View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old 14-01-2004, 03:44 PM
Kitsune Miko
 
Posts: n/a
Default [IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)

--- Khaimraj Seepersad wrote:
Good Day to All,
General response,

Hmm,the concept of running a race against your self.

Can't fault the idea/philosophy.
Only the sometimes caustic way ideas are expressed.

Yes,I agree,with what is being said,but not the
tone.

In fact I can agree with much of what Andy says,save
it is usually so ---designed to be
argumentative,rather
than thought provoking.

Strange,since he is expressing sensible ideas,but
angering
everyone so much,that no one will listen.
You may now flame me as well.
Khaimraj
West Indies/Caribbean

*At times it feels as though he knows when he will
die to
the minute.Rather like those folk who need to make x
amount
of Bonsai because their 80+ and have only so much
life left.
Forgetting that life is a gift and every day lived -
a blessing.





A judged bonsai exhibit is NOT A CONTEST OF

CONTENTION. "People" do not
"win" a judged bonsai exhibit. Rather, some bonsai

are judged to be
excellent. Period. Let us please get over

ourselves and quit being so
concerned with "who" wins a bonsai contest. There

is no reason for any
names to be associated with the bonsai in a judged

exhibit. The only way
for a judged bonsai exhibit to enhance the endeavor

is for us to recognize
excellent bonsai art - examples from which we

artists and enthusiasts can
learn about excellence. Focusing on this or that

artist does nothing to
enhance our endeavor.

As with the game of golf, it is impossible for one

bonsai artist to "beat"
another in a judged exhibit. Rather, each puts

forth his/her effort and
the
results of that effort are evaluated. In golf, it

is impossible for one
player to "beat" the other. Instead, each plays

his/her best and their
scores are compared at the end. One score is,

according to the
rules/conventions, the better score. These are

individual efforts that are
later evaluated, not competitive efforts that win

at the expense of the
other.

What you seem so attached to is certainly one way

to organize a competition
between artists. However, why can't we ALSO have

the opportunity to simply
compare the artistry, beauty, message, image of

great art and officially
recognize a few of the highest examples in the form

of a judged exhibit?
Here again, we're talking about the ADDITION of an

activity, not
replacement
of one method for another.

I hope that this explanation/plea reaches you (and

others) and I hope that
you can begin to recognize the distinction and the

inherent value in what
I'm describing. Thanks.

Kind regards,
Andy Rutledge
www.andyrutledge.com/palaver/main.htm
zone 8, Texas



************************************************** ******************************
++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark
Zimmerman++++

************************************************** ******************************
-- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ:

http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ --
+++++ Questions? Help? e-mail
+++++


************************************************** ******************************
++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++
************************************************** ******************************
-- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ:
http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ --
+++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++