The answer to the above is scietifically reasoned out in the below
link.

http://www.spiritualresearchfoundati...possession.php

Bliss on all.

Seek Divine

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.gardens/post

On 29 May 2007 01:54:43 -0700, SeekDivine
wrote:

The answer to the above is scietifically reasoned out in the below
link.

http://www.spiritualresearchfoundati...possession.php

Bliss on all.

Seek Divine

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.gardens/post

Buddhists have been saying this for ions. Plants are not sentient
beings, but sentient beings can definitely reside in a plant. It's
one of the lowest of the hell realms and very difficult to get out of,
once in.

The answer to the above is scietifically reasoned out in the below
link.
http://www.spiritualresearchfoundati...earch/difficul...

Forgive me, but this is nonsense. There's nothing"scientific" about
this. Animals and plants can't be "possessed" by anything, because
there is nothing to possess them. See Richard Dawkins _The God
Delusion_.

It's like that person who said that there was a 50/50 chance that the
snake thing would word. IMO, there is only so much chance that that
will "work" as there is that it will rain in the natural course of
events. In others words, if the weatherman says there is a 40% chance
of rain, then the snake thing has a 40% chance of "working."

In other words, it will have no affect whatsoever.

In article . com,
texas_gardener wrote:

In others words, if the weatherman says there is a 40% chance
of rain, then the snake thing has a 40% chance of "working."

We call them "weather guessers" but otherwise this is faultless logic.
- Bill
Coloribus gustibus non disputatum (mostly)