|
Soil improvement
In article , Kay Easton
writes But isn't the 'recreational' implied by being part of the .rec hierarchy? Unless perhaps it implies 'recalcitrant'? -- Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs. |
Soil improvement
In article , Jane Ransom
writes In article , Kay Easton writes There is no reference to 'recreational' anything in our charter which states: But isn't the 'recreational' implied by being part of the .rec hierarchy? We want to include in our discussions the views of people such as market gardeners etc as the information they have is invaluable. Their gardening is not recreational! No, but their advice is relevant to recreational gardening, so I think we're OK on that one. -- Kay Easton Edward's earthworm page: http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/edward/index.htm |
Soil improvement
The message
from Alan Gould contains these words: In article , Kay Easton writes But isn't the 'recreational' implied by being part of the .rec hierarchy? Unless perhaps it implies 'recalcitrant'? Doh. Surely in the case of urg, it means recondite. Yours deeply Janet |
Soil improvement
In article , Janet Baraclough.
.. writes Doh. Surely in the case of urg, it means recondite. Reconditioned more likely in the case of some older hands. :-( -- Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs. |
Soil improvement
In article , Kay Easton
writes No, but their advice is relevant to recreational gardening, so I think we're OK on that one. Does continual moving of goal posts count as soil improvement? -- Alan & Joan Gould - North Lincs. |
Soil improvement
On Fri, 7 May 2004 05:44:58 +0100, Alan Gould
wrote: In article , Kay Easton writes No, but their advice is relevant to recreational gardening, so I think we're OK on that one. Does continual moving of goal posts count as soil improvement? On a football pitch? Yes |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:41 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter