3
NG
in the original posting - but this reply seems to have disappeared.

No, it won't be posted. The reply should be mailed to you automatically.
I hope you used a valid address to reply?

You then snip the bits where instructed, fill in the voting slip, and
e-mail it back to the vote-taker.

So is there some strange thing about replying to CFVs, or is Usenet
banjaxed
at the moment?

No. True, one of the replies to my mail did fall in a hole somewhere,
but a replacement was sent as soon as I e-mailed Pedt. You'll find his
official address on the CFV.

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

Franz

This CFV thang..
 

On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:06:04 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote:


Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

Try again?


And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

Change your news provider to Berlin and try again.
--

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit;
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad

This CFV thang..
 

On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:06:04 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote:


Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

Try again?


And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

Change your news provider to Berlin and try again.
--

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit;
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad

This CFV thang..
 

On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:06:04 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote:


Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

Try again?


And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

Change your news provider to Berlin and try again.
--

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit;
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config, nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

--
Rusty
Open the creaking gate to make a horrid.squeak, then lower the foobar.
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hi-fi/

This CFV thang..
 

Pedt "\"@ said:

If anyone has a problem then send an email (*please* do use an email
address unmunged and one that will reach you when a reply is sent) to
the Votetaker's query address for this vote:
as was indicated in the CFV.

Sigh.

The votetaker cannot respond to queries that have a return address that
resolves to 127.0.0.1 (localhost).

--
Pedt

This CFV thang..
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these
words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The
letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config,
nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

I suspect confusion at the network configuration end.
I complained and repeated my request for voting papers.
I received them within half an hour.
I filled them in and sent them off. (If you are curious, I voted NO)
I received no acknowledgement of receipt of the voting papers.
Instead, I received another set of voting papers after 12 hours.
Do I fill in the second lot, thereby possibly spoiling my vote by attempting
to vote twice?

Franz

This CFV thang..
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these
words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The
letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config,
nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

I suspect confusion at the network configuration end.
I complained and repeated my request for voting papers.
I received them within half an hour.
I filled them in and sent them off. (If you are curious, I voted NO)
I received no acknowledgement of receipt of the voting papers.
Instead, I received another set of voting papers after 12 hours.
Do I fill in the second lot, thereby possibly spoiling my vote by attempting
to vote twice?

Franz

This CFV thang..
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these
words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The
letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config,
nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

I suspect confusion at the network configuration end.
I complained and repeated my request for voting papers.
I received them within half an hour.
I filled them in and sent them off. (If you are curious, I voted NO)
I received no acknowledgement of receipt of the voting papers.
Instead, I received another set of voting papers after 12 hours.
Do I fill in the second lot, thereby possibly spoiling my vote by attempting
to vote twice?

Franz

This CFV thang..
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these
words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The
letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config,
nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

I suspect confusion at the network configuration end.
I complained and repeated my request for voting papers.
I received them within half an hour.
I filled them in and sent them off. (If you are curious, I voted NO)
I received no acknowledgement of receipt of the voting papers.
Instead, I received another set of voting papers after 12 hours.
Do I fill in the second lot, thereby possibly spoiling my vote by attempting
to vote twice?

Franz

This CFV thang..
 

"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these
words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The
letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config,
nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

I suspect confusion at the network configuration end.
I complained and repeated my request for voting papers.
I received them within half an hour.
I filled them in and sent them off. (If you are curious, I voted NO)
I received no acknowledgement of receipt of the voting papers.
Instead, I received another set of voting papers after 12 hours.
Do I fill in the second lot, thereby possibly spoiling my vote by attempting
to vote twice?

Franz

This CFV thang..
 

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:59:07 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote:


"Jaques d'Alltrades" wrote in message
...
The message
from "Franz Heymann" contains these
words:

Something is wrong somewhere.
I sent an ordinary e-mail to ask for voting papers 2 days ago. The
letrter
seems to have gone, but I have not heard anything since.

And why do I still see nothing about a CFV in either uk.net.news.config,
nor
in uk.net.news.announce?

I suspect your ISP...

I suspect confusion at the network configuration end.
I complained and repeated my request for voting papers.
I received them within half an hour.
I filled them in and sent them off. (If you are curious, I voted NO)
I received no acknowledgement of receipt of the voting papers.
Instead, I received another set of voting papers after 12 hours.

because your first request was finally received?

Do I fill in the second lot, thereby possibly spoiling my vote by attempting
to vote twice?

Ask Pedt, the vote taker (??), what to do he has posted here in the
last few days.

--

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit;
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad