Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
Original Message: from Craig Cowing:
One last statement: I see nothing wrong with a person who collects bonsai but has them maintained by someone else. To my mind this is no different than a well-off person hiring someone to do their gardening for them. But when it comes to exhibiting a bonsai, especially in a competitive exhibition, I feel the attribution should be given to the artist who maintains the tree as well as the owner. This is no different than an art collector loaning his/her Rembrandt to the Metropolitan, and having the attribution go to Rembrandt, not the collector. This can also advance the art of bonsai by making that particular artist's work better-known, and give them more clients. Craig Cowing -------------- Craig, here you try to hit the nail on the head and, like just about everyone who tries with this point, miss by about 3 yards. What you say here has nothing to do with excellent art or enhancing the art of bonsai. Let me say that again - what you say here has nothing to do with excellent art or enhancing the art of bonsai. Instead, what you express here is the same ridiculous infatuation with "people" getting something in a contest INSTEAD OF bonsai artistry being recognized. There is a difference that I hope you can understand, today or one day soon. A judged bonsai exhibit is NOT A CONTEST OF CONTENTION. "People" do not "win" a judged bonsai exhibit. Rather, some bonsai are judged to be excellent. Period. Let us please get over ourselves and quit being so concerned with "who" wins a bonsai contest. There is no reason for any names to be associated with the bonsai in a judged exhibit. The only way for a judged bonsai exhibit to enhance the endeavor is for us to recognize excellent bonsai art - examples from which we artists and enthusiasts can learn about excellence. Focusing on this or that artist does nothing to enhance our endeavor. As with the game of golf, it is impossible for one bonsai artist to "beat" another in a judged exhibit. Rather, each puts forth his/her effort and the results of that effort are evaluated. In golf, it is impossible for one player to "beat" the other. Instead, each plays his/her best and their scores are compared at the end. One score is, according to the rules/conventions, the better score. These are individual efforts that are later evaluated, not competitive efforts that win at the expense of the other. What you seem so attached to is certainly one way to organize a competition between artists. However, why can't we ALSO have the opportunity to simply compare the artistry, beauty, message, image of great art and officially recognize a few of the highest examples in the form of a judged exhibit? Here again, we're talking about the ADDITION of an activity, not replacement of one method for another. I hope that this explanation/plea reaches you (and others) and I hope that you can begin to recognize the distinction and the inherent value in what I'm describing. Thanks. Kind regards, Andy Rutledge www.andyrutledge.com/palaver/main.htm zone 8, Texas ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
What you seem so attached to is certainly one way to organize a
competition between artists. However, why can't we ALSO have the opportunity to simply compare the artistry, beauty, message, image of great art and officially recognize a few of the highest examples in the form of a judged exhibit? Here again, we're talking about the ADDITION of an activity, not replacement of one method for another. Do you recommend that we carry this scheme over to paintings, sculpture, the ballet, a symphony? Just go to look, touch, or listen with no attribution or frame of reference? Rembrandt, Ravel or Rodin won't care, but there are a lot of living artists who might. And, if _I_ designed trees for someone else and that someone entered a tree I created into an exhibit/competition, I think I'd appreciate a little note beside the tree that said 'twas my work -- just like the collector of one of my whatevers (HA!) would do if she showed it in a whatever exhibition. Collectors collect nice things because of ego (they want to be seen by people to whom they show the collection as a person who has good taste); and few Collectors would allow a tree to be displayed that didn't say: "from the collection of I.M. Rich." And, artists also display their wares because of ego (hoping people will notice how talented they are -- and in the hope that someone will buy something). If collector Jo Blo wants to submit a tree to one of these competitions, she should and the competition should allow her to, with the caveat that John Smith did the work. But, in the end, maybe, someday, someone, somewhere will recognize the fact that IT DOESN'T MATTER! Not a hoot. Jim Lewis - - Tallahassee, FL - The ignorant man marvels at the exceptional; the wise man marvels at the common; the greatest wonder of all is the regularity of nature. -- George Dana Bordman ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
I find it interesting that nobody has attempted to address the
