Thread: Naming question
View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old 02-12-2004, 01:36 AM
Al
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, the man-made genera always resolve back to the natural genera in their
makeup when determining the new genera name. It doesn't matter how you mix
the four natural genera in a Ronnyara or how many times species from any of
these four genera are used, if all four are present in a plant's registered
background, then it is a Ronnyara.

If you ever hear the term "nothogenera", it means man-made or artificial
genera. It's new. It's exciting. People are using it! ...Well, one out
of three aint bad.


"Xi Wang" wrote in message
news:JKtrd.407499$%k.162940@pd7tw2no...
As Al pointed out:

Christieara, Chtra. (Aer. x Asctm. x V.)
Ronnyara Rnya. (Aer. x Asctm. x V. x Rhy)


So a cross of the two intergenerics would still only contain only Aer,
Asctm, V, and Rhy - nothing more and nothing less. So wouldn't Chtra. X
Rnya. still be Rnya.? Similar to how Dtps. X Phal. is still considered
Dtps?

Cheers,
Xi