Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Jay & Mary Julson wrote:
I have a Plugr. I have had it for about two weeks. The reason I went with this type is several. 1. easier to transport 2. less parts then the conventional one. 3. easier to manuver then conventional. 4. I went with the eight tine so only have eight tines instead of what the conventional have. To answer your question about tearing up the turf compared to the pull behind. I cann't say as I have not used or seen the the pull behind used. My customers are satisfied with the results. Thanks for the reply would you recommend it? are the holes "clean"? ie. does tines go pretty much straight up and down and just leave a hole in the ground? The reason I ask is I would like to use it on a putting green and holes ore ok as long as the ground around the hole is not damaged as that takes longer to grow back in and 'heal' than a simple hole does. does it appear well made and long lasting? Thanks again Bob |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Recommendations for plug aerator? | Lawns | |||
aerator- plug vs. disc | Lawns | |||
FS: broadcast spreader & aerator/seeder | North Carolina | |||
aerator- plug vs. disc | Lawns |