View Single Post
  #58   Report Post  
Old 26-11-2003, 06:15 PM
Chris Hogg
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT. new antispam laws in the US

On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:41:34 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote:


"Jane Ransom" wrote in message
...
In article , David david.simp
writes

But just about all the return addresses are false Jane,


So how do you account for the fact that we now receive no spam on that
mail box?


You seem to be the only one for whom bouncing leads to reduced spam. I did
not benefit from bouncing, and neither does any of my acquaintances.

Franz

I gave up bouncing a while ago. It didn't seem to reduce the spam and
it just contributes to the junk flying around the internet.


--
Chris

E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net