View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old 09-01-2008, 07:34 AM posted to rec.gardens
Billy[_4_] Billy[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by GardenBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,265
Default Tree eradication

In article ,
"George.com" wrote:

"Billy" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"George.com" wrote:

Is there a fence between you & the neighbour? If so, is it low? Does the
fence run alongside a public accessway, footpath etc? How thick are the
saplings?

I am wondering whether in the dead of night you may be able to snap the
*******s off near the base. Do a bit of damage to your garden as well.
You
may need to sacrifice a few plants or damage the odd one that was due to
come out or get pruned back (save doing too much damage your side). Next
morning 'discover' the carnage done to your garden and immediately march
round to confront your neighbour. That will put him on the back foot and
reduce his ability to blame you for snapping his trees.

rob


Another graduate of the Dick Cheney (Lon Chaney?) School of Charm;-)
--


no, I didn't recommend blasting the neighbour in the face during a hunting
trip, merely snapping his trees. Problem with the suggestions posted are the
potential signs of deliberate poisoning. If you can make it look like a
random act of vandalism minimal chance of it being traced back to you.

rob


Oh, what a tangled web you weave, . . .

I'd go for the first idea but leave out the hunting trip and, ask for a
jury of your peers (pet lovers).
--

Billy

Bush & Cheney, Behind Bars
http://www.antiwar.com/eland/index.php?articleid=8282
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush