On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:22:40 +0000, jellybean stonerfish wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:25:36 -0800, CanopyCo wrote:

I guess I am missing something.

I checked out the web page and it looked good enough for me to save for
next spring.
Haven’t looked at every page, but seen that it had value to me
regarding any new plants that I haven’t planted before.

What is the problem?
Just because they use illustration instead of photograph? Not everyone
here is a seasoned gardener, you know.

The problem is Billy snapped, because the original post had the word
"illustration" spelled as "illistrations"

That may have been a spelling error, but I don't think it was. I think
the op was spelling it wrong on purpose. I have noticed these type of
posts in the past in many groups. A short post about a site, and the
post is usually written with spelling or grammar errors. Yet the
spelling and grammar on the site, is ok. I think they do this so the
poster would look like an average person, not the website creator.

sf

I take it back. I went to the site, and notice that it has spelling
errors also. So maybe the poster is the creator of the site. The site
seems fine, and has useful information, I am sure the spelling errors
will be corrected in time. If not then just read past them. The word
"tey" instead of "they" in a sentence is not hard to read. I missed it
the first time, and in my mind saw it as "they". The site is much more
helpful and informative than the garden site billy offers. And the adds
on the site are such small little text links that you can hardly be
bothered by them.

sf