An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."


Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and


"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "


In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".



If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. He think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I guess last names are too
confusing for him.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
10/29/10 5:42 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."


Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and


"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "


In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".



If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. He think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I guess last names are too
confusing for him.

Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Oct 29, 8:58*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
10/29/10 5:42 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."

Aftfer these "bug" *type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and

"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "

In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".

If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is *"*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. *Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. *He think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. *I guess last names are too
confusing for him.

Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. *So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
* multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
* http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. *I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. *The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. *He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. *Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

....
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. *So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
* multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
* http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. *I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. *The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. *He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. *Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. Poor kid.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Oct 29, 9:21*pm, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

...





Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. *So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
* multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
* http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. *I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. *The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. *He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. *Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. *Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. *But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. *Poor kid.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:25 PM:

On Oct 29, 9:21*pm, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

...





Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. *So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
* multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
* aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
* http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. *I not only
proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. *The fact I helped
Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and
created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. *He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. *Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white
world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. *Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. *But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. *Poor kid.

Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

See how you whine about Carroll and I arguing... when the reality is you do
much of what he does. I just wish the two of you could grow up a little and
find some way to become honest and honorable. Not gonna happen though, is
it?


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

"Snit" wrote in message
.. .
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:25 PM:

On Oct 29, 9:21 pm, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

...





Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So
he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and
white
he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is
obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only
proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it -
down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The fact I helped
Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and
created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his
socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. He
cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read
*some*
posts without reading all. Another sign of Steve's extreme black and
white
world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with
hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I know things
he
does not. Poor kid.

Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

See how you whine about Carroll and I arguing... when the reality is you
do
much of what he does. I just wish the two of you could grow up a little
and
find some way to become honest and honorable. Not gonna happen though, is
it?


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]


Snit begs for my attention

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

"Snit" wrote in message
.. .
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
10/29/10 5:42 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."


Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and


"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "


In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".



If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. He
think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I guess last names are too
confusing for him.

Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and
white
he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only
proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The fact I helped
Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and
created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. He cannot
understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some*
posts without reading all. Another sign of Steve's extreme black and
white
world view.

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]



I am surprise you stopped thinking of incest long enough to beg for my
attention.

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On 10/29/10 8:21 PM, Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. Poor kid.


Pratt is begging for your attention by calling you a fag.

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Snit wrote:
MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:

...
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view.
So he (and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black
and white he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit
what is obvious: he was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple
aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not
only proved to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how
to do it - down to showing him how and when to use what keyboard
keys. The fact I helped Steve was, to him, offensive, so he - as he
does so often - trolled me and created another army of socks to
"help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his
socks), Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his
posts. He cannot understand how it cannot be black and white - how
someone can read *some* posts without reading all. Another sign of
Steve's extreme black and white world view.

Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're
100. GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the
WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with
hatred, I go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I
know things he does not. Poor kid.

You helped Steve by saying it was a bug and user error because you are an
idiot.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Oct 29, 8:55*pm, Chance Furlong wrote:
On 10/29/10 8:21 PM, Snit wrote:

MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:
Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're 100.
GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with hatred, I
go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I know things he
does not. *Poor kid.

Pratt is begging for your attention by calling you a fag.

Well... Snit did finally admit that his "wife" is a man:

"Sandman has tracked down my wife's email and started sending him
bizarre accusations"

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....7?dmode=source

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 10/29/10 5:42 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."


Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user
error. Undoubtedly."

... and


"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "


In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".



If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't
this person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he
himself has labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an
example of "user error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his
hatred for you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he
blames you. He think you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I
guess last names are too confusing for him.

Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So
he (and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and
white he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is
obvious: he was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be
made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only
proved to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do
it - down to showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The
fact I helped Steve was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so
often - trolled me and created another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his
socks), Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts.
He cannot understand how it cannot be black and white - how someone
can read *some* posts without reading all. Another sign of Steve's
extreme black and white world view.

Can you add a few thousand words to your essay, Snot?

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Oct 29, 8:55 pm, Chance Furlong wrote:
On 10/29/10 8:21 PM, Snit wrote:

MuahMan stated in post
on
10/29/10 6:18 PM:
Jesus H Christ. You two faggots will still be arguing when you're
100. GET A ****ING LIFE. You two are the most lifeless ****s on
the WWW.

Hey, I jumped in to *help* Steve. Even though he is consumed with
hatred, I go out of my way to help him. But it offends Steve that I
know things he does not. Poor kid.

Pratt is begging for your attention by calling you a fag.

Well... Snit did finally admit that his "wife" is a man:

"Sandman has tracked down my wife's email and started sending him
bizarre accusations"

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....7?dmode=source

Snot is a fag.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Oct 29, 6:58*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
10/29/10 5:42 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both List
view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."

Aftfer these "bug" *type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user error.
Undoubtedly."

... and

"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories about
the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "

In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".

If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't this
person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he himself has
labeled as a "bug" in OSX is *"*undoubtedly*" an example of "user
error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his hatred for
you. *Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he blames you. *He think
you and Steve Jobs are the same person. *I guess last names are too
confusing for him.


(snip some BS by Snit)


* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same

Yup... it's what you called a "bug"... an "inconsistency".

- the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way. *

You recognize this, yet, you're saying the "error" here is mine. LOL!

Hint: This is an Apple "error".

While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

And, notably, you're *still* calling it a "bug"... an
"inconsistency"... while you simultaneously call it my "user error".

Put the crack pipe down now, Snit;)

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. *

Apple did something even you admit is inconsistent... I pointed it
out... and you call me lost. What meds can you possibly be mixing
together that would get you this high? LOL!

Steve showed he was

.... right about the "inconsistency" of OSX, that you're labeling a
"bug"? Yes, I did show that.


Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks),
Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts.

It's far more than obvious that you read all of my posts. People just
aren't as stupid as you need them to be.

