GardenBanter.co.uk - View Single Post

FrankB · 17-10-2014, 08:37 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening

"Janet" wrote in message
t...
In article ,
lid says...

On 15/10/2014 15:08, Spider wrote:

I think you've done well for the time being. You could have taken out
more wood, but you can always do that in spring when you see the new
growth developing. To be totally honest, I would have completely
removed the oldest branch on the right but, again, you can make a
decision about that in spring.

The rose obviously hasn't been pruned in years, so a severe cut-back
now
might have been too much of a shock to its system. In future years,
and
with a bit more experience, you'll probably be confident enough to cut
back further, but it's fine for now.

It would be a good idea to remove those few dead leaves and other
debris
from under the rose. These will almost certainly be carrying Black
Spot
spores (and perhaps rose rust as well), which can reinfect the shrub.
Perhaps now, but certainly in spring, use a rose fungicide spray in
February/March to completely wash down the rose. This should prevent
those same spores (which will be 'resting' over winter on the stems)
from reinfecting the new growth.

We've got to do some sever pruning too. But I thought we were supposed
to wait until January?

I would wait until December, or when the leaves have fallen and
they've had some frost. Once the leaves have fallen it's easier to see
what to leave and what to take out.

It's so mild just now that pruning could stimulate new growth before
winter, which will be too soft and tender to survive.

I agree. If you have to prune in autumn I'd have waited until the rose at
least became dormant. I don't prune until around late Feb when the buds
begin to swell on the stems. The RHS also recommend pruning roses in late
winter