issue of copyrights in this discussion. Creations of any sort are protected by copyright law, conceivably even bonsai, especially those who are maintained rather than developing. Dan Avrin or one of our other legal minds might be able to expound on this. Alan Walker http://bonsai-bci.com http://LCBSBonsai.org -----Original Message----- From: Andy Rutledge Original Message: from Craig Cowing: One last statement: I see nothing wrong with a person who collects bonsai but has them maintained by someone else. To my mind this is no different than a well-off person hiring someone to do their gardening for them. But when it comes to exhibiting a bonsai, especially in a competitive exhibition, I feel the attribution should be given to the artist who maintains the tree as well as the owner. This is no different than an art collector loaning his/her Rembrandt to the Metropolitan, and having the attribution go to Rembrandt, not the collector. This can also advance the art of bonsai by making that particular artist's work better-known, and give them more clients. Craig Cowing -------------- Craig, here you try to hit the nail on the head and, like just about everyone who tries with this point, miss by about 3 yards. What you say here has nothing to do with excellent art or enhancing the art of bonsai. Let me say that again - what you say here has nothing to do with excellent art or enhancing the art of bonsai. Instead, what you express here is the same ridiculous infatuation with "people" getting something in a contest INSTEAD OF bonsai artistry being recognized. There is a difference that I hope you can understand, today or one day soon. A judged bonsai exhibit is NOT A CONTEST OF CONTENTION. "People" do not "win" a judged bonsai exhibit. Rather, some bonsai are judged to be excellent. Period. Let us please get over ourselves and quit being so concerned with "who" wins a bonsai contest. There is no reason for any names to be associated with the bonsai in a judged exhibit. The only way for a judged bonsai exhibit to enhance the endeavor is for us to recognize excellent bonsai art - examples from which we artists and enthusiasts can learn about excellence. Focusing on this or that artist does nothing to enhance our endeavor. As with the game of golf, it is impossible for one bonsai artist to "beat" another in a judged exhibit. Rather, each puts forth his/her effort and the results of that effort are evaluated. In golf, it is impossible for one player to "beat" the other. Instead, each plays his/her best and their scores are compared at the end. One score is, according to the rules/conventions, the better score. These are individual efforts that are later evaluated, not competitive efforts that win at the expense of the other. What you seem so attached to is certainly one way to organize a competition between artists. However, why can't we ALSO have the opportunity to simply compare the artistry, beauty, message, image of great art and officially recognize a few of the highest examples in the form of a judged exhibit? Here again, we're talking about the ADDITION of an activity, not replacement of one method for another. I hope that this explanation/plea reaches you (and others) and I hope that you can begin to recognize the distinction and the inherent value in what I'm describing. Thanks. Kind regards, Andy Rutledge www.andyrutledge.com/palaver/main.htm zone 8, Texas ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
Good Day to All,
General response, Hmm,the concept of running a race against your self. Can't fault the idea/philosophy. Only the sometimes caustic way ideas are expressed. Yes,I agree,with what is being said,but not the tone. In fact I can agree with much of what Andy says,save it is usually so ---designed to be argumentative,rather than thought provoking. Strange,since he is expressing sensible ideas,but angering everyone so much,that no one will listen. You may now flame me as well. Khaimraj West Indies/Caribbean *At times it feels as though he knows when he will die to the minute.Rather like those folk who need to make x amount of Bonsai because their 80+ and have only so much life left. Forgetting that life is a gift and every day lived - a blessing. A judged bonsai exhibit is NOT A CONTEST OF CONTENTION. "People" do not "win" a judged bonsai exhibit. Rather, some bonsai are judged to be excellent. Period. Let us please get over ourselves and quit being so concerned with "who" wins a bonsai contest. There is no reason for any names to be associated with the bonsai in a judged exhibit. The only way for a judged bonsai exhibit to enhance the endeavor is for us to recognize excellent bonsai art - examples from which we artists and enthusiasts can learn about excellence. Focusing on this or that artist does nothing to enhance our endeavor. As with the game of golf, it is impossible for one bonsai artist to "beat" another in a judged exhibit. Rather, each puts forth his/her effort and the results of that effort are evaluated. In golf, it is impossible for one player to "beat" the other. Instead, each plays his/her best and their scores are compared at the end. One score is, according to the rules/conventions, the better score. These are individual efforts that are later evaluated, not competitive efforts that win at the expense of the other. What you seem so attached to is certainly one way to organize a competition between artists. However, why can't we ALSO have the opportunity to simply compare the artistry, beauty, message, image of great art and officially recognize a few of the highest examples in the form of a judged exhibit? Here again, we're talking about the ADDITION of an activity, not replacement of one method for another. I hope that this explanation/plea reaches you (and others) and I hope that you can begin to recognize the distinction and the inherent value in what I'm describing. Thanks. Kind regards, Andy Rutledge www.andyrutledge.com/palaver/main.htm zone 8, Texas ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
