View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old 06-07-2006, 11:35 PM posted to uk.local.southwest,uk.legal,uk.rec.gardening
Maria
 
Posts: n/a
Default Telephone conferencing


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 23:00:43 +0100, "Martin" wrote:

http://www.onebrickcourt.com/cases.asp?id=58

Bunt V. Tilley, Hancox, Stevens, AOL, Tiscali and BT [2006] EWHC 407 (QB)
Case Date: 10/03/2006

Held

(5) The litigation constituted an abuse of process in accordance
with the principles set out in Jameel v. Dow Jones as there was "no
realistic prospect of a trial yielding any tangible or legitimate

advantage
such as to outweigh the disadvantages for the parties in terms of

expense,
and the wider public in terms of court resources." [Para. 78].


If he had a decent lawyer I think the outcome would have been in his
favour.


The ISPs had a Section 1 defence all along. They were never at risk of
losing.
FFS read the above before bullshitting.