Thread: Old roses
View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old 07-07-2017, 01:47 PM posted to uk.rec.gardening
Janet Janet is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Jan 2015
Posts: 215
Default Old roses

In article , says...

Chris Hogg wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:20:05 +0100, "Dan S. MacAbre"
wrote:

I have some roses that I quite like, but they're rather old, too. I
wouldn't expect that to be a problem, and it mostly isn't. But some
have formed a large woody lump at the base (not suprising after years of
pruning), and the plants seem only able to make new shoots around it,
coming out horizontally, which doesn't help their habit. I can cut bits
of it away, although I'm not sure that helps; but does it mean that
something else is wrong? It occurred to me that it might be happening
because the plants aren't buried deeply enough (and so not rotting away
where they should)? Or is it time to replace them?


Two things: Why not try taking cuttings?
http://tinyurl.com/ydevb5rq

I would, but I've always assumed the top bits were slower-growing bits
grafted onto a more vigorous root stock,


Grafting is for speedy success in commercial propagation.

and that a cutting wouldn't be
anything like as healthy?


Many "modern" roses will do very well on their own roots, it's
always worth trying a cutting or six.

(This was one of my early-days surprise lessons as a gardener, from a
local hedge of thriving "Peace" roses, all on their own roots, grown
from cuttings by a neighbour with no green fingers).

Most of the roses in my garden are on their own roots and some have
come from previous gardens (Not all of them mine, LOL).

As soon as my new roses get big enough to take cuttings from, they're
next.


Janet.






Has your soil become rose sick? http://tinyurl.com/y7kr92ux


Probably :-) But I didn't think that affected the roses that were
already there. I'll go and read that link anyway.