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Oct 29, 6:58 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 10/29/10 5:42 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
Recently, a person on this newsgroup, who claims to be a Mac user,
wrote the following statements on the same issue (making aliases in
OSX) :

"It is true, though, that the bug he has found exists with both
List view and Column view. "

... and

"Yup, you found a bug Steve."

Aftfer these "bug" type statements this Mac user then wrote these
kinds of statements on this issue:

"And Steve wants people to now believe that this does not work the
same on ?his machine... when the problem is *undoubtedly* user
error. Undoubtedly."

... and

"The problem is user error. But Steve likes to make up stories
about the problems he has with his Macs... he does not
accept the fact he is just an incompetent user. "

In the past, this Mac user has also written the following statement
about how he believes he differs from "many in csma""

"Unlike many in csma, I do not focus my views on personalities".

If this person isn't merely focusing on a personality here, isn't
this person being an Apple apologist for claiming something he
himself has labeled as a "bug" in OSX is "*undoubtedly*" an
example of "user error" by an "incompetent user"?

The "person" you refer to is an idiot who is consumed with his
hatred for you. Even though he admits it is a bug from Apple he
blames you. He think you and Steve Jobs are the same person. I
guess last names are too confusing for him.


(snip some BS by Snit)


* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same

Yup... it's what you called a "bug"... an "inconsistency".

- the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way.

You recognize this, yet, you're saying the "error" here is mine. LOL!

Hint: This is an Apple "error".

While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

And, notably, you're *still* calling it a "bug"... an
"inconsistency"... while you simultaneously call it my "user error".

Put the crack pipe down now, Snit;)

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black
and white he is, again, lost.

Apple did something even you admit is inconsistent... I pointed it
out... and you call me lost. What meds can you possibly be mixing
together that would get you this high? LOL!

Steve showed he was

... right about the "inconsistency" of OSX, that you're labeling a
"bug"? Yes, I did show that.


Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his
socks), Steve will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts.

It's far more than obvious that you read all of my posts. People just
aren't as stupid as you need them to be.

It is a bug and it is your fault. You see, in Snot's mind you are Steve and
Steve runs Apple. He cannot figure out there is more than one Steve.

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

In article
,
MuahMan wrote:

Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

You're just jealous that you can never be as big of a troll that Snit.
You can never make everyone in a group actively hate you.


--
Sandman[.net]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Oct 30, 3:50*am, Sandman wrote:
In article
,

*MuahMan wrote:
Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

You're just jealous that you can never be as big of a troll that Snit.
You can never make everyone in a group actively hate you.

--
Sandman[.net]

Heh

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Oct 30, 3:50*am, Sandman wrote:
In article
,

*MuahMan wrote:
Everyone hates you. You're an annoying ****. Kill yourself and any of
your offspring.

You're just jealous that you can never be as big of a troll that Snit.
You can never make everyone in a group actively hate you.

--
Sandman[.net]

I must say i've seen anyone try so hard to get literally everyone to
hate them. Snit has some serious ****ing mental issues.

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/4/10 6:17 PM:

....
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

Your video didn't show anything but icon view.

The first video - sure. Steve merely said it could not be done. I proved
him wrong. When he changed his mind and decided it could be done in icon
view but not the other views, I proved him wrong there, too.

http://goo.gl/beyx

But since Steve was right about a quirk in doing so in some views, he
insisted the video did not show him how to do it. Even though I show him
the hot keys and everything.

Yeah, Steve was just flat out wrong in the quotes I show in that video: and
here is the funny thing - it is completely predictable you will *never*
acknowledge this and will make up stores about me. 100% predictable. And
Steve says it is up to me to explain why you lie... you see, when people lie
as you do, Steve holds *me* accountable for your lies. Steve Carroll thinks
you are a little child who is not responsible for your own lies.

It didn't show column or list view. In fact you claimed "Yup, you found a bug
Steve." when Steve pointed that FACT out to you.

Steve found a bug in that the are some ways that work in icon view that do
not work in the other views. Steve was wrong to say it could not be done in
other views.

This is just too complex for you to understand though. Or too upsetting.
You just have to throw a fit and lie. You cannot help yourself.

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

And Steve was wrong about this. And neither he nor you will ever admit to
this. And since Steve thinks you are a little child, he thinks you should
not be responsible for your lies. He thinks I should be.

Yeah, Steve is just that stupid.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

A second video you made AFTER Steve pointed out that there was NO Apple bug
like you claimed.

The bug where the order of operation is less flexible for the other views is
still there. It has not been corrected.

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

Because Steve does not understand how things are not always black and white
he is, again, lost. And he will not, of course, admit what is obvious: he
was wrong about OS X not allowing multiple aliases to be made.

Steve showed he was ignorant of the capabilities of OS X. I not only proved
to him he was wrong, I made a video that showed him how to do it - down to
showing him how and when to use what keyboard keys. The fact I helped Steve
was, to him, offensive, so he - as he does so often - trolled me and created
another army of socks to "help" him.

Oh: and I predict since I responded to a post of his (well, his socks), Steve
will insist that this means I read *all* of his posts. He cannot understand
how it cannot be black and white - how someone can read *some* posts without
reading all. Another sign of Steve's extreme black and white world view.

Yes he was and proved you an idiot at the same time.

Well, I suppose it might be idiotic to help the guy who is so filled with
hate he tracked me down to my work place and told me he would "twist arms"
to get me fired - but I am a nice guy... overly trusting. Many honest
folks, such as myself, are overly trusting. So be it.



--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Nov 4, 7:30*pm, Snit wrote:

(snip)

Steve merely said it could not be done. *I proved
him wrong. *When he changed his mind

This is a lie. I didn't "change" my mind, in fact, I stated:

"I stand corrected."

The only question here is why you would lie about something that is so
easily proven as a lie? Google shows you even singled out and
specifically quoted this exact piece of text before now:

Steve was shown he was wrong. To his credit he admitted:
Carroll:
------
I stand corrected.
-----
http://groups.google.com/group/comp....n&dmode=source


Are you simply unable to stop yourself from lying, Snit? LOL!


