The matter in this document would be a two minute issue if the intent was to
produce legitimate proof. Buying his own free time versus defendant lawyer
time is not sophisticated at all as alluded to by the judge. It is a stall
tactic to settle and or drive up court costs. I personally would like to see
legally staffed firms go the distance.

"Dan Resler" wrote in message
...
The U.S. District Court recently held a status conference in Novak's
original Federal lawsuit. A transcript of this hearing is now available.
It
reveals quite a lot about the nature of the lawsuit and the Court's
perceptions about what is happening.

A copy of this transcript is available at URL
http://petsforum.com/psw/docket/docket55.pdf

For those of you who are not aware of what is going on here, some time ago
I
received really bad service from Pets Warehouse. After complaining to the
company and sharing my experiences on the Aquatic Plants email list,
myself
and others who publicly spoke up about their bad service were sued for
$15,000,000. Read about it at http://petsforum.com/psw . You might also
wish
to peruse the ongoing conversation about the case; search for the "Discuss
the Lawsuit" link at the bottom of http://petsforum.com/psw .

dan
--
Dan Resler email:
Computer Science Dept.
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, VA 23284-3068 USA