urg meet
In message .com,
" writes
On 27 Feb, 23:20, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from Sacha contains these
words:
Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not
included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they
are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much
having to say.
Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree'
or some other such pretentious nonsense!
--
AnneJ
Was that really necessary, why on earth did you make that nasty
comment for - I am gobsmacked!!!
Writing as one of the people Sacha loves to ostracise, I don't think it
was nasty. Just a fair comment.
--
June Hughes
|