|
75 or 90 for planted?
Hi Dustin, A lot of this reiterates what Chuck states... You're actually talking about 2 different things here. What happens in a tank dump is that the regulator tries to equalize the pressure on both sides of itself, thereby continuously adding co2 to the aquarium at a rate faster than it can be used. The easiest way to avoid this is to use a needle valve between the regulator and tank. I got the one from Dave Gomberg (wcf.com) and I'm very pleased with it. Now with a tank dump here's what happens. Co2 is added to the tank so fast that most of it escapes to the atmosphere. With a tight fitting aquarium cover the co2 will blanket the waters surface, and prohibit an oxygen exchange. This is what kills the fish. There is no oxygen available at the waters surface since it's all co2. I don't know for certain if this phenomena will happen with a tank that doesn't have a cover on it. The easiest way to avoid a tank dump is to use a needle valve and watch the regulator pressure on the tank side (high gauge) of the regulator. As long as there is co2 liquid in the pressurized tank your pressure will remain constant at somewhere near 800 psi. When all of the liquid is depleted the pressure will start to drop on the high side of the regulator. It's going to take some time for it to get from 800 psi or so to 200-500 psi, where you're getting near the "failure" point of the regulator. I've also read that if this "tank dump" happens damage to the regulator is likely. IME with the "dose rate" I'm using it takes about 2 weeks for the tank to get to 500 psi. At that point I disconnect the regulator and the tank and I take a short ride to the welding shop. The only way to get liquid from the pressurized tank to your aquarium is if the pressurized tank has liquid in it and it falls over. The way I prohibit this is to tie it to the center brace in the tank stand. I think the reference you're speaking of with liquid getting into the aquarium has to do with the sugar/yeast method of generating carbon dioxide. I'm completely green on that subject, and I'll leave that to someone that knows what they're talking about. On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:31:51 -0800, "Dustin" wrote: Alright, By a tank dump then, you are talking about alot of co2 *gas form* comming out all at once and sufficating the fish? I thought you meant liquid comming through and contaminating the water. I called the welding shop, where I bought the co2 tank, and they said the liquid could only come out if there was a tub inside the tank, which is normally only used for large tanks *50gal+* or Paint Ball Tanks. Which needle valve do you prefer, or is there such a thing? Thanks! Dustin "Chuck Gadd" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 02:58:26 -0800, "Dustin" wrote: THanks for the input Cannibul, that I did buy that system. Wish I hadnt know, maybe I can get a refund.... I dont like the idea of loosing all the fish...... was it because he didnt have a needle valve, or because the product is junk? The product is perfectly fine. The problem is that the system doesn't use a needle valve. But even without a needle valve, the system is SAFE, and works fine. The issue is what is known as an "end of tank dump". Co2 regulators are intended to operate with a tank pressure of 800-2000 psi (CO2 pressure will never get that high, it's usually around 800-1000psi). On the regulator, the high pressure gauge is marked in red from 0-600psi. This is because, when the CO2 runs out, the tank pressure drops down. The regulator is unable to properly regulate when the tank pressure is very low. In theory, anything below 600psi is a problem. In practice, I've run my regulator (from Dave Gomberg) down to 300-400psi with no "dump". But in any case, once the pressure drops below the regulators minimum, the regulator looses the ability to regulate the output properly, and the output pressure will rise. Since with the "high pressure system" the pressure directly controls the bubble rate, this rising output pressure results in a CO2 overdose. At the extreme end, the regulator can completely loose control when the tank pressure drops very far. At that point, it would vent all the remaining CO2 in a sudden burst. For all of these cases, simply adding a needle valve will provide a safety net. But, if you keep an eye on the tank pressure, it's easy to notice BEFORE the tank pressure drops very far. Unlike watching your car's gas gauge, the CO2 pressure will remain constant (around 800-1000psi depending on the temp) until the tank is 99% empty. When the CO2 tank is filled, the CO2 is under pressure, and is in a liquid form. As long as ANY liquid CO2 remains in the tank, the pressure stays at that 800-1000psi. Once all the liquid is gone, the pressure will start to drop. On my tank, with a fairly high CO2 flow rate, I would get about a week from the time the pressure first started to drop, till it reached the 600psi mark. So even without a needle-valve, if you glance at the CO2 pressure once every few days, you will see it in time to prevent a problem. On my system, with a needle-valve, I intentionally let the pressure drop all the way down. I run the regulator pressure at about 6psi normally, and then control the bubble rate with the needle-valve. I usually have a bubble rate around 2-3 bubble per second. As the tank pressure dropped below 300psi, the output pressure rose up slowly to about 15-20psi. I never saw a true "end of tank dump" with a big spike in output pressure. And the bubble rate (because of the needle valve) didn't increase much, less than 1 extra bubble per second. Possibly a bigger issue with the Dave Gomberg high pressure system, if it's the same as when I bought mine several years ago, is that the tiny little Eheim diffusor isn't very effective in large tanks. In my 75g, I was unable to get acceptable CO2 levels using it. I ditched the eheim diffusor, added a needle-valve, and built my DIY reactor, and I've been very happy ever since. Chuck Gadd http://www.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua |
75 or 90 for planted?
