Thanks, everyone, for the info. Eleanor, I'm not sure that the AOL info is
correct; check further. There have been rumors....

Angraecum Veitchii registered by Veitch in 1899! Maybe that is
why he thinks it is not a hybrid.. it is too old for him to wrap
his head around.

Actually, Sue, it's a gal, and she has been trashing everything in sight
lately. We can't figure out what her problem is; initially, we were angered
by the wrong information and slams against our society, but now I wonder if
there is something really wrong there. Sad.

You have parent 1 & 2 backwards - but as you and I know the
record book would name it the same if it were made backward.
Wildcatt says it is registered as Angraecum eburneum x Angraecum
sesquipedale. I say it is a BEAUTIFUL specimen.

Thanks for that! Now, if I could just get my huge sesquipedale to bloom....
It's larger than this Veitchii, has more pups, is as healthy as a horse. No
flowers. I refuse to consign it to the salad shredder. It *will* bloom!

Good Blooming. Louise huh?

I think named after Louise Odom.

Diana