Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
flaw in Darwin Evolution grafted rootstock
Archimedes Plutonium schreef
May I interject environment into the above. + + + You can interject it, but that does not make it relevant + + + It is the environment itself that is forcing and shaping plant and animal species + + + There is quite a bit of literature on adaptation + + + to go down a path of becoming too specialist or too generalist. + + + The question of "too" is a different matter entirely + + + But then Darwin Evolution does not count the "factor of environment". + + + You must have the wrong Evolution Theory then + + + So Darwin Evolution is flawed on that account. + + + ? ? ? + + + + + + As algorithms are something entirely different from rules of thumb, you may want to choose which you mean? + + + Well Ohms law is not a law of physics. It is a algorithm or rule of thumb. A slide-ruler ( remember those old cumbersome instruments of the 1970s) is an algorithm for finding a math answer but seldom gives you the precise and accurate answer that a math computation gives. + + + Perhaps you should get somebody to introduce you to the concept of "dictionary" and help you look up words? + + + Let us not be focused on semantics of words, theory, true, false when we need to focus on Darwin Evolution. + + + That sounds like good advice. Maybe you should take it? PvR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
whether grafted RockElm or rootstock SiberianElm and what roles theyplay | Plant Science | |||
Compounding replacing Darwin Evolution; NOVA show on tetrapods ofDevonian | Plant Science | |||
Compounding replacing Darwin Evolution; NOVA show on tetrapods of Devonian | Plant Science | |||
grafted rootstock | Plant Science | |||
(1) Layering and (2) seed dispersal [Was: grafted rootstock] | Plant Science |