In message .com,
" writes
On 27 Feb, 23:20, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from Sacha contains these
words:

Unhappily, recent developments in this group mean that two people are not
included in this open invitation and I feel quite sure they know who they
are, so am going into that no further. It's something I regret *very* much
having to say.

Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a soiree'
or some other such pretentious nonsense!

--
AnneJ

Was that really necessary, why on earth did you make that nasty
comment for - I am gobsmacked!!!

Writing as one of the people Sacha loves to ostracise, I don't think it
was nasty. Just a fair comment.
--
June Hughes

"June Hughes" wrote
" writes
Anne Jackson wrote:
Given this caveat, you cannot actually call it a 'meet' Sacha, since
NO-ONE can ever be excluded from a true meet. Better call it 'a
soiree' or some other such pretentious nonsense!

Was that really necessary, why on earth did you make that nasty
comment for - I am gobsmacked!!!

Writing as one of the people Sacha loves to ostracise, I don't think
it was nasty. Just a fair comment.

Hardly. It was just bitchy and silly. Obviously anyone hosting a meet on
their own property is at liberty to include or exclude anyone they wish.

Really it'd be far pleasanter all round if you and Anne could try and
resist dragging up old arguments and grudges at every turn. It's
unnecessary, and verges on trolling.

--
Sue

In article , Sue
writes

Hardly. It was just bitchy and silly. Obviously anyone hosting a meet on
their own property is at liberty to include or exclude anyone they wish.


Not to mention the fact that if you can't exclude some people from a
meet on your own property then no one would feel happy about holding
them! After all it's not a public Meeting in a Park or Gardens which
would be something completely different.
I didn't know that 'Meet' had a rigid definition! After all (to be
pedantic) an Annual General Meeting excludes all but those on a fully
paid up Membership List.

If people have an objection to a Meeting's venue or Guest List then
perhaps another Meeting could be arranged by someone else to include
those that feel excluded?


--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk

"Janet Tweedy" wrote in message
...
In article , Sue
writes

Hardly. It was just bitchy and silly. Obviously anyone hosting a meet on
their own property is at liberty to include or exclude anyone they wish.


Not to mention the fact that if you can't exclude some people from a meet
on your own property then no one would feel happy about holding them!
After all it's not a public Meeting in a Park or Gardens which would be
something completely different.
I didn't know that 'Meet' had a rigid definition! After all (to be
pedantic) an Annual General Meeting excludes all but those on a fully paid
up Membership List.

If people have an objection to a Meeting's venue or Guest List then
perhaps another Meeting could be arranged by someone else to include those
that feel excluded?


--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk

What ! A meeting of just two people. What a horrible thought if those two
bred:-)

In article , "Rupert (W.Yorkshire)"
writes


What ! A meeting of just two people. What a horrible thought if those two
bred:-)




Well not so unusual. Last Meet I held there were 32 people planned to
come and then 26 dropped out within the preceding week! (Broken limbs,
collecting relatives, colds, work and probably just lost interest!)

We still had a good time and an awful lot of food
--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk

"Janet Tweedy" wrote in message
...
In article , "Rupert (W.Yorkshire)"
writes


What ! A meeting of just two people. What a horrible thought if those two
bred:-)




Well not so unusual. Last Meet I held there were 32 people planned to come
and then 26 dropped out within the preceding week! (Broken limbs,
collecting relatives, colds, work and probably just lost interest!)

We still had a good time and an awful lot of food

What did I miss out on, all that food going to waste!

Alan

"Martin" wrote
or even to exclude those that are at present included?
Martin

It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........

Winner gets a free cream tea :~)
Jenny

On 1 Mar, 18:17, "JennyC" wrote:
"Martin" wrote
or even to exclude those that are at present included?

It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........

It's like a farce without the French bits slap slam door comes
back in kiss slap kiss

Winner gets a free cream tea :~)

Sorry to disappoint you here but I've won a fiver it seems ;o)

On Mar 1, 8:50 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from "JennyC" contains these words:

"Martin" wrote
or even to exclude those that are at present included?
Martin
It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........
Winner gets a free cream tea :~)
Jenny

I'll have a fiver on me and June.

--
AnneJ

What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black?

Judith

On 1 Mar, 21:48, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from "
contains these words:

On Mar 1, 8:50 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from "JennyC" contains these words:
"Martin" wrote:

or even to exclude those that are at present included?
Martin
It's turning into a quiz - guess who's not invited........
Winner gets a free cream tea :~)
Jenny

I'll have a fiver on me and June.

What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black?

Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both of us.

Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G

--
AnneJ

she only appreciates the genuine article so maybe you are right.

Judith

In article .com,
" writes


she only appreciates the genuine article so maybe you are right.

Judith



Or maybe us antiques
--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk

Anne Jackson wrote:

I'll have a fiver on me and June.

What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black?

Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both
of us.

Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G

Please, give it a rest. Perhaps you amuse yourself by your rancid
witterings, mabye you think you amuse others, in truth you are pathetic and
VERY boring.

pk

On Mar 1, 10:34 pm, Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from "p.k." contains these words:

Anne Jackson wrote:

I'll have a fiver on me and June.

What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black?

Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both
of us.

Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G
Please, give it a rest. Perhaps you amuse yourself by your rancid
witterings, mabye you think you amuse others, in truth you are pathetic
and VERY boring.

Pogue mo chone!

--
AnneJ

That was crude,Anne, to all who don;t speak Gaelic, Anne said Kiss my
A***l

How can I translate that, because I am educated. g

p.s. you got the spelling wrong.

Judith

Anne Jackson wrote:
The message from "p.k." contains these
words:
Anne Jackson wrote:

I'll have a fiver on me and June.

What was it you said about blankets, pot, kettle, black?

Oh, but it's Sacha who appears to have an equal dislike of the both
of us.

Perhaps we're not 'pretentious' enough... G

Please, give it a rest. Perhaps you amuse yourself by your rancid
witterings, mabye you think you amuse others, in truth you are
pathetic and VERY boring.

Pogue mo chone!

Alas, from your perspective, I will not descend to your level of abuse.

But thank you for confirming so clearly that you are pathetic and VERY
boring.

Don't bother with another insulting reply, I ain't interested in long futile
flame wars, especially with someone whose head is so far up their own they
could not kiss it if they tried.

oops, I did descend to the level I said I wouldn't, I must develop more
will power!


pk

In article , Anne Jackson
writes


I'll have a fiver on me and June.



You've lost then
--
Janet Tweedy
Dalmatian Telegraph
http://www.lancedal.demon.co.uk