But since Steve was right about a quirk in doing so in some views, he
insisted the video did not show him how to do it.


That's because it didn't... I had already figured out a way to do it,
in fact, I posted about it as I explained to you that what you were
showing didn't work:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....n&dmode=source

Notably, the method I used differed slightly from the method that a
poster sent to me in email.

*Even though I show him the hot keys and everything.

The way I did it used "hot keys and everything"... same goes for the
method spoken about by the poster who emailed me. Your way didn't work
on my MBP, the emailer's way did. Why are you still whining and trying
to compete with this person?

(snip additional lies and drooling by Snit)

It didn't show column or list view. In fact you claimed "Yup, you found a bug
Steve." when Steve pointed that FACT out to you.

Steve found a bug in that the are some ways that work in icon view that do
not work in the other views.

Whatever you want to call it, I 'taught' you about it. Notably, you
never apologized for writing all manner of BS about me prior to your
acknowledgment of it.

*Steve was wrong to say it could not be done in
other views.

I said it couldn't be done the way I was doing it... the way you kept
insisting that it could as you simultaneously admitted I found a
"bug". IOW your position made no sense... again;)


This is just too complex for you to understand though. *Or too upsetting.
You just have to throw a fit and lie. *You cannot help yourself.

* Steve accepted that my video was correct

I accepted that I made a statement that was incorrect, which is why I
wrote: " I stand corrected."

Your video had another problem... which is why you posted another one
(a third one) when no one was looking, or rather, when you thought no
one was looking.

but then said that
* it only worked in icon view.

And Steve was wrong about this.

I wasn't "wrong" about using the key strokes I used in the manner in
which I used them. The person sending me the email pointed out
something you never mentioned, that something was later posted by me.
Here it is again:

"When selecting the files, when you select the very last one you want
to make an alias of, select and drag it. That way you are not de-
selecting anything in the list. Works for me on an iMac and a MBP,
in icon, list and column view."



*And neither he nor you will ever admit to this.

I know you want to be a "teacher" but the fact is that the person who
emailed me deserves the credit here.

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

In article ,
Snit wrote:

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/4/10 6:17 PM:

...
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

Your video didn't show anything but icon view.

The first video - sure. Steve merely said it could not be done.

and I'm sure you can provide a link where he says 'it can't be done' sometime
next year.


I proved him wrong.

Only AFTER he pointed out how it was done - NOT before. IOW, he proved YOU
wrong, and you were still calling it 'an Apple Bug'. Something it never was!


When he changed his mind and decided it could be done in icon
view but not the other views, I proved him wrong there, too.

You did't 'prove' anybody wrong except the person that called it 'an Apple bug'
and that person was michael glasser, aka snit.


http://goo.gl/beyx

But since Steve was right about a quirk in doing so in some views, he
insisted the video did not show him how to do it. Even though I show him
the hot keys and everything.

You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why don't you at
least try and get your facts right once?



~still more babbling by the liar snit snipped.

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/5/10 6:48 PM:

In article ,
Snit wrote:

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/4/10 6:17 PM:

...
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

Your video didn't show anything but icon view.

The first video - sure. Steve merely said it could not be done.

and I'm sure you can provide a link where he says 'it can't be done' sometime
next year.

His exact words were "but you can only do one app at a time this way".

And, below, you just snip and make things up. Boring.

Remember the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that
it only worked in icon view.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases in other views, and I proved it with a video:
http://goo.gl/beyx

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
particular way. While this way works with icon view, other
ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.
This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

I proved him wrong.

Only AFTER he pointed out how it was done - NOT before. IOW, he proved YOU
wrong, and you were still calling it 'an Apple Bug'. Something it never was!

See: you made that up.

When he changed his mind and decided it could be done in icon
view but not the other views, I proved him wrong there, too.

http://goo.gl/beyx

But since Steve was right about a quirk in doing so in some views, he
insisted the video did not show him how to do it. Even though I show him
the hot keys and everything.

You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why don't you at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Yeah, Steve was just flat out wrong in the quotes I show in that video: and
here is the funny thing - it is completely predictable you will *never*
acknowledge this and will make up stores about me. 100% predictable. And
Steve says it is up to me to explain why you lie... you see, when people lie
as you do, Steve holds *me* accountable for your lies. Steve Carroll thinks
you are a little child who is not responsible for your own lies.

It didn't show column or list view. In fact you claimed "Yup, you found a
bug Steve." when Steve pointed that FACT out to you.

Steve found a bug in that the are some ways that work in icon view that do
not work in the other views. Steve was wrong to say it could not be done in
other views.

This is just too complex for you to understand though. Or too upsetting.
You just have to throw a fit and lie. You cannot help yourself.

And you did!

* Steve accepted that my video was correct, but then said that it only
worked in icon view.

And Steve was wrong about this. And neither he nor you will ever admit to
this. And since Steve thinks you are a little child, he thinks you should
not be responsible for your lies. He thinks I should be.

Yeah, Steve is just that stupid.

And, Tim, so are you!

--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Nov 5, 8:38*pm, Snit wrote:

(snip)

His exact words were "but you can only do one app at a time this way".

And what "way" was I referring to?

* Steve was right to note that with the other views it is not
* quite the same - the keystrokes have to be done in a very
* particular way.

A particular "way", Snit?

Interesting, this part about the "way". Maybe you should give some
thought to the idea that Tim spotted something you remain baffled over
while your own words provide you the missing puzzle piece;)

While this way works with icon view, other
* ways that work with icon view do not work with the other views.

(poor Snit, he's all 'way'd' down)

* This is a minor bug - an area of arbitrary inconsistency.

That works in a certain "way" but not "other ways"? LOL!

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

In article ,
Snit wrote:

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/5/10 6:48 PM:

In article ,
Snit wrote:

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/4/10 6:17 PM:

...
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

Your video didn't show anything but icon view.

