On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:31:59 +0100, Sacha wrote:

On 2013-06-30 13:09:38 +0100, Judith said:

On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 08:45:54 -0300, Emma Way wrote:

snip
many thanks Jilly for the pure rubbish - "Emma Way" - yes - off you go now.

For the regulars this is yet a different name from the silly sad person who
posts as Jilly and who has also posted as "Judith in England" in trying to
impersonate me.

You INSIST on answering these people and then complain that they answer
you back. Please - do us all a favour and ignore it!


I am awfully sorry that I answered one of "these people" who was responding to
my query - I thought I would point out that the advice being offered was pure
rubbish.

I now realise that I should not have done that - I should have left the post as
it was, so that unsuspecting people could have followed the advice.

(Could you perhaps tell me how you identify *these people* so that I will not
make the same mistake in the future.)

Also, can you also please tell me when the elections for moderators of u.r.g.
take place: I quite fancy doing what you do (so well).