Good Day to All,
General response, Hmm,the concept of running a race against your self. Can't fault the idea/philosophy. Only the sometimes caustic way ideas are expressed. Yes,I agree,with what is being said,but not the tone. In fact I can agree with much of what Andy says,save it is usually so ---designed to be argumentative,rather than thought provoking. Strange,since he is expressing sensible ideas,but angering everyone so much,that no one will listen. You may now flame me as well. Khaimraj West Indies/Caribbean *At times it feels as though he knows when he will die to the minute.Rather like those folk who need to make x amount of Bonsai because their 80+ and have only so much life left. Forgetting that life is a gift and every day lived - a blessing. A judged bonsai exhibit is NOT A CONTEST OF CONTENTION. "People" do not "win" a judged bonsai exhibit. Rather, some bonsai are judged to be excellent. Period. Let us please get over ourselves and quit being so concerned with "who" wins a bonsai contest. There is no reason for any names to be associated with the bonsai in a judged exhibit. The only way for a judged bonsai exhibit to enhance the endeavor is for us to recognize excellent bonsai art - examples from which we artists and enthusiasts can learn about excellence. Focusing on this or that artist does nothing to enhance our endeavor. As with the game of golf, it is impossible for one bonsai artist to "beat" another in a judged exhibit. Rather, each puts forth his/her effort and the results of that effort are evaluated. In golf, it is impossible for one player to "beat" the other. Instead, each plays his/her best and their scores are compared at the end. One score is, according to the rules/conventions, the better score. These are individual efforts that are later evaluated, not competitive efforts that win at the expense of the other. What you seem so attached to is certainly one way to organize a competition between artists. However, why can't we ALSO have the opportunity to simply compare the artistry, beauty, message, image of great art and officially recognize a few of the highest examples in the form of a judged exhibit? Here again, we're talking about the ADDITION of an activity, not replacement of one method for another. I hope that this explanation/plea reaches you (and others) and I hope that you can begin to recognize the distinction and the inherent value in what I'm describing. Thanks. Kind regards, Andy Rutledge www.andyrutledge.com/palaver/main.htm zone 8, Texas ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Walker" I find it interesting that nobody has attempted to address the issue of copyrights in this discussion. Creations of any sort are protected by copyright law, conceivably even bonsai, especially those who are maintained rather than developing. Dan Avrin or one of our other legal minds might be able to expound on this. Alan Walker ---------------------- Hi Alan, As a writer, an artist, composer and publisher, copyrights are something that I have to think about now and then. However, in the case of the judged exhibits as I'm trying to describe/champion them there is no need for either the name of the exhibitor or artist to be cited within the context of the exhibit. Clearly some people will simply know who owns which tree(s) or which stand(s) or which companion plant(s) or which scrolls and who trained which tree(s), but the only relevant issue - the only issue of impact on the judging and the viewing experience - is the beauty and artistry of the display. This obviates any issues/trouble of copyright as well as the irrelevant concerns that some have for someone "taking credit for bonsai they've not styled." No one takes credit. We just enjoy and recognize excellent artistry. Kind regards, Andy Rutledge www.andyrutledge.com/palaver/main.htm zone 8, Texas ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
Andy Rutledge wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Walker" I find it interesting that nobody has attempted to address the issue of copyrights in this discussion. Creations of any sort are protected by copyright law, conceivably even bonsai, especially those who are maintained rather than developing. Dan Avrin or one of our other legal minds might be able to expound on this. Alan Walker ---------------------- Hi Alan, As a writer, an artist, composer and publisher, copyrights are something that I have to think about now and then. However, in the case of the judged exhibits as I'm trying to describe/champion them there is no need for either the name of the exhibitor or artist to be cited within the context of the exhibit. Clearly some people will simply know who owns which tree(s) or which stand(s) or which companion plant(s) or which scrolls and who trained which tree(s), but the only relevant issue - the only issue of impact on the judging and the viewing experience - is the beauty and artistry of the display. This obviates any issues/trouble of copyright as well as the irrelevant concerns that some have for someone "taking credit for bonsai they've not styled." No one takes credit. We just enjoy and recognize excellent artistry. Kind regards, Andy Rutledge www.andyrutledge.com/palaver/main.htm zone 8, Texas As long as it isn't a judged contest I have no problem with this sort of exhibit. As I mentioned yesterday, the Yama Ki Bonsai Society has an exhibition every fall at the NY Botanic Gardens, and no names are used, but it isn't a judged exhibition, just an exhibition. So, these kinds of exhibits are already going on. Craig Cowing NY Zone 5b/6a Sunset 37 ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
--- Khaimraj Seepersad wrote:
Good Day to All, General response, Hmm,the concept of running a race against your self. Can't fault the idea/philosophy. Only the sometimes caustic way ideas are expressed. Yes,I agree,with what is being said,but not the tone. In fact I can agree with much of what Andy says,save it is usually so ---designed to be argumentative,rather than thought provoking. Strange,since he is expressing sensible ideas,but angering everyone so much,that no one will listen. You may now flame me as well. Khaimraj West Indies/Caribbean *At times it feels as though he knows when he will die to the minute.Rather like those folk who need to make x amount of Bonsai because their 80+ and have only so much life left. Forgetting that life is a gift and every day lived - a blessing. A judged bonsai exhibit is NOT A CONTEST OF CONTENTION. "People" do not "win" a judged bonsai exhibit. Rather, some bonsai are judged to be excellent. Period. Let us please get over ourselves and quit being so concerned with "who" wins a bonsai contest. There is no reason for any names to be associated with the bonsai in a judged exhibit. The only way for a judged bonsai exhibit to enhance the endeavor is for us to recognize excellent bonsai art - examples from which we artists and enthusiasts can learn about excellence. Focusing on this or that artist does nothing to enhance our endeavor. As with the game of golf, it is impossible for one bonsai artist to "beat" another in a judged exhibit. Rather, each puts forth his/her effort and the results of that effort are evaluated. In golf, it is impossible for one player to "beat" the other. Instead, each plays his/her best and their scores are compared at the end. One score is, according to the rules/conventions, the better score. These are individual efforts that are later evaluated, not competitive efforts that win at the expense of the other. What you seem so attached to is certainly one way to organize a competition between artists. However, why can't we ALSO have the opportunity to simply compare the artistry, beauty, message, image of great art and officially recognize a few of the highest examples in the form of a judged exhibit? Here again, we're talking about the ADDITION of an activity, not replacement of one method for another. I hope that this explanation/plea reaches you (and others) and I hope that you can begin to recognize the distinction and the inherent value in what I'm describing. Thanks. Kind regards, Andy Rutledge www.andyrutledge.com/palaver/main.htm zone 8, Texas ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
--- Khaimraj Seepersad wrote:
Good Day to All, General response, Hmm,the concept of running a race against your self. Can't fault the idea/philosophy. Only the sometimes caustic way ideas are expressed. Yes,I agree,with what is being said,but not the tone. In fact I can agree with much of what Andy says,save it is usually so ---designed to be argumentative,rather than thought provoking. Strange,since he is expressing sensible ideas,but angering everyone so much,that no one will listen. You may now flame me as well. Khaimraj West Indies/Caribbean There is no tone of voice in a email. The reader projects the tone, not the writer. If sensible words are written by the writer and read unsenibly, then who's fault is it? Perhaps tone is provided by the reader before reading. Kitsune Miko ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
[IBC] Judged exhibit lunacy (was: '03 award programs)
--- Craig Cowing wrote:
As long as it isn't a judged contest I have no problem with this sort of exhibit. As I mentioned yesterday, the Yama Ki Bonsai Society has an exhibition every fall at the NY Botanic Gardens, and no names are used, but it isn't a judged exhibition, just an exhibition. So, these kinds of exhibits are already going on. Craig Cowing NY I went to a fantastic show over the past weekend. It was Bay Island Bonsai from Alemeda, California. It was a judged show with guest members invited to show. There were no names, no identification of trees at the exhibits. One looked at these fantastic trees without distraction. There were the small understated trophies included in the winning displays. It was never stated whether the trees were merely owned/collected or significantly workd by the owner/artist. The open, uninterupted displays were only numbered. One had to look in the program for tree identification, even then ownership was not mentioned. As I see it there are several reasons for not identifying who owns the tree, 1) this changes the emphasis of the art from the tree to the possesor 2) we have had thefts in California when it is known where ther are good collections. Thses thefts are comitted when the owner is away usually at a club show. Said in a sweet voice, Did you hear it that way? Kitsune Miko ************************************************** ****************************** ++++Sponsored, in part, by Mark Zimmerman++++ ************************************************** ****************************** -- The IBC HOME PAGE & FAQ: http://www.internetbonsaiclub.org/ -- +++++ Questions? Help? e-mail +++++ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|