The first video - sure. Steve merely said it could not be done.

and I'm sure you can provide a link where he says 'it can't be done'
sometime
next year.

His exact words were "but you can only do one app at a time this way".

So you LIED when you claimed he said 'it could not be done'. Thanks for clearing
that up.


And, below, you just snip and make things up. Boring.

Removed your added BS. Your 'facts' don't agree with google, but then, if you
couldread, you'd already know that.



I proved him wrong.

Only AFTER he pointed out how it was done - NOT before. IOW, he proved YOU
wrong, and you were still calling it 'an Apple Bug'. Something it never
was!

See:

Yes, I see your lies don't agree with reality.


When he changed his mind and decided it could be done in icon
view but not the other views, I proved him wrong there, too.

http://goo.gl/beyx

But since Steve was right about a quirk in doing so in some views, he
insisted the video did not show him how to do it. Even though I show him
the hot keys and everything.

You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why don't you
at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the one making it
up.

More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/26/10 4:01 PM:

In article ,
Snit wrote:

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/5/10 6:48 PM:

In article ,
Snit wrote:

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/4/10 6:17 PM:

...
Ah, Steve and his sock share the same black and white world view. So he
(and you, his sock) know the facts:

* Steve Carroll was flat out wrong to deny that you can make
multiple aliases in OS X.

* I was absolutely right to note that you can make multiple
aliases, and I proved it with a video: http://goo.gl/UdWf

Your video didn't show anything but icon view.

The first video - sure. Steve merely said it could not be done.

and I'm sure you can provide a link where he says 'it can't be done'
sometime
next year.

His exact words were "but you can only do one app at a time this way".

So you LIED when you claimed he said 'it could not be done'. Thanks for
clearing
that up.


And, below, you just snip and make things up. Boring.

Removed your added BS. Your 'facts' don't agree with google, but then, if you
couldread, you'd already know that.



I proved him wrong.

Only AFTER he pointed out how it was done - NOT before. IOW, he proved YOU
wrong, and you were still calling it 'an Apple Bug'. Something it never
was!

See:

Yes, I see your lies don't agree with reality.


When he changed his mind and decided it could be done in icon
view but not the other views, I proved him wrong there, too.

http://goo.gl/beyx

But since Steve was right about a quirk in doing so in some views, he
insisted the video did not show him how to do it. Even though I show him
the hot keys and everything.

You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why don't you
at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the one making
it
up.

More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

He http://goo.gl/beyx

It is not like it is hard to prove you wrong. Again.

Are you *ever* right?

--
"A non-powered hub that will only support non-powered devices. IOW,
basically useless." -- Tim Adams

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/26/10 4:01 PM:

....
You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why don't you
at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the one making
it
up.

More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

And more detail for you, from a past post (not worth re-wording for you...
given how it is 100% predictable you will snip, run and lie in response to
the following):

Yes, he found a quirk (a bug, an inconsistency... wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!). There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other views, but
there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in all of the views.
Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way... and then after he
changed his mind about that and learned there was a way in icon view, he was
wrong about there not being a way in the other views.

As you have seen... and as Steve was shown and thus, if he was not an idiot,
learned:

http://goo.gl/cd8X Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:17:27 GMT
http://goo.gl/CVc4C Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:25:30 GMT
http://goo.gl/beyx Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:39:06 GMT

The three videos that I made, each done before Steve *claimed* to finally
figure it out based on an anonymous email he got. Oh, an anonymous email
that must remain private. Tee hee. But let us say he actually got one...
which is unlikely given his history of lying, but whatever... say he got
one. So? So someone finally explained to him what he could not figure out
on his own *or* with the videos I provided him. That is right: Steve claims
he was too stupid to figure it out from the video and needed an anonymous
email.

LOL!

Even when Steve tries to look clever he just ends up claiming he is an
idiot.

Oh, and even more fun. The first post where Steve claimed to have gotten
this email was http://goo.gl/roRor. Oct. 14 at 6:58 PM (over 16 hours
*after* the posting of the video which he and Tim Adams claim came after
Steve's email):

-----
This person emailed me with the following text:
"Steve, When selecting the files, when you select the very last
one you want to make an alias of, select and drag it. That way you
are not de-selecting anything in the list. Works for me on an iMac
and a MBP, in icon, list and column view."
-----

But my videos, which anyone can verify, were posted *before* that. Yes.
Easy to verify... javascript:alert(document.lastModified) on the videos will
work just fine to prove it for example... and is how I got the info for
above.

But, even more funny:

Steve Carroll, 5 Nov 2010
-----
BTW... there is an email but I can't divulge it unless the person
who wrote it gives me permission. See, unlike you, I don't divulge
private emails while I make a claim about being "honest and
honorable".
-----

LOL! Steve had already "divulged" the email in his past lies... he then
turns around and denies that he would ever sink to such a level.

Too damned funny! Once again, Steve piles his lies higher and higher and
they just come toppling down on him!


--
Survey: http://nitobi.com/survey/
241 of 571 said they use Dreamweaver (42%)
Tim Adams: "_80% DO NOT USE Dreamweaver AT ALL_!"

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Nov 26, 4:17*pm, Snit wrote:
Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/26/10 4:01 PM:

...





You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why don't you
at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the one making
it
up.

More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped

--
regarding Snit *"You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

And more detail for you, from a past post (not worth re-wording for you....
given how it is 100% predictable you will snip, run and lie in response to
the following):

Yes, he found a quirk (a bug, an inconsistency...

.... "user error"?

Oh did you forget that you also labeled it that way, Snit? You never
did explain how a "bug" is "user error".

wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!).

No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you have
over them.

*There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other views, but
there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in all of the views.


So you finally wrapped your head around this concept... good for you.

Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way

But I didn't say there wasn't "a way", I specifically said that he
couldn't do it "this way" (the "way" I was doing it at the time).

Just when you appeared to be making your "way" forward too... such a
shame. LOL!

