I do have OW. Love it. I think I missed something in the original post.

Diana

"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
Nono. Its just that hybrid regstration deals only with species, not their
varietals. So walkeriana x intermedia doesn't say squat about which
color form or whathaveyou about the parents involved in making the hybrid.
Were they splash petalled? Peloric? Coerulean? I can't remmeber if you
have OrchidWiz, but teh picture of Walkerinter in OW shows a lavendar
flower, not the splash petalled deeply colored one Wendy has. Wendy may
always be able to look up the hybrid name for her plant, but may not
always recall what parents were used to make it, if she only puts
Walkerinter on the tag. Plus IIRC there's something about C. walkeriana
'Pendentive' that some folks think is a different plant from all other
walkerianas. So its nice to know.

K

"Diana Kulaga" wrote in message
news:zmtwh.3952$ch1.2843@bigfe9...
Mind 'splainin' this? Is it a taxo change?

Diana


"K Barrett" wrote in message
. ..
You know, this is probably the one time you shouldn't... or if you do be
sure you write the varieties in the database too. Becasue if you look
at the picture of a normal Walkerinter it looks nothing like yours with
the deep color and the flares from teh var. aquinii parent. And
Walkerinter is such an unimaginative, boring name....

K
"wendy7" wrote in message
...
Aagh!!! Thanks Kathy, this one catches me every time. Am going to fix
it in
the data base right now.

--
Cheers Wendy

No Spam Email Address Invalid

K Barrett wrote:
C Walkerinter, for those of you keeping score at home.

K Barrett

"wendy7" wrote in message
...
Now this tag is a mouthful!
C. walkeriana 'Pendentive' x C intermedia V. aquinii

--
Cheers Wendy

No Spam Email Address Invalid