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 12:49:08 -0600, Joe Ferenchik
wrote: exchange. This is what kills the fish. There is no oxygen available at the waters surface since it's all co2. I don't know for certain if this phenomena will happen with a tank that doesn't have a cover on I've seen a CO2 overdose (not caused by end-of-tank dump, but rather due to a faulty pH probe/controller), which killed a bunch of fish in an open-top tank. The deaths were caused not by lack of O2, but rather by the massive amount of CO2. ride to the welding shop. The only way to get liquid from the pressurized tank to your aquarium is if the pressurized tank has liquid in it and it falls over. Even then you probably wouldn't get liquid CO2 out. It would be stopped by the regulator, but it might damage the regulator. Chuck Gadd http://www.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua |
75 or 90 for planted?
Chuck,
Is your CO2 flowing at the same rate all the time? I seem to recall sometime ago, you mentioned that you leave your CO2 going even at night. If this is the case, how much PH fluctuation do you normally see during any given 24 hour period? I saw an article on your site regarding constructing a wet/dry filter. I assume you use a wet/dry filter, right? Does this sort of filtration allow you to more easily stabilize input and outgo of CO2 in the water? I wonder if this makes CO2 injection without a controller easier.. what is your feeling on this? If you were to use a different filter, like a canister filter that is enclosed and therefore not amenable to CO2 dissipation, do you think it would be more difficult to regulate CO2 (without a controller)? Just curious. I personally would have a much harder time maintaining conditions in my tank without a controller, since I am not near my tank much during the week. A controller has worked well for me for the past couple of years. -Bruce Geist "Chuck Gadd" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 12:49:08 -0600, Joe Ferenchik wrote: exchange. This is what kills the fish. There is no oxygen available at the waters surface since it's all co2. I don't know for certain if this phenomena will happen with a tank that doesn't have a cover on I've seen a CO2 overdose (not caused by end-of-tank dump, but rather due to a faulty pH probe/controller), which killed a bunch of fish in an open-top tank. The deaths were caused not by lack of O2, but rather by the massive amount of CO2. ride to the welding shop. The only way to get liquid from the pressurized tank to your aquarium is if the pressurized tank has liquid in it and it falls over. Even then you probably wouldn't get liquid CO2 out. It would be stopped by the regulator, but it might damage the regulator. Chuck Gadd http://www.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua |
75 or 90 for planted?
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:41:29 -0500, "Bruce Geist"
wrote: controler. Are you able to set your flow rate and let it go for a while without fear, or do your really need to check it often during a day? How I haven't looked at or adjusted the bubble rate in at least several months. long does it take you to get re-set after swapping out your CO2 cylinder? I don't change the needle-valve or regulator setting when swapping out the cylinder, so it doesn't take any time to get it re-set. Every week or so, I check the pH, and I glance in the CO2 reactor. If the pH is out of line, or if the amount of CO2 swirling around in the reactor doesn't look right, I might tweak the needle valve slightly. that little bit of a swing without a controller. I think the best I ever did was about .5 swing, which I thought might start killing fish A pH swing won't kill fish. Extremely high CO2 levels might, but a small pH variation due to CO2 levels won't effect fish. The cases where pH changes can hurt the fish are when the different pH is due to different levels of hardness. Chuck Gadd http://www.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua |
75 or 90 for planted?
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:27:01 -0500, "Bruce Geist"
wrote: Is your CO2 flowing at the same rate all the time? yes sometime ago, you mentioned that you leave your CO2 going even at night. If this is the case, how much PH fluctuation do you normally see during any given 24 hour period? 6.8 during the day, 6.6 in the AM before the lights come on.. I saw an article on your site regarding constructing a wet/dry filter. I assume you use a wet/dry filter, right? Does this sort of filtration allow you to more easily stabilize input and outgo of CO2 in the water? I wonder if this makes CO2 injection without a controller easier.. what is your Possibly. In a tank with the absolute minimum CO2 loss, it's reasonable to expect slightly higher CO2 accumulation during the night. I don't know that it's really necessary to maintain extremely stable CO2 levels. In nature, it's common for nighttime CO2 levels to be higher than daytime levels. This is a natural swing. In fact, this natural CO2 swing might even be beneficial to plant growth. Here's a study that found improved growth when CO2 levels were allowed to drift higher at night: http://www.co2science.org/journal/2002/v5n4b1.htm Chuck Gadd http://www.csd.net/~cgadd/aqua |
75 or 90 for planted?
