Jeff Thies wrote:
As someone with limited sun space, square foot gardening has some
appeal. Looking at the planting density charts, they look a lot like
suggested plant to plant spacing for normal gardening. The difference
appears to be that row spacing is thrown out.


The spacing that is sensible depends on resource competition. If the soil
has good texture and holds nutrients and water well you can exceed the
density usually given on seed packets etc. If sunlight is not strong don't
go overboard as that will be the limiting factor.

I'm not sure I see many advantages in using raised beds over a well
prepared normal bed.

1) Drainage, very useful in heavy soils
2) Increased depth of soil, with limited top soil you can pile the dirt off
the paths up to give extra depth
3) More accessible, high sides and a flat top to the sides to make a seat
can extend gardening to those who cannot bend or kneel comfortably

I would think that with my lack of late afternoon
to evening sun that the increased density due to the reduced row
spacing would yield less total sun per plant.

Yes

It looks to me that the
real advantages are primarily in water usage, along with easier care.
That's not a big deal for me as I have the drippers and mulch ready,
and the plot is well weeded.

Not entirely


I've been moving plants from seed starters to small pots and
gradually putting these in the ground as they achieve some size. So,
it's not too late to give SFG a try, but I'm not convinced it's worth
my effort. Differing opinions?

Jeff

David