Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16   Report Post  
Old 10-06-2004, 03:00 PM
Nick Maclaren
 
Posts: n/a
Default Log cabins


In article . 24, Victoria Clare writes:
| (Nick Maclaren) wrote in
| :
|
| Boggle. Not a technology that is terribly well suited to the UK!
| But the ingredients are certainly cheap (at source).
|
| I'm not sure why log cabins are particularly unsuitable in the UK?

Damp, woodworm and wet rot. We have 4 months in almost every year
where the relative humidity is nearly 100% and the temperature is
above freezing. Without VERY effective timber treatment (CCA etc.)
and/or a VERY effective damp course, softwoods and most hardwoods
rot in short order near the ground.

All of the SURVIVING timber-framed houses have both a fairly high
stone/brick base AND are made out of expensive and durable woods
like oak heartwood.

Furthermore, until very recently, the UK had few of the straight,
narrow-trunked trees that are suitable for building log cabins.
The native trees are almost all the wrong shape, though coppiced
chestnut etc. would do.

| In Devon we have a tradition of houses that are politely described as
| 'thatched cob cottages' - if they were somewhere hotter, I reckon that
| would translate to 'grass roofed mud hut'.

Yup. I have lived in both.

| Tradition or no tradition, mud is a silly building material - a little
| neglect, and they just wash away in the rain. Compared with that, timber
| seems like quite a sensible building material.

Not really. Putting up a mud hut in central Africa or the fens
would have taken a day's work for a couple of men. So what if it
lasts only 2 years? Just build another. Cob is a lot more work,
but it is very damp-resistant.

Log cabins are a LOT more work, and so need to last correspondinly
longer.

| Up the lane from me, there is a bungalow built entirely of wood, which I
| understand is about 20 years old. I wouldn't call it a thing of beauty,
| but it seems reasonably robust.

Look at the foundations again.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
  #19   Report Post  
Old 10-06-2004, 05:39 PM
Nick Maclaren
 
Posts: n/a
Default Log cabins


In article . 24, Victoria Clare writes:
| (Nick Maclaren) wrote in
| :
|
| Boggle. Not a technology that is terribly well suited to the UK!
| But the ingredients are certainly cheap (at source).
|
| I'm not sure why log cabins are particularly unsuitable in the UK?

Damp, woodworm and wet rot. We have 4 months in almost every year
where the relative humidity is nearly 100% and the temperature is
above freezing. Without VERY effective timber treatment (CCA etc.)
and/or a VERY effective damp course, softwoods and most hardwoods
rot in short order near the ground.

All of the SURVIVING timber-framed houses have both a fairly high
stone/brick base AND are made out of expensive and durable woods
like oak heartwood.

Furthermore, until very recently, the UK had few of the straight,
narrow-trunked trees that are suitable for building log cabins.
The native trees are almost all the wrong shape, though coppiced
chestnut etc. would do.

| In Devon we have a tradition of houses that are politely described as
| 'thatched cob cottages' - if they were somewhere hotter, I reckon that
| would translate to 'grass roofed mud hut'.

Yup. I have lived in both.

| Tradition or no tradition, mud is a silly building material - a little
| neglect, and they just wash away in the rain. Compared with that, timber
| seems like quite a sensible building material.

Not really. Putting up a mud hut in central Africa or the fens
would have taken a day's work for a couple of men. So what if it
lasts only 2 years? Just build another. Cob is a lot more work,
but it is very damp-resistant.

Log cabins are a LOT more work, and so need to last correspondinly
longer.

| Up the lane from me, there is a bungalow built entirely of wood, which I
| understand is about 20 years old. I wouldn't call it a thing of beauty,
| but it seems reasonably robust.

Look at the foundations again.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
  #20   Report Post  
Old 18-03-2012, 06:33 PM
Registered User
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan MacCallum View Post
Hi,
Anyone with experience of buying log cabins online
willing to offer advice both on ease of building
and quality of product and supplier.
Ideally looking for something 3m x 3m approx.
On delivery do they tend to dump by roadside and leave you
to get on with it?

Any advice much appreciated

Cheers
--
Duncan MacCallum

I have recently purchased a 3m x 3m log cabin from
Log Cabins For Sale - UK Log Cabins From Only £995
They are based in Liverpool but delivers to me in London
I must say they where so helpfull and a real good strong cabin was supplied and fitted within a few week.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need recommendation for log splitter SELLCOM Tech support Gardening 1 01-02-2004 11:06 PM
Hillhout or solid cabins - which one ? P & J United Kingdom 0 02-05-2003 01:20 PM
Proposal to log trees burned in Biscuit fire faces criticism Daniel B. Wheeler alt.forestry 0 23-03-2003 07:20 PM
Log roll edging Will United Kingdom 2 17-02-2003 09:32 AM
Log dams don't halt erosion Aozotorp alt.forestry 0 04-11-2002 08:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 GardenBanter.co.uk.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Gardening"

 

Copyright © 2017