.. and then after he
changed his mind about that and learned there was a way in icon view, he was
wrong about there not being a way in the other views.

As you have seen... and as Steve was shown and thus, if he was not an idiot,
learned:

* * http://goo.gl/cd8X *Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:17:27 GMT
* * http://goo.gl/CVc4C Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:25:30 GMT
* * http://goo.gl/beyx *Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:39:06 GMT

The three videos that I made, each done before Steve *claimed* to finally
figure it out based on an anonymous email he got. *

I *claimed* to have figured out 'a way' right away and I posted about
it, as google proves. Notably, not a single one of your videos
showed you trying to do it the "way" I said it couldn't be done. In
fact, when you tried it 'that way' you even agreed that it was
inconsistent as you labeled it a "bug", an "inconsistency" and
finally "user error"... as if a "bug" or "inconsistency" could
possibly be categorized as "user error" by any sane, honest and
honorable person.

(snip out of context lies and other assorted BS by Snit)

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 4:17 pm, Snit wrote:
Tim Adams stated in post

on 11/26/10 4:01 PM:

...





You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why
don't you at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the
one making it
up.

More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

And more detail for you, from a past post (not worth re-wording for
you... given how it is 100% predictable you will snip, run and lie
in response to the following):

Yes, he found a quirk (a bug, an inconsistency...

... "user error"?

Oh did you forget that you also labeled it that way, Snit? You never
did explain how a "bug" is "user error".

wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!).

No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you have
over them.

There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other views,
but there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in all of the
views.


So you finally wrapped your head around this concept... good for you.

Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way

But I didn't say there wasn't "a way", I specifically said that he
couldn't do it "this way" (the "way" I was doing it at the time).

Just when you appeared to be making your "way" forward too... such a
shame. LOL!

.. and then after he
changed his mind about that and learned there was a way in icon
view, he was wrong about there not being a way in the other views.

As you have seen... and as Steve was shown and thus, if he was not
an idiot, learned:

http://goo.gl/cd8X Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:17:27 GMT
http://goo.gl/CVc4C Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:25:30 GMT
http://goo.gl/beyx Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:39:06 GMT

The three videos that I made, each done before Steve *claimed* to
finally figure it out based on an anonymous email he got.

I *claimed* to have figured out 'a way' right away and I posted about
it, as google proves. Notably, not a single one of your videos
showed you trying to do it the "way" I said it couldn't be done. In
fact, when you tried it 'that way' you even agreed that it was
inconsistent as you labeled it a "bug", an "inconsistency" and
finally "user error"... as if a "bug" or "inconsistency" could
possibly be categorized as "user error" by any sane, honest and
honorable person.

(snip out of context lies and other assorted BS by Snit)

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 5:33 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 4:17 pm, Snit wrote:
Tim Adams stated in post

on 11/26/10 4:01 PM:

...





You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why
don't you at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the
one making it
up.

More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

And more detail for you, from a past post (not worth re-wording for
you... given how it is 100% predictable you will snip, run and lie
in response to the following):

Yes, he found a quirk (a bug, an inconsistency...

... "user error"?

Oh did you forget that you also labeled it that way, Snit? You never
did explain how a "bug" is "user error".

I have explained both the bug and your error many times, Steve.

wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!).

No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you have
over them.

The fact I used different (though accurate) terms is confusing you. Oh
well.

There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other views,
but there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in all of the
views.


So you finally wrapped your head around this concept... good for you.

You are very proud you found an inconsistency in how the views work.
Lovely. You earn a gold star.

Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way

But I didn't say there wasn't "a way", I specifically said that he
couldn't do it "this way" (the "way" I was doing it at the time).

Just when you appeared to be making your "way" forward too... such a
shame. LOL!

Your "defense" is you were not denying it could be done. Which is clearly a
lie. You are lying, Steve.

.. and then after he
changed his mind about that and learned there was a way in icon
view, he was wrong about there not being a way in the other views.

As you have seen... and as Steve was shown and thus, if he was not
an idiot, learned:

http://goo.gl/cd8X Thu, 14 Oct 2010 15:17:27 GMT
http://goo.gl/CVc4C Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:25:30 GMT
http://goo.gl/beyx Fri, 15 Oct 2010 02:39:06 GMT

The three videos that I made, each done before Steve *claimed* to
finally figure it out based on an anonymous email he got.

I *claimed* to have figured out 'a way' right away and I posted about
it, as google proves.

And you did this several hours after I showed you. Yippee... several
*hours* after being shown the above videos you figured out how to do what
you were shown.

And you are proud. Good. You get a second gold star.

Notably, not a single one of your videos
showed you trying to do it the "way" I said it couldn't be done.

The videos show the correct way. The last one, in particular, shows your
comments and then shows why they are wrong.

Poor Steve: cannot deal with the fact he was wrong.

In
fact, when you tried it 'that way' you even agreed that it was
inconsistent as you labeled it a "bug", an "inconsistency" and
finally "user error"... as if a "bug" or "inconsistency" could
possibly be categorized as "user error" by any sane, honest and
honorable person.

You already got your gold star for finding the inconsistency. Stop
bragging.


Oh, an anonymous email that must remain private. Tee hee. But let us say he
actually got one... which is unlikely given his history of lying, but
whatever... say he got one. So? So someone finally explained to him what he
could not figure out on his own *or* with the videos I provided him. That is
right: Steve claims he was too stupid to figure it out from the video and
needed an anonymous email.

LOL!

Even when Steve tries to look clever he just ends up claiming he is an idiot.

Gee, Steve... are your crickets going to chirp now? LOL! You just run away
scared.

Oh, and even more fun. The first post where Steve claimed to have gotten
this email was http://goo.gl/roRor. Oct. 14 at 6:58 PM (over 16 hours
*after* the posting of the video which he and Tim Adams claim came after
Steve's email):

-----
This person emailed me with the following text:
"Steve, When selecting the files, when you select the very last
one you want to make an alias of, select and drag it. That way you
are not de-selecting anything in the list. Works for me on an iMac
and a MBP, in icon, list and column view."
-----

But my videos, which anyone can verify, were posted *before* that. Yes.
Easy to verify... javascript:alert(document.lastModified) on the videos will
work just fine to prove it for example... and is how I got the info for
above.