6.8 during the day, 6.6 in the AM before the lights come on..
My PH fluctuates from 6.65 to 6.75 with the controler-- which is really not that much less variance than what you have been able to achieve without a controler. Are you able to set your flow rate and let it go for a while without fear, or do your really need to check it often during a day? How long does it take you to get re-set after swapping out your CO2 cylinder? Possibly. In a tank with the absolute minimum CO2 loss, it's reasonable to expect slightly higher CO2 accumulation during the night. I don't know that it's really necessary to maintain extremely stable CO2 levels. In nature, it's common for nighttime CO2 levels to be higher than daytime levels. This is a natural swing. In fact, this natural CO2 swing might even be beneficial to plant growth. Here's a study that found improved growth when CO2 levels were allowed to drift higher at night: http://www.co2science.org/journal/2002/v5n4b1.htm Interesting article. Thanks. (I am amazed there is journal called "CO2 Science", glad to know about it.) A .2 variation is nothing! I don't know that I ever succeeded in getting that little bit of a swing without a controller. I think the best I ever did was about .5 swing, which I thought might start killing fish (especially since that is the BEST I ever did). Well if I ever re-do my CO2 system, I may try getting a wet/dry filter and (probably more importantly) a better CO2 regulator/needle valve. I have trouble at times getting a consistent flow through my regulator/needle valve combination, particularly after I change the CO2 tank -Bruce Geist |
75 or 90 for planted?
you might want to think about acryllic tanks for this size, it will make
them far lighter, and the rounded edges look nice "Dustin" wrote in message ... Thanks for the input you two :) I bought a 125 gallon today on sale at the lfs, I got a better discount since I am friends with the manager, 599.00 Im guessing that is a good price :) Any suggestions for lighting this for plant growth? :) Thanks! "Bruce Geist" wrote in message ... I have a 135 gallon tank that is 24 inches high. Leigh, as usual, gives excellent adivce. She (I hope you are a she Leigh-- if not then I appologise in advance..) is right about the light, though I find that even though its tougher to light the bottom of the tank, 25 inches is not insurmoutable-- especially if you are going to terrace. In addition, I personally think that less than 24 inches looks a little funny with a canopy. You may (or may not) choose to place a canopy over the top of the tank-- but assess how you think it may look with the shallower tank in the event you do want a canopy. Keep in mind also that there may be plants that you want to keep that get tall. It may be nice to have certain sections of the tank that are deeper than others. Just keep in mind that you may have trouble with high light plants in the deep areas. Certainly the "long arms" issue is real also. If you are a small person, then you may want to avoid buying a tank that is too deep for you to reach into. I know my wife would have a hard time reaching the bottom of my 135 gallon tank. I do not have a problem with this depth-- though any deeper would become a hassel. In summay, my cutoff would be about 24 inches-- not 21 inches. 25 inches may be problematic, but its worthy of careful consideration. For what its worth, that is my 2 cents. -Bruce Geist LeighMo wrote in message ... Id like a 75 or 90 from all-glass. Which of these is better for the planted aquarium in yoru optinion, and where is the best tank for my buck? any orders, or something to that effect? Ordinarily, bigger is better, but for a planted tank, I'd go with the 75 gallon. The 90 and the 75 have the same "footprint." The only difference is the 75 is 21" high, and the 90 is just over 25" high. A planted tank deeper than 24" can be difficult. That depth is hard to light adequately. (You wouldn't think only a few inches would make a difference, but it does, because light intensity falls exponentially with distance.) A planted tank also requires constant maintenance, and if the tank is that deep, it will be difficult (unless you have really long arms!). I've heard of people who accidentally poisoned all their fish, because they reached into a deep tank without showering first, and their underarm deodorant got into the tank. As for price...mail order for a tank this size is not economical. The shipping will kill you. Your best bet is probably to order it from a chain like PetCo. The big chains use tanks as "loss leaders," selling them at a loss in hopes that they'll make it up by selling you fish, accessories, etc. Call around your LFSs and ask, but IME, the small local shops will all charge hundreds of dollars more than the big chains. The local shops around here all wanted $700 to $800 for an All-Glass 75 gallon economy tank and stand. PetCo asked $325 for tank, stand, and glass canopy top. Leigh http://www.fortunecity.com/lavender/halloween/881/ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GardenBanter