View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old 31-03-2006, 10:31 AM posted to alt.home.lawn.garden
Garden Viking
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ground engaging Toro vs JD

Cub 2500 series straight shaft not belt drive? It needs a cast iron trans
because there is no slippage with shaft drive..
HD does not typically "stock" pusher blades as they are special order from
the vendor of the tractors and needs a last name (ie. customer name) to get
it to the store and be paid for.
The arm rests are already falling off in the showroom.
Scotts is made by JD, but does not have the JD deck. Its an MTD deck. Green
and yellow are all JD..
Their website does list the pressurized oil system and filter in their specs
The original poster may be like most "Lawn Tractor" buyers and knows nothing
on the matter and some of them only have about 10,000 sqft of lawn but "just
want a tractor", they just have to have one. It doesn't matter if they are
done in 15 minutes, they have a tractor..
As stated before, most box stores have no one that knows any part of the
products they sell. Don't rely solely on them for info unless you find
someone at either who can accurately sell you one from anywhere.


"Srgnt Billko" wrote in message
...
Follow up from the previous Toro vs JD post:

Neither of those machines ( LX420 and the 125) are suitable for ground
engaging (tiller, garden plow, disc harrow etc) implements. They are best
suited to be used as lawn mowers. If you want to use the machine as a
tractor you would be much better off with a Cub Cadet (MTD) 2500 series
which has the cast iron transaxle as opposed to the pot metal trannys used
on the HD & Lowes Toro & John Deere. Even to use a dozer blade the pot
metal won't stand up. BTW, the Toro dozer blade I have is a lot heavier
than the universal blades I've seen at HD & Lowes. The 2500's also have
a high backed seat w arm rests that becomes more and more important as we
get older or if you are going to spend long periods of time on the
machine.