But, even more funny:

Steve Carroll, 5 Nov 2010
-----
BTW... there is an email but I can't divulge it unless the person
who wrote it gives me permission. See, unlike you, I don't divulge
private emails while I make a claim about being "honest and
honorable".
-----

LOL! Steve had already "divulged" the email in his past lies... he then
turns around and denies that he would ever sink to such a level.

Gee, Steve... no wonder you hear crickets chirping so often... you have
*nothing* to say to fill the silence. Not when you are faced with your own
lies. LOL!

Too damned funny! Once again, Steve piles his lies higher and higher and
they just come toppling down on him!


LOL!


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
Snit wrote:
Tim Adams stated:

regarding Snit: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth, you
are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

And more detail for you, from a past post (not worth re-wording for
you... given how it is 100% predictable you will snip, run and lie in
response to the following): Yes, he found a quirk (a bug, an
inconsistency...

... "user error"? Oh did you forget that you also labeled it that way,
Snit? You never did explain how a "bug" is "user error".

73- Marious Barrier (COLA, regarding Snit): "I must recognize that it is
the first time I see that kind of troll, once that start asking moderately
serious questions and since the first answer, gradually starts to
degenerate it by, in many failed attempts of being sarcastic, inserting
various indirect insults and calling all people ignorant and unable to
answer what he asks for." 14 Oct 2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....607ea64f436821

wow, I have used multiple terms, Steve's head will spin!).

No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you have
over them.

102- Rapskat (COLA, to Snit): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
single out persons to target your attentions upon and then continuously
berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate their acrimonious
responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc. ad infinitum. Above all
things, your affinity for Macs and your overbearing pompous nature aside,
this is what convinces me that your primary purpose for frequenting this
and other groups is to troll." 07 Sep 2005

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....9c6b8e3e63f42d

--
HPT

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Tim Adams wrote:
Snit wrote:
Tim Adams stated:
Snit wrote:
Tim Adams stated:

Your video didn't show anything but icon view.

The first video - sure. Steve merely said it could not be done.

and I'm sure you can provide a link where he says 'it can't be done'
sometime next year.

His exact words were "but you can only do one app at a time this way".

So you LIED when you claimed he said 'it could not be done'. Thanks for
clearing that up.

99- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot Glasser is invading this group with his
inane drivel, so he has to bear what people think about that dishonest
retard. And just for the record: You *are* a Glasser sock" 30 Jan 2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....166f6fda92641b

And, below, you just snip and make things up. Boring.

Removed your added BS. Your 'facts' don't agree with google, but then,
if you couldread, you'd already know that.

42- -hh (to Snit): 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
definition of "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear example of how
you attempt to maliciously debase against anyone who disagrees with you.
As such, I consider this to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel
me. This is your only warning to consider rescinding your remark, with
the reminder that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
"responsible".' 25 Feb 2008

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....96641a3426293a

I proved him wrong.

Only AFTER he pointed out how it was done - NOT before. IOW, he proved
YOU wrong, and you were still calling it 'an Apple Bug'. Something it
never was!

See:

Yes, I see your lies don't agree with reality.

When he changed his mind and decided it could be done in icon view
but not the other views, I proved him wrong there, too.

http://goo.gl/beyx

But since Steve was right about a quirk in doing so in some views, he
insisted the video did not show him how to do it. Even though I show
him the hot keys and everything.

You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why
don't you at least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the one
making it up. More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser
snipped

RonB: (COLA): "Why do you bother responding to Snit? He makes no point, he
simply gainsays whatever you say. Just another version of Hadron's 'you're
a liar' mantra, which is about all he can muster nowadays." 27 May 2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp....9210dd877d7aa0

--
HPT

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Nov 26, 5:45*pm, Snit wrote:

(snip)

I have explained both the bug and your error many times, Steve.

Said Snit as he used yet another sock puppet, this time for the
purpose of pretending it's mine so he doesn't have to break his vow to
not talk to me directly (yes Snit, your games are *that* obvious).
Maybe you'll grow up next year.

wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!).

No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you have
over them.

The fact

.... that you called the same thing different names, one of them being
"user error" is documented in the google archive, as I have repeatedly
shown.

There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other views,
but there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in all of the
views.

So you finally wrapped your head around this concept... good for you.

You are very proud you found an inconsistency in how the views work.

I am honest that I found an inconsistency using the "way" that I
mentioned, you know, the same "way" that you initially agreed was
inconsistent (and are still agreeing), despite also labeling it as
"user error".

Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way

But *I didn't say there wasn't "a way", I specifically said that he
couldn't do it "this way" (the "way" I was doing it at the time).

Just when you appeared to be making your "way" forward too... such a
shame. LOL!

Your "defense

I don't need a "defense" from your delusions, Snit... no one ever did.

Reality check from google... (again): "...but you can only do one app
at a time this way. Even so, thirty apps shouldn't take too long to
do, even this way." - Steve Carroll

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

Notably, not *a single one of your videos
showed you trying to do it the "way" I said it couldn't be done.

The videos show the correct way. *

LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

You seem to forget that the google archive shows me talking about me
accomplishing this another "way" and it worked just fine. How do you
know the "way" you are referencing here is the "correct way"?

Poor Steve: cannot deal with the fact he was wrong.

Your claims that I was "wrong" and that a "bug" or an "inconsistency"
are the same thing as "user error" have no support. Restating the
claims ad infinitum don't make them real... no matter how much glue
you've sniffed;)

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:45 pm, Snit wrote:

(snip)

I have explained both the bug and your error many times, Steve.

Said Snit as he used yet another sock puppet, this time for the
purpose of pretending it's mine so he doesn't have to break his vow to
not talk to me directly (yes Snit, your games are *that* obvious).
Maybe you'll grow up next year.

wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!).

