On Tue, 03 May 2005 07:08:58 GMT, (Janet)
wrote:

On Mon, 02 May 2005 20:29:05 +0100, wrote:

Read about the fakes in conservation
www.con-servation.org.uk


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk


Sorry but I meant to seek your permission to use your page, hope you
dont mind.

A very good site which clearly exposes fake conservation, I
particularly like the links which expose the RSPB as CONservation
hooligans who appear to be taking our money and then using it to kill
wildlife. I wrote to the CEO of RSPB and got no reply to my questions
on its killing policies which included the slaughter of the rare black
rats on Lundy and the hedgehogs on Uists, not to mention the
extermination of the UK ruddy duck led by the RSPB etc


www.con-servation.org.uk






The Con in Conservation!
Until the problem of global warming became a reality, conservation
organisations had it all their own way. The word "conservation"
conveyed an air of care, conscience and respectability with people
flocking to support them in their niche and lucrative market.

The wider and damaging impact of their activities on the natural
environment was never questioned.

Not any more!

According to a report by international scientists from eight
countries, more than a million species will become extinct over the
next fifty years because of global warming.

However, there is little chance of combating this problem as long as
governments and conservation charities encourage continued economic
expansion, tourism, and their own single-issue ideals, instead of a
reduction in consumerism.

Well known conservation charities have deftly transformed conservation
into a theme-park culture of aesthetically pleasing woodlands for
recreation, countryside fairs, visitor centres, wildlife viewing
platforms, car parks, formal pathways, etc., now indistinguishable
from the tourist industry and an anathema to conservation.

These organisations are also involved in killing wildlife they deem as
inappropriate because of origin or abundance, described recently in a
national nature magazine as "fascism", in their relentless drive to
satisfy the well paying needs of the planet's most damaging mammal -
man.

The activities of these organisations, and the activities they
encourage in others, are contributing considerably to global warming
and it is a travesty for them to describe themselves as
"conservationists" when they are exploiting the natural environment
for their own limited and idealistic agendas.

The Chief Executive of a well-known UK conservation charity was
recently challenged to provide an "Environmental Impact Assessment" to
show whether its activities, and the activities it encourages in
others, justified its existence in terms of reducing damaging
pollution that contributes to global warming. Not surprisingly, he
didn't respond. That speaks volumes!

If global warming is to be addressed, government needs to divert
funding away from these organisations and introduce unpopular changes
akin to those taken in time of war.

Indeed, global warming could be a war fought until the end of time, as
we know it.

David Stipp"s excellent article at
http://www.fortune.com/fortune/techn...2584-2,00.html
gives a breath-taking insight into the devastating geopolitical and
environmental consequences of global warming.

"Conservation" of the natural environment needs to be redefined and
restricted to the principle of reducing consumption of the planet"s
resources and away from organisations such as national parks and
so-called conservation charities that are responsible for encouraging
much greater environmental damage than any pocket-sized superficial
benefit they provide.

Help remove the Con in Conservation by relinquishing your membership
or association with the fake conservationists and email your friends
and colleagues about this site.

Angus Macmillan
( )





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




- Bio-Politics are Breeding Intorerance
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/biopol.htm
- Open letter to the RSPB
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/rspbol.htm
- More fake conservation from the RSPB
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/morefake.htm
- Destruction of Loch Lomond's Natural Environment
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/lldest.htm
- The Green Energy Con
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/greenene.htm
- A Letter from the Glasgow Herald
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/lettergh.htm
- Fake Conservation and Lundy Island
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/lundy.htm
- "Taking it on" Consultation Paper
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/consult.htm
- Conservation Extremism and Barbarity
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/extr.htm
- The Conservation Nazis
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/consnazi.htm
- CLIMATE CHANGE: IT'S WORSE THAN YOU THINK
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/ccc.htm
- Response to the Woodland Trust National Questionnaire 2004
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/response.htm
- What Is Homo Sapiens' Place in Nature? by Dr M. J. Vandeman
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/whatis.htm
- Interesting exchange on uk.environment.conservation newsgroup
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/ngexch.htm
- Conservationists or Junket Chancers?
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/junket.htm
- The Great Recycling Scam!
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/recycle.htm
- Can you blame America?
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/littlewo.htm
- Woodland Trust Hypocrisy!
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/wthypo.htm
- Scottish Natural Heritage: A Force of Destruction!
http://spaceforum.co.uk/con-servation/snhdest.htm



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The author of this website does not claim to be a conservationist,
but expects those who do to act with honesty and integrity.

Back to the top