Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
OT. new antispam laws in the US
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:41:34 +0000 (UTC), "Franz Heymann"
wrote: "Jane Ransom" wrote in message ... In article , David david.simp writes But just about all the return addresses are false Jane, So how do you account for the fact that we now receive no spam on that mail box? You seem to be the only one for whom bouncing leads to reduced spam. I did not benefit from bouncing, and neither does any of my acquaintances. Franz I gave up bouncing a while ago. It didn't seem to reduce the spam and it just contributes to the junk flying around the internet. -- Chris E-mail: christopher[dot]hogg[at]virgin[dot]net |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Even chickens get a better life under new animal laws | United Kingdom | |||
LAWS ABOUT DIVERTING WATER | Ponds | |||
LAWS ABOUT DIVERTING WATER | Ponds | |||
Monsanto Uses Canadian Taxpayer Money to Violate Foreign Laws Case highlights need for strong Biosaf | Gardening | |||
Messy laws | Gardening |