Nono. Its just that hybrid regstration deals only with species, not their
varietals. So walkeriana x intermedia doesn't say squat about which color
form or whathaveyou about the parents involved in making the hybrid. Were
they splash petalled? Peloric? Coerulean? I can't remmeber if you have
OrchidWiz, but teh picture of Walkerinter in OW shows a lavendar flower, not
the splash petalled deeply colored one Wendy has. Wendy may always be able
to look up the hybrid name for her plant, but may not always recall what
parents were used to make it, if she only puts Walkerinter on the tag. Plus
IIRC there's something about C. walkeriana 'Pendentive' that some folks
think is a different plant from all other walkerianas. So its nice to know.

K

"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
news:zmtwh.3952$ch1.2843@bigfe9...
Mind 'splainin' this? Is it a taxo change?

Diana


"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
You know, this is probably the one time you shouldn't... or if you do be
sure you write the varieties in the database too. Becasue if you look at
the picture of a normal Walkerinter it looks nothing like yours with the
deep color and the flares from teh var. aquinii parent. And Walkerinter
is such an unimaginative, boring name....

K
"wendy7" wrote in message
...
Aagh!!! Thanks Kathy, this one catches me every time. Am going to fix it
in
the data base right now.

--
Cheers Wendy

No Spam Email Address Invalid

K Barrett wrote:
C Walkerinter, for those of you keeping score at home.

K Barrett

"wendy7" wrote in message
...
Now this tag is a mouthful!
C. walkeriana 'Pendentive' x C intermedia V. aquinii

--
Cheers Wendy

No Spam Email Address Invalid