No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you
have over them.

The fact

... that you called the same thing different names, one of them being
"user error" is documented in the google archive, as I have repeatedly
shown.

There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other
views, but there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in
all of the views.

So you finally wrapped your head around this concept... good for
you.

You are very proud you found an inconsistency in how the views work.

I am honest that I found an inconsistency using the "way" that I
mentioned, you know, the same "way" that you initially agreed was
inconsistent (and are still agreeing), despite also labeling it as
"user error".

Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way

But I didn't say there wasn't "a way", I specifically said that he
couldn't do it "this way" (the "way" I was doing it at the time).

Just when you appeared to be making your "way" forward too... such
a shame. LOL!

Your "defense

I don't need a "defense" from your delusions, Snit... no one ever did.

Reality check from google... (again): "...but you can only do one app
at a time this way. Even so, thirty apps shouldn't take too long to
do, even this way." - Steve Carroll

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

Notably, not a single one of your videos
showed you trying to do it the "way" I said it couldn't be done.

The videos show the correct way.

LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

You seem to forget that the google archive shows me talking about me
accomplishing this another "way" and it worked just fine. How do you
know the "way" you are referencing here is the "correct way"?

Poor Steve: cannot deal with the fact he was wrong.

Your claims that I was "wrong" and that a "bug" or an "inconsistency"
are the same thing as "user error" have no support. Restating the
claims ad infinitum don't make them real... no matter how much glue
you've sniffed;)

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 7:28 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 5:45 pm, Snit wrote:

(snip)

I have explained both the bug and your error many times, Steve.

Said Snit as he used yet another sock puppet, this time for the
purpose of pretending it's mine so he doesn't have to break his vow to
not talk to me directly (yes Snit, your games are *that* obvious).
Maybe you'll grow up next year.

One: that has nothing to do with the topic - your confusion over how Apple
can have an inconsistency *and* how you can fail to know how to do
something. It is not like this is a complex concept, but it is one you are
showing no sign of understanding. Oh well. Not like I expect better of you
or think you will actually gain understanding and *admit* to it. Just as
you will never admit I showed you how to make multiple aliases, despite the
video proof, you will never admit you understand this simple concept even if
you someday do.

Two: I *am* replying to you directly. It is not like you are even using a
different Usenet client for your socks. Just interesting to see how
desperate you will get. And you get very, very desperate.


wow, I have used multiple
terms, Steve's head will spin!).

No, I'm well used to your tautologies and the confusion only you
have over them.

The fact I used different (though accurate) terms is confusing you. Oh
well.

... that you called the same thing different names, one of them being
"user error" is documented in the google archive, as I have repeatedly
shown.

As I note, above, the fact there can be an Apple bug *and* you can not know
how to do something is *not* something you will admit. You will trust, lie,
call me names, and play your other games as you show off how ignorant you
are. It makes you happy to do so. I hope.


There is *a* way that you can copy
multiple aliases in icon view that does not work in the other
views, but there is also *a* way (or maybe more) that works in
all of the views.

So you finally wrapped your head around this concept... good for
you.

You are very proud you found an inconsistency in how the views work.
Lovely. You earn a gold star.

I am honest that I found an inconsistency using the "way" that I
mentioned, you know, the same "way" that you initially agreed was
inconsistent (and are still agreeing), despite also labeling it as
"user error".

Nope. But you are proving me right *again* about how confusing a *simple*
concept is to you: there is both an inconsistency *and* you were clearly
ignorant of how to do something (as even you admitted... you pretended to
get an email that explained how to do what I had already showed you).

Steve, initially, was wrong about there not being a way

But I didn't say there wasn't "a way", I specifically said that he
couldn't do it "this way" (the "way" I was doing it at the time).

Just when you appeared to be making your "way" forward too... such
a shame. LOL!

Your "defense" is you were not denying it could be done. Which is clearly a
lie. You are lying, Steve.

I don't need a "defense" from your delusions, Snit... no one ever did.

Reality check from google... (again): "...but you can only do one app
at a time this way. Even so, thirty apps shouldn't take too long to
do, even this way." - Steve Carroll

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

See: you are using the very defense I noted you were. And you snipped. You
are pretending to have denied it could be done. You are lying. It is not
like this is complex.

Notably, not a single one of your videos
showed you trying to do it the "way" I said it couldn't be done.

And you did this several hours after I showed you. Yippee... several
*hours* after being shown the above videos you figured out how to do what
you were shown.

And you are proud. Good. You get a second gold star.

LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

Nope. I showed one way... the way that works. I showed that one way
working in both icon view and another view.

You seem to forget that the google archive shows me talking about me
accomplishing this another "way" and it worked just fine. How do you
know the "way" you are referencing here is the "correct way"?

You claimed the way you were talking about did not work. You even repeat
that, above. You cannot keep your story consistent in the same post, no
less over time. You are lying. Or stupid. I do not care which.

The videos show the correct way. The last one, in particular, shows your
comments and then shows why they are wrong.

Poor Steve: cannot deal with the fact he was wrong.

Your claims that I was "wrong" and that a "bug" or an "inconsistency"
are the same thing as "user error" have no support. Restating the
claims ad infinitum don't make them real... no matter how much glue
you've sniffed;)

LOL!

See: you repeat your same nonsense. If you post again with the type
snipping and lying you did in this post you will *not* get my attention
again. Even if you do as you did here and resend the exact same message
with a sock.

And since you are a desperate little troll just begging for my attention,
perhaps that will get you to actually quote in a more honest way. Maybe
not. Your dishonesty is so deeply ingrained in you that you simply might
not be able to stop yourself.

This whole "debate" is stupid. You did not know how to do something, you
were shown how, from this you learned but based on an inconsistency in OS X
you did not think it would work in other views, you were shown you were
wrong there too... and then you learned you could do it in the other views
even though the inconsistency exists.

