Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cites question
What are the rules about owning a registered hybred (wildcat reg. in
1995) that the parents are apparently considered endangered? The hybred was registered in 1995 as Paph a X Paph b. When I look the plant up in google these two parents are listed in many places as Paph a var b, and even in others that Paph a var b is considered a new newly discovered species in 2000/1. How can that be if a cross was registered in 1995? Thanx |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oh, wonderful CITES! | Orchids | |||
Could a Non-Profit for gathering genitic samples of orchids get past CITES | Orchids | |||
Paphiopedilum vietnamense and Paphiopedilum hermannii CITES and the EU | Orchids | |||
CITES: Dare we hope?? Is this for real???? | Orchids | |||
More Protection Urged for Rare Toothfish at CITES | Ponds |