simy1 said:

(Pat Kiewicz) wrote in message
news:IcidnedI7PDBLwHdRVn-tA@comc
ast.com...

actually I got that site from the article on the Economist, science
and Tech section. and there they say that suburbs help cicadas, who
prefer the roots of younger trees ( such as those found in suburbs).

We didn't have them in-town in Indiana -- only out in the parks, as far as
I can remember (and I think I would have noticed them in town if they were
there in any number).

You would need to be in an area that had been at least lightly treed two
cycles ago and fairly undisturbed since. I'd think any place that went over
to a typical subdivision (stripped and platted) in the last 17 years would be
cicada-free. Also places where most of the lawns get treated with pesticide
on a regular basis...

Also of interest the evolutionary explanation of why all these broods
choose prime numbers for their periodic emergence (13 or 17 yrs).
Where you around here in 1987, Pat? Are we in or out?

I lived in Shelby Township in Macomb County in 1987; didn't notice any there.

Maybe we'll have some here; I'm in an old sub and we back up to parkland.

--
Pat in Plymouth MI ('someplace.net' is comcast)

Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(attributed to Don Marti)