There is no reason this needs to be a debate. There is no reason for you to
be so angry. Just accept you are learning and that learning is not a reason
for your obvious embarrassment - you should be happy you are learning. There
is no shame in it. And, of note, I never mocked you for not knowing - I
did, however, note your lies and your other poor behavior. Your learning I
commend.



--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Nov 26, 7:48*pm, Snit wrote:

One: that has nothing to do with the topic

Your sock puppets never did have anything to do with the topic. So why
do you keep using them?

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

See:

I "see" that I used the google archive to prove I used the term "this
way"... despite you trying to pretend I didn't or that it didn't
specifically reference a certain "way".


LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

Nope. *I showed one way... the way that works.

So, if a "way" happens to be one that "works" it's the "correct" way.
That is what you just argued. Fine... then I pointed to a "correct"
way, too.

You claimed the way you were talking about did not work.

Incorrect: I didn't just *claim* it, I got you to agree with it as you
labeled it 3 different things.

There is no reason this needs to be a debate.

I agree, especially being that you admitted I found an
"inconsistency". But that's you...generally found arguing 'stupid
debates' based on personalities.

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:48 pm, Snit wrote:

One: that has nothing to do with the topic

Your sock puppets never did have anything to do with the topic. So why
do you keep using them?

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

See:

I "see" that I used the google archive to prove I used the term "this
way"... despite you trying to pretend I didn't or that it didn't
specifically reference a certain "way".


LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

Nope. I showed one way... the way that works.

So, if a "way" happens to be one that "works" it's the "correct" way.
That is what you just argued. Fine... then I pointed to a "correct"
way, too.

You claimed the way you were talking about did not work.

Incorrect: I didn't just *claim* it, I got you to agree with it as you
labeled it 3 different things.

There is no reason this needs to be a debate.

I agree, especially being that you admitted I found an
"inconsistency". But that's you...generally found arguing 'stupid
debates' based on personalities.

LOL!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 8:32 PM:

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:48 pm, Snit wrote:

One: that has nothing to do with the topic

Your sock puppets never did have anything to do with the topic. So why
do you keep using them?

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

See:

I "see" that I used the google archive to prove I used the term "this
way"... despite you trying to pretend I didn't or that it didn't
specifically reference a certain "way".


LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

Nope. I showed one way... the way that works.

So, if a "way" happens to be one that "works" it's the "correct" way.
That is what you just argued. Fine... then I pointed to a "correct"
way, too.

You claimed the way you were talking about did not work.

Incorrect: I didn't just *claim* it, I got you to agree with it as you
labeled it 3 different things.

There is no reason this needs to be a debate.

I agree, especially being that you admitted I found an
"inconsistency". But that's you...generally found arguing 'stupid
debates' based on personalities.

LOL!

If I keep giving you attention, Steve, how long will you continue to make an
ass out of yourself again? Remember: this is not hard - you did not know
how something was done... I showed you... you were still confused and said
it could only be done in one view... I showed you that you were wrong.
Along the way you noted an inconsistency in how something works.

And that should be that. But it is not: you insist on trolling and lying
and spewing accusations - proving your deep hatred and jealousy. It really
is that simple.


--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

On Nov 26, 9:18*pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post on
11/26/10 8:32 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:48 pm, Snit wrote:

One: that has nothing to do with the topic

Your sock puppets never did have anything to do with the topic. So why
do you keep using them?

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

See:

I "see" that I used the google archive to prove I used the term "this
way"... despite you trying to pretend I didn't or that it didn't
specifically reference a certain "way".

LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

Nope. I showed one way... the way that works.

So, if a "way" happens to be one that "works" it's the "correct" way.
That is what you just argued. Fine... then I pointed to a "correct"
way, too.

You claimed the way you were talking about did not work.

Incorrect: I didn't just *claim* it, I got you to agree with it as you
labeled it 3 different things.

There is no reason this needs to be a debate.

I agree, especially being that you admitted I found an
"inconsistency". But that's you...generally found arguing 'stupid
debates' based on personalities.

LOL!

If I keep giving you attention, Steve

There's no "if in that, Snit... you *will* give me attention, you
can't stop yourself from giving me attention;)

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 9:18 pm, Snit wrote:
Big Crotch on a Small Fish stated in post
on 11/26/10 8:32 PM:





Steve Carroll wrote:
On Nov 26, 7:48 pm, Snit wrote:

One: that has nothing to do with the topic

Your sock puppets never did have anything to do with the topic. So
why do you keep using them?

"this way" - Steve Carroll
"even this way" - Steve Carroll

See:

I "see" that I used the google archive to prove I used the term
"this way"... despite you trying to pretend I didn't or that it
didn't specifically reference a certain "way".

LOL! Now we have yet another "way" thrown into the mix by you.

Nope. I showed one way... the way that works.

So, if a "way" happens to be one that "works" it's the "correct"
way. That is what you just argued. Fine... then I pointed to a
"correct" way, too.

You claimed the way you were talking about did not work.

Incorrect: I didn't just *claim* it, I got you to agree with it as
you labeled it 3 different things.

There is no reason this needs to be a debate.

I agree, especially being that you admitted I found an
"inconsistency". But that's you...generally found arguing 'stupid
debates' based on personalities.

LOL!

If I keep giving you attention, Steve

There's no "if in that, Snit... you *will* give me attention, you
can't stop yourself from giving me attention;)

LOL! Ain't that the truth!

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

An Apple apologist... or something else?
 

In article ,
Snit wrote:

Tim Adams stated in post
on
11/26/10 4:01 PM:

...
You 'showed him' AFTER he pointed out to you how it was done. Why don't
you
at
least try and get your facts right once?

And you made that up, too.

Sorry to say, your 'facts' don't agree with google. IOW you're the one
making
it
up.

More babbling by the trolling idiot michael glasser snipped

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

And more detail

That's already been addressed. Google proves you wrong. live with it.

--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm