I don't need to support my statements to you. I've never seen you post
anything supporting anything you say, troll boy.

There is a place full of books called a library. Check it out! I had already
cited another reference early in this thread. That make three in all. Go
look them up yourself.

Hortus III was a badly conceived piece of crap compiled mostly by grad
students that did not do the proper research and it was already completely
out-of-date when it was published. As a reference, it is worthless because
it has so many mistakes in it.


"Sean Houtman" wrote in message
news:1106647798.deaa78ddd89b9ac1fce276d0ea8679ae@t eranews...
"Cereus-validus..." wrote in
:

You use Hortus III as your reference?

ROTFLMAO!

Much better to refer to Flora Australiensis and the Flora of New
Zealand for enlightenment. I'm not in the mood for hand holding an
ungrateful.


Hortus III, though old, is still a much better reference than an
argument from authority. Do you really own those two tomes, or did
you google for the most appropriate text for the region?

Rather than laughing, perhaps you could support your statement that
the species under discusion are very different.

Sean