On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 18:11:54 -0600, Eggs Zachtly
wrote:

A. It served it's purpose in the wrong place. What part about that, don't
you understand? There are groups in place *specifically* for testing your
newsreader.

What is hard to understand is how one can be in such a sad state as
to want even reply to a one time "test" on a 4-5 month old dead
post...you can't be that bored can you


B. The reader you've chosen, horribly borks posts and replies, as evident
by the non-compliant quote character you've chosen.

C. Your sig is also still borked. It needs to be behind the proper sig
delimeter "-- " (dash dash space), in order for other readers to strip it
out of replies and/or the original body.

D. You've chosen possibly the worst version of one of the worst
newsreaders, to use.

apparently the suspense is too much for you to handle, I had a melt
down on my usual reader so ran the quick test to see if it was the
reader itself or something that came about with the transfer from
comcast to RR
[borked sig snipped]

Please fix/upgrade/change your newsreader, and learn a bit about how the
USENET works, before making yourself look like a complete idiot. Thanks.

Idiot? Hmm you get your panties in a wad because on the fly I chose
to run a one time test on a dead topic and you have no control of
yourself but to jump up and start mocking my rarely used bork signing
newsreader and probably will feel an impulse to have to respond to
this post, wasting even more valuable "web space"

****warning**** borked sig below



Lar. (to e-mail, get rid of the BUGS!!


Dancing dog is back!
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/smartdog.wmv