flaw in Darwin Evolution grafted rootstock
Archimedes Plutonium schreef
May I interject environment into the above.
+ + +
You can interject it, but that does not make it relevant
+ + +
It is the environment itself that is forcing and shaping plant and animal
species
+ + +
There is quite a bit of literature on adaptation
+ + +
to go down a path of becoming too specialist or too generalist.
+ + +
The question of "too" is a different matter entirely
+ + +
But then Darwin Evolution does not count the "factor of environment".
+ + +
You must have the wrong Evolution Theory then
+ + +
So Darwin Evolution is flawed on that account.
+ + +
? ? ?
+ + +
+ + +
As algorithms are something entirely different from rules of thumb, you
may want to choose which you mean?
+ + +
Well Ohms law is not a law of physics. It is a algorithm or rule of thumb.
A slide-ruler ( remember those old cumbersome instruments of the 1970s) is
an algorithm for finding a math answer but seldom gives you the precise and
accurate answer that a math computation gives.
+ + +
Perhaps you should get somebody to introduce you to the concept of
"dictionary" and help you look up words?
+ + +
Let us not be focused on semantics of words, theory, true, false when we
need to focus on Darwin Evolution.
+ + +
That sounds like good advice. Maybe you should take it?
PvR
|