Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 16:08:23 GMT, "K Barrett"
wrote: And look at how many FCCs Paph rothschildianum has. I think someone mentioned that some judges think a plant has 'too many' awards and therefore no longer consider a plant judging. Well, obviously not. Same could be said for Paph armeniacum. K Barrett Not saying it is true with either of these plants... Sometimes the original awards and what is awarded today is so different the originals would now be considered not worth looking at. So as judges we need to compare and not count. There is the argument that awards raise the price in a Paph... is it fair to not raise the price for one competitor after you did it for another? But if every other plant has an award has the award lost its power? Still best to pick your own perfect bloom. SuE http://orchids.legolas.org/gallery/albums.php |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
AOS awards | Orchids | |||
AOS awards | Orchids | |||
RHS vs AOS Awards | Orchids | |||
FS- AOS Awards Quarterly 1997-2003 | Orchids | |||
F/S AOS Awards Quarterly | Orchids |