Thread: keikis
View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old 08-04-2003, 07:56 PM
Ted Byers
 
Posts: n/a
Default keikis

I now have three plants with keikis.

One is a phal (P. Sogo Smith), and it has two developing at the top of the
inflorescences (which had been cut just above the highest node that hadn't
flowered). Now, when it comes time to remove it, do I do so by cutting
between the keiki and the inflorescence supporting it, or do I cut the
inflorescence just below the keiki, leaving part of the inflorescence
attached to the baby? And after this, what is likely to happen with the
remaining inflorescences if they are left in place (and would you recommend
leaving them in place?)?

The second is a nobile type dendrobium. In this case, I am tempted to leave
the keikis in place, and just let them make the plant larger, assuming that
doing so will do no harm. Part of the reason for this is that the keikis on
this plant are the only sign of new growth on it. But Iam curious: Do
keikis produce keikis? I ask because there is, on the larger keiki, a small
growth that is clearly developing into a new shoot but it does not have any
roots that are clearly associated with it. If keikis do not produce keikis
themselves (at least until mature), the only other explanation I can see is
that this keiki is being born with two shoots. Does that happen often? All
of my other nobile type dends have new growths but no keikis. I know what
to do with these things to produce flowers, but, in the case of the specimen
with keikis, what can I do to stimulate it to produce new pseudobulbs
(without putting the keikis at risk)? This, and a second nobile type dend
need to be repotted soon (and I haven't decided whether to use coir or chc -
they are presently in moss), but I am wary of setting back the new growth on
the one, and the keikis on the other. Both seem to be quite robust, but I
have no idea what shape their roots are in (I only bought them a few months
ago).

The third is an epidendrum, and it is putting out what look to be a number
of keikis as well as what looks like new shoots from the higher nodes. Here
too, I am tempted to leave the keikis in place, or order to have a larger
"specimen". I spoke to a vendor at the RBG orchid show about this, and he
confirmed my suspicion that the lower of these growths are keikis. He also
said that there is no good reason not to leave them in place. It seems to
me that doing so will create a visual impression of a rapidly increasing
number of stems, all, or at least most, of which in due course will have
clusters of flowers.

Cheers,

Ted